On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 at 11:00:36 UTC+8 sv...@svensemmler.org wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 8/22/20 10:10 AM, unman wrote:
> > To deal with the question here, I use debian minimal templates
> > extensively, (NOT with qubes-vm-hardening), and have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 8/22/20 10:10 AM, unman wrote:
> To deal with the question here, I use debian minimal templates
> extensively, (NOT with qubes-vm-hardening), and have never seen
> this issue - neither the unreliable firewall nor the warning
> prompts issue. I've
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:01:54AM -0700, 54th Parallel wrote:
> On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote:
>
> > I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on
> > debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on
> > brand-spanking-new
On Saturday, 22 August 2020 at 18:57:22 UTC+8 Frank Schäckermann wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean with „behind a vpn vm“.
>
> My setup is such that I have the sys-net VM which is used as network vm in
> sys-firewall and a few sys-vpn-xxx. sys-firewall in turn is used as network
> vm for all
> On 22. Aug 2020, at 11:01, 54th Parallel wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote:
>> I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on
>> debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on
>> brand-spanking-new installations (plural)
On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote:
> I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on
> debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on
> brand-spanking-new installations (plural) being unreliable firewalls. They
> sometimes function but not
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 00:56:07 UTC+8 awokd wrote:
>
> Systemctl in sys-firewall tells me qubes-firewall.service is "loaded
> active running", if that helps.
>
> --
> - don't top post
> Mailing list etiquette:
> - trim quoted reply to only relevant portions
> - when possible, copy
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:55:40PM +, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> I had double-checked my debian-10-minimal firewall template against the
> packages you installed and they matched, so I'm trying to think what
> else is different. Maybe because you manually edited the rules? I've
> seen
Sven Semmler:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:46:12PM +, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
>> Maybe it doesn't like the "disposable" part? Try it with a regular AppVM
>> based on that same minimal template.
>
> I did: makes no difference. Also I've been running debian-based and
> fedora-based
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:46:12PM +, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> Maybe it doesn't like the "disposable" part? Try it with a regular AppVM
> based on that same minimal template.
I did: makes no difference. Also I've been running debian-based and
fedora-based disposable sys-firewall for
Sven Semmler:
> Hi,
>
> I created a sys-firewall based on debian-10-minimal:
>
> * qvm-clone debian-10-minimal deb-10-sys-firewall
> * qvm-create --template deb-10-sys-firewall --label blue dvm-sys-firewall
> * qvm-prefs dvm-sys-firewall template_for_dispvms True
> * qvm-create --class DispVM
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:59:57AM -0600, Sven Semmler wrote:
> As far as I can tell the firewall rules are enacted / the firewall does work.
> So it's "just" Qubes Manager thinking it's not. How does it check?
$ qvm-service sys-firewall
qubes-firewall on
clocksyncon
12 matches
Mail list logo
