Re: [racket-users] Descriptions, URLs, and READMEs for racket org projects

I agree! Thank you for offering. One thought, tho: we probably don't want to duplicate information (as it will probably get out of sync). Robby On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Yes, PRs for this sort of thing would definitely be welcome. > >

Re: [racket-users] Descriptions, URLs, and READMEs for racket org projects

Yes, PRs for this sort of thing would definitely be welcome. Sam On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Winston Weinert wrote: > I was perusing the Racket organization GitHub and noticed many of the repos > do not have descriptions, URLs, and READMEs. > > I think this would be

[racket-users] Descriptions, URLs, and READMEs for racket org projects

I was perusing the Racket organization GitHub and noticed many of the repos do not have descriptions, URLs, and READMEs. I think this would be nice if each Racket package had a README with a link to the documentation (on r-l.org) and maybe a copy-paste from the scribblings of its synopsis.

Re: [racket-users] Module dependencies

Modules cannot refer to each other in a cyclic fashion, including submodules. — Matthias > On May 27, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Brandon Irizarry > wrote: > > Say I have two files, "file-a.rkt" and "file-b.rkt" that each contain a > submodule test, like so: > > >

Re: [racket-users] plan for the upcoming v7.0 release

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:02:39PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > The next release of Racket will be version 7.0: > > * Version 7.0 is a milestone on our path to replace the old, > C-implemented runtime system with Chez Scheme. > > * As such, version 7.0 reflects MAJOR INTERNAL CHANGES that

Re: [racket-users] plan for the upcoming v7.0 release

At Sun, 27 May 2018 15:42:28 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > What will happen to the performance of expander, though? > IIUC, the present C expander will be gone in Racket 7 and replaced > with a new expander written in Racket. While Chez runtime > users will enjoy the Racket performance boost that

Re: [racket-users] plan for the upcoming v7.0 release

On 05/27/2018 03:10 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: Hi Dmitry, At Sun, 27 May 2018 14:21:27 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: We do not expect Racket users to see a big difference between Racket v6.12 and Racket v7.0. I once saw in some text file that extflonums will not make it to Racket on Chez. Will

[racket-users] Module dependencies

Say I have two files, "file-a.rkt" and "file-b.rkt" that each contain a submodule test, like so: Contents of "file-a.rkt": #lang racket/base (define (my-function) 'apple) (module+ test (require "file-b.rkt") (other-function)) Contents of "file-b.rkt": #lang racket/base (define