Re: [racket-users] Apple M1

2020-11-24 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Have you tried running it under Rosetta 2? $ arch -x86_64 racket # or do $ arch -x86_64 zsh # now all commands will run under Rosetta 2 Or so I believe from seeing people with similar problems, with other software. I have not tested this, and do. Not have an M1 Mac. And, I have no idea how to

Re: [racket-users] Re: (chaperone RacketCon) 2020

2020-09-03 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Jay, I was expecting this to be like PLDI, and that came with an amazing song: “This is Still PLDI” — https://youtu.be/hVMCl64Uhe8 Does Racket Con have an official song? Thanks, Andrew P.S. — yes, I am being a troll. However, I would genuinely love to see a Racket Con song. I have no

Re: [racket-users] Code Jam

2020-03-30 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I am surely not the only one asking “What is code jam?” > On Mar 30, 2020, at 06:52, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote: > >  > Code Jam is in a few days, but Racket is not available :(. > > Anyone know how difficult is to add a new language to the list? (Probably for > 2021.) > > Gustavo > -- >

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-22 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:15 AM Alexis King wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2019, at 14:16, Dexter Lagan wrote: > To say that Racket is so defined by its syntax that it will cease to be > distinguishable from any other language if it is changed is absurd, and it’s > frankly insulting to all the people

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Thank you for writing this. On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:49 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > Possible Language Changes > - > > The Racket community has long discussed possibilities for Racket2. Here > are a few potential changes from the wish list: I like this list of changes.

Re: [racket-users] go cheney yourself

2019-01-09 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I was hoping for a link to Baker’s “Cheney on the MTA” http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/CheneyMTA.html (Since I didn’t get it, here you are!) > On Jan 9, 2019, at 17:41, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote: > > Entirely off-topic for racket-users. > > Where is this list that I can read you post links

Re: [racket-users] hackernews

2018-12-27 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 8:24 AM Brett Gilio wrote: > > > Hendrik Boom writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:51:17AM -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > >> > >> Python started out as some guy on Usenet with a reusable extension > >> language (Tcl was another, and some RnRS implementations were

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
r thread, and didn't see an entry in the Jupyter Kernels list so just assumed this was not a thing yet. Thanks for pointing out the reference to existing work here! > On Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 12:53:13 AM UTC-5, Andrew Gwozdziewycz > wrote: >> >> It seems like the better bang

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
It seems like the better bang for buck might be implementing a Jupyter kernel, and leveraging that ecosystem. https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/Jupyter-kernels > On Dec 20, 2018, at 02:46, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > If anyone is looking to avoid relatives over the winter holiday season,

Re: [racket-users] Racket language for enterprise software

2018-09-25 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:37, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > I'm not sure, but I suspect many employers might also want you to say > "agile", "scrum", and "bro" a lot, preferably with an affable Californian > surfer accent. :) SHRED THE GNAR! -- You received this message because you are

Re: [racket-users] Can anyone help me with a change?

2017-10-16 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Hi, I think it's the case that making the change to `random` is simple (or removing it if that's the appropriate thing), though I *believe* that Danny would be the only one who could re-upload it to planet. If you're willing to get it from a different source, e.g. pkgs.racket-lang.org, then it

Re: [racket-users] Intro and projects inquiry

2017-10-12 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:02 PM, David Storrs <david.sto...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We need people building tools and blogging about why using Racket made > I agree that talkin

Re: [racket-users] Intro and projects inquiry

2017-10-12 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I love seeing all of these project ideas, but I really don't think Racket needs a "killer app." I think what it needs is the people passionate about it building tools in it, and *using* those tools in the work place, and sharing the experiences of using those tools more vocally. We need people

Re: [racket-users] Racketeers and slide-show presentations

2017-09-16 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I've been hacking on a way to make *simpler* slideshow presentations, which I'll actually present briefly at Racketcon next month. The idea is to take something plaintext and turn it into slides, so you don't have to be a pict master. I am trying to work in how to include slides that are Picts,

Re: [racket-users] Seeking a graphviz like, diagramming language for Racket

2017-08-25 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Are you focused more on replacing Graphviz, or a generalized drawing >> and visualization library that could be used to more easily put >> together a Graphviz l

Re: [racket-users] Seeking a graphviz like, diagramming language for Racket

2017-08-19 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard <jensa...@soegaard.net> wrote: > 2017-08-18 12:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture >> d

