re details. Slide 87 shows a
> solution to this problem.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 1:12 PM Bertrand Augereau
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> not sure if this is the good place to ask about this but I couldn't
>> find a good location so I&
Hello everybody,
not sure if this is the good place to ask about this but I couldn't
find a good location so I'm asking for help here, after all it's
strongly connected to Racket :)
I'm trying to reverse-engineer some specific piece of hardware with
the help of Rosette, to discover if it can help
>
> I believe game libraries in C also implement their own 3x3 matrices rather
> than using BLAS/LAPACK. BLAS can handle very large matrices and
> makes an effort to give good results even for ill-conditioned matrices.
>
They sure do. Generally as 4x4 or implicit homogeneous 4x3 matrices to help
l
I'm just adding noise, but I just wanted to thank you for sharing your
plans, it's much appreciated, even when we don't answer in general.
Yep, told you so. Noise :)
Le jeu. 30 juil. 2020 à 14:46, Matthew Flatt a écrit :
>
> With the improvements in the upcoming v7.8 release, Racket CS provides
he workaround of a
> getter function, but with an identifier macro to hide the function from the
> person using the mutable identifier.
>
> Alex Knauth (mobile)
>
> > On Feb 17, 2020, at 7:22 PM, Ben Greenman
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/20, Bertrand Augereau w
Hello and thank you Ben for the explanation,
I had already implemented the workaround, I'll keep it :)
It seems that wrapping every binding access in a function is seen as
unnecessary in Scheme and Common Lisp ("Reference needed" :) ) but
it's a tool I use a lot in my favorite statically typed lan
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to gradually type my script to make it a proper app (yes
I'm a static-ish guy) and I have an issue (Racket 7.6 CS).
===
racket_mod.rkt:
#lang racket
(provide (struct-out s))
(provide list-of-s)
(provide set-list-of-s!)
(
> At Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:46:06 +0100, Bertrand Augereau wrote:
> > You're right, but wouldn't using the posix_spawn family have better
> > semantics, better performance, and would allow to unify between POSIX and
> > Windows behaviours nicely ? :)
>
> It's
Hi Matthew,
> Currently, if fork() fails on Unix (e.g., because there are too many
> processes), then `subprocess` will raise an exception. But if fork()
> succeeds, then there's normally no way to communicate an error from
> exec() except through the exit code, since exec() is in the child
> pr
> I'm not sure I completely understand the problem. You're correct that
> there's no way to tell whether the value is an exit code from the program
> or an error from the operating system ... but there also is no way to tell
> that starting the program from the shell IF you rely solely on the ex
> The 1st value returned by (subprocess) is an opaque reference to the
> executing process. If you pass the reference to (subprocess-status) it
> will return *'running* if the process currently is executing, or the
> exit/error value.
>
"exit/error value" is the issue there.
(subprocess-st
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to drive a WIN32 application from a Racket gui app to provide
the QA guys a simple way to interact with it. So far I'm quite successful
but I'm having a little issue.
I spawn my subprocess with subprocess :
https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/subprocess.html
And f
12 matches
Mail list logo
