On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 2:26:59 AM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> > A lot of people have two GPUs and don't realize it. Even so, its not
> > like we are talking about great expense here: Even having access to
> > weaker GPUs could make a big difference in Qubes' power and usability.
> >
>
> A lot of people have two GPUs and don't realize it. Even so, its not
> like we are talking about great expense here: Even having access to
> weaker GPUs could make a big difference in Qubes' power and usability.
>
> Projecting our own personal routines on the issue will probably not be
> of m
On 07/08/2016 12:27 AM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also confused, you say gpus are so insecure and that qubes is not doing
enough to isolate them?
I don't think that's what I implied. But trying to be concise on a
complex subject can leave some people with the wrong impression, so I
apolog
I'm also confused, you say gpus are so insecure and that qubes is not doing
enough to isolate them? Excuse me for being noob but doesn't qubes not allow
most gpu functions to go past dom0. And so you would rather have them in domu
domains with similar isolation as the netcard vm (which has no
On 07/07/2016 12:45 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
On 7 July 2016 16:53:35 BST, Chris Laprise wrote:
On 07/07/2016 10:40 AM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
On 7 July 2016 03:28:48 BST, Chris Laprise
wrote:
On 07/06/2016 09:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthro
On 7 July 2016 16:53:35 BST, Chris Laprise wrote:
>On 07/07/2016 10:40 AM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
>>
>> On 7 July 2016 03:28:48 BST, Chris Laprise
>wrote:
>>> On 07/06/2016 09:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthrough on qubes, cause
>>> imo, gaming
On 07/07/2016 10:40 AM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
On 7 July 2016 03:28:48 BST, Chris Laprise wrote:
On 07/06/2016 09:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthrough on qubes, cause
imo, gaming online usually means all security is out the window. Plus
I feel a
On 7 July 2016 03:28:48 BST, Chris Laprise wrote:
>On 07/06/2016 09:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthrough on qubes, cause
>imo, gaming online usually means all security is out the window. Plus
>I feel as though gpu is much bigger attack surface f
On 07/06/2016 09:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthrough on qubes, cause imo, gaming
online usually means all security is out the window. Plus I feel as though gpu
is much bigger attack surface for side channel attacks then net card. I could
be wro
I'm not so adamant about wanting gpu passthrough on qubes, cause imo, gaming
online usually means all security is out the window. Plus I feel as though gpu
is much bigger attack surface for side channel attacks then net card. I could
be wrong because I have no clue about low level stuff, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-06 14:24, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 17:28:49 UTC-3, Andrew David
> Wong escreveu: On 2016-07-06 12:33, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 12:37:31 UTC-3, Andrew
D
Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 17:28:49 UTC-3, Andrew David Wong escreveu:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-07-06 12:33, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 12:37:31 UTC-3, Andrew David
> > Wong escreveu: On 2016-07-05 12:35, juris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-06 12:33, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 12:37:31 UTC-3, Andrew David
> Wong escreveu: On 2016-07-05 12:35, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 06:54:14 UTC-3, Andrew
Dav
Em quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 12:37:31 UTC-3, Andrew David Wong escreveu:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-07-05 12:35, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 06:54:14 UTC-3, Andrew David
> > Wong escreveu: On 2016-07-04 22:46, juris.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-05 12:35, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 06:54:14 UTC-3, Andrew David
> Wong escreveu: On 2016-07-04 22:46, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you
On 07/05/2016 03:35 PM, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Andrew. But still... I did not find wich encryption is used by default
in qubes documentation. And people still has to do it manually. Plus, when i
went to the advanced partitioning, there were lots of bugs. We need to be able
to cho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:47:33AM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2016 04:43 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > This was discussed many times, so search the archive for more detailed
> > answer. In short: GPU will always be able
Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 10:23:07 UTC-3, Niels Kobschätzki escreveu:
> > On July 5, 2016 at 7:46 AM juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
>
>
>
> > 2) Qubes face 2 problems nowadays for engaging new users with real security.
> >
> > a) Qubes is a system for HIGH END computers with lots of R
Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 06:54:14 UTC-3, Andrew David Wong escreveu:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-07-04 22:46, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you
> > install, you have no encryption options.
>
Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 05:44:00 UTC-3, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
escreveu:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:46:52PM -0700, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you install, you
> >
Em terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 05:38:30 UTC-3, Francesco escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:46 AM, wrote:
> 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you install, you
> have no encryption options.
>
> distros thinks that if a user wants some strong crypto thing, they must
> On July 5, 2016 at 7:46 AM juris...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> 2) Qubes face 2 problems nowadays for engaging new users with real security.
>
> a) Qubes is a system for HIGH END computers with lots of RAM. Usually if for
> people that has WINDOWS and GAMES also, a good GPU, and wont waste their
On 07/05/2016 04:43 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:46:52PM -0700, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you install, you have
no encryption options.
Full disk encr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/05/2016 10:38 AM, Franz wrote:
> I fully agree with the idea of respecting user needs, but why do
> you think gamers are really interested in strong security? Only
> because they spend money for expensive computers? It seems a poor
> motivati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-04 22:46, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you
> install, you have no encryption options.
Qubes uses full disk enryption by default:
https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/user-faq/#does-qubes-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:46:52PM -0700, juris...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you install, you
> have no encryption options.
Full disk encryption is enabled in default installation option.
> 2) Qub
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:46 AM, wrote:
> 1) qubes is a system for security and isolation. But when you install, you
> have no encryption options.
> distros thinks that if a user wants some strong crypto thing, they must
> research themselves and do all manually. We dont even find nothing about
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