Re: [racket-users] Seeking a graphviz like, diagramming language for Racket

2017-08-19 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
ough to take a serious stab at recreating that diagram more manually, and seeing where it falls flat, so I'll try that as an exercise next week and report back. > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >&

Re: [racket-users] Seeking a graphviz like, diagramming language for Racket

2017-08-19 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
book of Graph Drawing and Visualization looks really great! Thanks for the recommendation! > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture >&

[racket-users] Seeking a graphviz like, diagramming language for Racket

2017-08-18 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Hi folks, I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the question of "which annoying tool should I use?" Graphviz has limitations for the type of stuff I use it for, but I settle for it anyway, since it's a lot less frustrating

[racket-users] Racket Con Lightning Talks?

2017-08-15 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
While I'm guessing the answer is "the schedule is too full" (and, woah, does it look like an incredible lineup) does Racket Con have room for lightning talks? Lightning talks, for those not familiar, are typically casual, 5 minute presentations on a topic. If there is room, and the stars align,

Re: [racket-users] RacketCon Code of Conduct

2017-06-18 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I used to run a Meetup in NYC called "Hack and Tell." For the first 5 years or something I kind of expected people to just be nice to each other, and do the right thing. Then, I started having private conversations with people, some women, some POC, and realized they had bad interactions that I

Re: [racket-users] Readtable extensions and syntax coloring in DrRacket

2017-05-01 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Hi Brendan, I'm wondering if you tried the here string syntax for your use case, which other than the fact that it requires a couple of newlines seems similar in vein to what you were going for (e.g. it doesn't escape anything)? ```racket > #< wrote: > I wrote a little Racket meta-language that

Re: [racket-users] Racket Shell

2016-08-23 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
> On Aug 22, 2016, at 13:18, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:38:37 -0500, > Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote: >> >> This discussion has reminded of SHILL >> (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/

Re: [racket-users] Racket Shell

2016-08-22 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
This discussion has reminded of SHILL (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-moore.pdf) which is less user focused, and more security / capabilities focused, but the prototype (in Racket) utilizes contracts to enforce capabilities checks. I'm really into the idea of a

Re: [racket-users] Racket -> HTML+JavaScript using Urlang and Ractive

2016-03-20 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Daniel Prager wrote: > Awesomely, Jens has been working on Urlang: a Racket-ish syntax for > JavaScript, using the nanopass compiler infrastructure: > > https://github.com/soegaard/urlang > > and more ambitiously, a Racket (subset)

Re: [racket-users] predicate as an atom within a regexp?

2016-03-19 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > What is the best approach to destructuring strings using predicates? For > instance "match a substring for which `string->number` is true." > > I am imagining an API that utilizes SCSH style regexes but allows you to do

Re: [racket-users] predicate as an atom within a regexp?

2016-03-18 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am imagining an API that utilizes SCSH style regexes but allows you to > do something like this (fictional

Re: [racket-users] racket users fight for their right to colon keywords

2015-10-22 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Leif Andersen > wrote: > > > I am genuinely surprised :keyword saw so much support and that change >> was so attractive to people. >> >> That's because of the

Re: [racket-users] Re: racket users fight for their right to colon keywords

2015-10-22 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Jack Firth wrote: > Perhaps it would have been better phrased as "Which do you prefer, > #:keyword or :keyword?" with options like "strongly prefer x", "prefer x", > "indifferent", "prefer y", "strongly prefer y", rather than two different

Re: [racket-users] Macro that does substitution

2015-08-03 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On Jul 29, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Klaus Ostermann wrote: Thanks, Matthew and Matthias. The service on this mailing list is incredible! I know it is not cbn because it is local, but a better name didn't come to

Re: [racket-users] http connection errors on pkg-build

2015-08-01 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Possibly related? http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/doc/pollen fails with a 403 forbidden. Maybe some s3 permissions changed? On August 1, 2015 8:54:11 AM PDT, Matthew Butterick m...@mbtype.com wrote: For the last couple of days my pollen builds have failed with this connection failed error. I

[racket-users] Intro Projects

2015-07-28 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Hi All, What is the current status of the intro projects wiki page at ( https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects)? Is it kept current? I'm looking for ways to contribute to the community, and to better get my feet wet. I have a few random project ideas that, while interesting to me, are