I can install the windows version of Racket CS and DrRacket (and my
program) runs fine, however when I try to run "raco" I get a message
windows with the "Can't find C:\Program FIles\Racket\.\racket.exe":
I have no extra packages installed or migrated to this installation.
Alex.
On Friday,
Hi,
It seems that after an identifier has been shifted
by syntax-shift-phase-level, the original identifier can bind the shifted
identifier, but not the other way around. I think the correct behavior is
that neither should bind the other. The following code can be used to test
this.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 03:03:02AM +0800, stewart mackenzie wrote:
>
> If you want to Racket2 popular make it easy for users to get the
> programmer's responsive applications and programmers will come in
> droves. Drop Chez, reimplement the Racket interpreter in Rust and
> target it at WASM.
I
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:59:03AM -0700, Jérôme Martin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 9:39:08 PM UTC+2, Atlas Atlas wrote:
> > For example men in general more aggressive then women, they also pursue
> different social goals. You cannot ignore this, or blame the men for what
> they are.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:41:31AM -0700, Sepand Meenu wrote:
> I have approached Racket mainly from a computational perspective (physics
> and math), and I've found parentheses so far _not_ much of a distraction or
> annoyance. Actually, as far as the parens reduce the amount of syntactical
>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:28:24AM -0700, Mike G. wrote:
> Opinions are like belly buttons, and I'd like to show you two of mine (as in
> that terrible Gene Roddenberry film).
>
> I very much like the overall goals of making Racket more consistent and more
> generic. They strike me as reforms
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:42:10PM -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
>
> This makes me wonder if some experienced programmers dislike simple
> syntax, not just because it is unfamiliar to them, but also because it
> is too simple to serve as an effective in-group filter. If humanities
> students are
There is a #racket2 channel on the racket slack:
https://racket.slack.com/archives/C06V96CKX/p156415778811
The Racket Slack is at https://racket.slack.com/
visit
http://racket-slack.herokuapp.com/ to sign up
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I found Andy Keep's 2013 talk about writing a nanopass compiler super
interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os7FE3J-U5Q
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:50:57 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:47:35 -0700 (PDT), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > I installed the windows version of the Racket CS build and, when trying to
> > run DrRacket I get the following error in a console:
> >
> > variable force-unfasl is not
Thank you, everyone, for a wide-ranging discussion on Racket2, syntax,
and more!
The future-of-Racket discussion should continue, but lets' move it off
the racket-users mailing list. The two best places to continue are
https://github.com/racket/racket2-rfcs
https://racket.slack.com/ on
At Thu, 25 Jul 2019 18:55:18 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen wrote:
> Based on my understanding, (bound-identifier=? id-a id-b) only returns true
> if id-a would bind id-b AND id-b would bind id-a. Also based on my
> understanding, id-a will bind id-b doesn't imply that id-b will bind id-a.
> So, if
Hello,
Please, find below the final call for draft papers for IFL 2019.
Please forward these to anyone you think may be interested.
Apologies for any duplicates you may receive.
best regards,
Jurriaan Hage
Publicity Chair of IFL
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 9:39:08 PM UTC+2, Atlas Atlas wrote:
> For example men in general more aggressive then women, they also pursue
different social goals. You cannot ignore this, or blame the men for what
they are. You also cannot ignore the fact that people in general driven by
their
I have approached Racket mainly from a computational perspective (physics
and math), and I've found parentheses so far _not_ much of a distraction or
annoyance. Actually, as far as the parens reduce the amount of syntactical
complexity, I am in favour of them (compared to the nasty syntactical
Opinions are like belly buttons, and I'd like to show you two of mine (as in
that terrible Gene Roddenberry film).
I very much like the overall goals of making Racket more consistent and more
generic. They strike me as reforms of the language. I wonder if adding these
features would be too
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:10:44PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Atlas, I will have to think more about your message, but I think you're
> right to suggest that FAANGs might be part of a problem
Perhaps I'm the only one, but I had no idea what "FAANG" meant. For similar
folks:
"FAANG is an
17 matches
Mail list logo
