Re: [qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Stuart Perkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:12:09 +0100 Zrubi wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 1/31/19 3:32 PM, unman wrote: >> I know many people using Qubes 4 with 12GB and HDD, without >> issues. SSD is better, but not a must. >

[qubes-users] Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread kitchm
The problem is more fundamental. In all things, we need to seek more commonality and simplicity in our lives. In computer related issues, I have found over the years that people who do not understand how things work (thanks to the poor educational systems) simply like to add more complexity

Re: [qubes-users] Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread Stuart Perkins
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:52:31 -0500 kitchm wrote: >The problem is more fundamental. > >In all things, we need to seek more commonality and >simplicity in our lives. In computer related issues, I have >found over the years that people who do not understand how >things work (thanks to the poor

Re: [qubes-users] why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread 19hundreds
Jan 31, 2019, 5:15 PM by no...@noses.com: > Before we begin: > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > Am Donnerstag, den 31.01.2019, 18:01 +0100 schrieb 19hundreds: > >> >> I agree at some level with what you are

[qubes-users] Re: Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread kitchm
Oh, sorry if I was not clear. I was speaking of industry standards and Microsoft is certainly not one of them. I guess I assumed that everyone understood that. Again, a problem with education. Further, when speaking of standards, not only was I not referencing proprietary ones, but I was

Re: [qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Zrubi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 1/31/19 3:32 PM, unman wrote: > I know many people using Qubes 4 with 12GB and HDD, without > issues. SSD is better, but not a must. Technically you are right. In practice, the user experience (HDD vs SSD) is not even comparable. The price

[qubes-users] Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread kitchm
The basic concept here is clarify what is being discussed. There appears to be two things; one is how a mail-list works and the other is how a mail-list is not as good as a forum. Being able to retrieve old e-mails assumes one has a mail store. Either one keeps them on their own computer by

Re: [qubes-users] why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread Franz
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 2:11 PM Stuart Perkins wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:01:58 +0100 (CET) > 19hundreds <19hundr...@tutanota.com> wrote: > > > > >I agree at some level with what you are saying however, the current > mailing list has a lot of valuable information so I believe it's gonna

Re: [qubes-users] Intel ME and AEM/HEADS

2019-01-31 Thread Illidan Pornrage
On 1/30/19 4:45 PM, Alexandre Belgrand wrote: Le mercredi 30 janvier 2019 à 12:38 +0100, Maillist a écrit : Only if you configure it that way.Also, even if you do, you wanna make sure it only accepts updates signed by your personal key. Interesting. Could you point out the documentation

[qubes-users] Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread billollib
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 9:47:37 PM UTC-5, kitchm wrote: > The basic concept here is clarify what is being discussed. > There appears to be two things; one is how a mail-list works > and the other is how a mail-list is not as good as a forum. > [snip] Maybe I'm not getting something

[qubes-users] Re: why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread Eric
What is all the fuss about? I am replying here from the Qubes user forum that is integrated into the mailing list since October last year. A link to this thread: https://qubes-os.info/index.php?t=msg=650=0; This forum is currently unofficial but seems to work fine. Only has a few months worth of

[qubes-users] How to make AppVM date persist?

2019-01-31 Thread Jon deps
Hello, using Fedora-29 , I've used timedatectl set-timezone in the template and the AppVM but it keeps reverting to UTC. dom0 is set to my localtime correct, my updatevm is sys-net which is using debian-9 template hence, all my thunderbird emails are stamped to UTC , I'd rather they were set

[qubes-users] Re: Upgrades for dom0-Qubes 4; on system reboot skips plymouth, usb kb dies, can't enter decrypt pw

2019-01-31 Thread Lorenzo Lamas
On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 7:55:06 PM UTC+1, qubert wrote: > First visible error on screen: > [FAILED] Failed to start Setup Virtual Console > Second vis error: > [FAILED] Failed to start Show Plymouth Boot Screen. > > No problem, eh? Because a few lines later, it prompts me for the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Zrubi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 1/31/19 11:45 AM, Panini Panini wrote: > 16GB RAM doesnt work fine? and a ssd with 500gb instead of hdd will > be more good? 16GB is fine, but the more is the better ;) SSD is a must. - -- Zrubi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Foppe de Haan
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 11:45:29 AM UTC+1, Panini Panini wrote: > joi, 31 ianuarie 2019, 02:32:03 UTC-8, Panini Panini a scris: > > nJoy Titan 600, 600W Real Power, PFC Activ, 80 Plus Bronze > > Seagate Barracuda, 2TB, 3,5'', 256MB > > ASUS PRIME H270-PLUS, LGA1151, H270, TPM, M.2 > >

[qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Panini Panini
joi, 31 ianuarie 2019, 02:32:03 UTC-8, Panini Panini a scris: > nJoy Titan 600, 600W Real Power, PFC Activ, 80 Plus Bronze > Seagate Barracuda, 2TB, 3,5'', 256MB > ASUS PRIME H270-PLUS, LGA1151, H270, TPM, M.2 > Intel Core™ i5-7400, 3.00Ghz, Kaby Lake, 6MB, Socket 1151, BOX > Corsair Vengeance

[qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread Foppe de Haan
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 11:32:03 AM UTC+1, gabia...@gmail.com wrote: > nJoy Titan 600, 600W Real Power, PFC Activ, 80 Plus Bronze > Seagate Barracuda, 2TB, 3,5'', 256MB > ASUS PRIME H270-PLUS, LGA1151, H270, TPM, M.2 > Intel Core™ i5-7400, 3.00Ghz, Kaby Lake, 6MB, Socket 1151, BOX >

[qubes-users] hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread gabiadini13
nJoy Titan 600, 600W Real Power, PFC Activ, 80 Plus Bronze Seagate Barracuda, 2TB, 3,5'', 256MB ASUS PRIME H270-PLUS, LGA1151, H270, TPM, M.2 Intel Core™ i5-7400, 3.00Ghz, Kaby Lake, 6MB, Socket 1151, BOX Corsair Vengeance LPX 8GB DIMM, DDR4, 2400 MHz, CL 16, 1.2V, X2 -- You received this

Re: [qubes-users] Intel ME and AEM/HEADS

2019-01-31 Thread Maillist
Hello, i woulnd be aware of any documentation regarding this, except this: https://coreboot.org/status/kconfig-options.html The option you want to set while configuring coreboot is, depending on your goal: INTEL_CHIPSET_LOCKDOWN and: LOCK_SPI_FLASH_NO_ACCESS Quote from the Documentation:

Re: [qubes-users] Intel ME and AEM/HEADS

2019-01-31 Thread Maillist
Yes, that is correct. On 1/30/19 4:33 AM, Frank Beuth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:09:23PM -0500, Chris Laprise wrote: >> On 1/29/19 8:59 PM, Frank Beuth wrote: >>> Can someone explain the interaction between Anti Evil Maid/HEADS and >>> the Intel Management Engine to me? >>> >>> I read an

Re: [qubes-users] Re: hcl for qubes 4.0 or 4.0.1 is it good?

2019-01-31 Thread unman
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:50:13AM +0100, Zrubi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 1/31/19 11:45 AM, Panini Panini wrote: > > 16GB RAM doesnt work fine? and a ssd with 500gb instead of hdd will > > be more good? > > 16GB is fine, but the more is the better ;) > SSD

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Reversing dom0 testing repo installation

2019-01-31 Thread unman
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:28:17PM +0100, qubes-...@tutanota.com wrote: > > Just a humble reminder for my question. I tried to research the topic, but > didn't move anywhere. Can anyone advice me please? > > Jan 28, 2019, 3:59 PM by qubes-...@tutanota.com: > > > hi, I accidentaly downloaded

Re: [qubes-users] Intel ME and AEM/HEADS

2019-01-31 Thread Alexandre Belgrand
Le jeudi 31 janvier 2019 à 14:21 +0100, Maillist a écrit : > INTEL_CHIPSET_LOCKDOWN Nice feature. This makes impossible to update BIOS without physical access to the chip. I was unaware of this feature, thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [qubes-users] why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread 19hundreds
I agree at some level with what you are saying however, the current mailing list has a lot of valuable information so I believe it's gonna be hard to se it replaced with something else. Beside the unofficial resources listed by others, I add  https://reddit.com/r/qubes

Re: [qubes-users] why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread Stuart Perkins
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:01:58 +0100 (CET) 19hundreds <19hundr...@tutanota.com> wrote: > >I agree at some level with what you are saying however, the current mailing >list has a lot of valuable information so I believe it's gonna be hard to se >it replaced with something else. > >Beside the

Re: [qubes-users] why mail-list?

2019-01-31 Thread Achim Patzner
Before we begin: A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Am Donnerstag, den 31.01.2019, 18:01 +0100 schrieb 19hundreds: > > I agree at some level with what you are saying however, the current > mailing list has a lot of