At 2018-05-16T14:56:00-04:00, John Clements wrote:
> In a quick scan of the existing quasi-documentation for ssax.rkt,
> make-parser was the only one that looked to me like it might
> productively be used from outside.
`ssax:read-pi-body-as-string' is another identifier from sxml/ssax/ssax,
One of my favorite small things about Racket is that is permits almost
anything to be an identifier -- allowing you to use whatever natural
names you prefer.
In addition to Unicode, identifiers can start with a number:
(define 100-continue? "✓")
In the rare case where an identifier wouldn't
At 2018-05-17T11:11:26-04:00, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> One gotcha, which I remember confusing myself with, early on:
>
> (define 'foo "foo")
> '1 ;"foo"
> '2 ;"foo"
>
> Huh? That's because 'foo is reader shorthand for (quote foo). So the
> above is actually:
>
> (define (quote
One strategy for SXML-related support would be for the Racket community
to collectively do all 3 of these:
1. Treat the monolithic `sxml` package of Oleg's various SXML-related
tools remaining pretty frozen in its current state. This will be the
"raw, classic, everything" package. It will be
Honestly, reading that snippet … suggests to me that make-parser might not
actually be useful without all of the other internal ssax functions, and that
perhaps make-parser really shouldn’t be exported, after all :). Is it possible
to formulate productive uses of make-parser that don’t require
N. Raghavendra wrote on 05/17/2018 03:29 PM:
I think 3 is the most attractive possibility,
Agreed. #1 and #2 are for gracefully handling backward compatibility,
and for accommodating a decentralized volunteer model.
One way that #2 is volunteer-friendly is that, I suggest, for example,
At 2018-05-17T13:40:47-04:00, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> One strategy for SXML-related support would be for the Racket
> community to collectively do all 3 of these:
>
> 1. Treat the monolithic `sxml` package of Oleg's various SXML-related
> tools remaining pretty frozen in its current state. This
At 2018-05-17T12:45:50-04:00, John Clements wrote:
> Honestly, reading that snippet … suggests to me that make-parser might
> not actually be useful without all of the other internal ssax
> functions, and that perhaps make-parser really shouldn’t be exported,
> after all :).
If you wish, pending
im trying to create a (start new game) button to refresh the game (clean
board).. attached is the code i have
I have already created a reset button that closes the whole game window but
i just want it to wipe the previous game data and start new game.
Thankyou in advance.
--
You received this
9 matches
Mail list logo
