Say I have two files, "file-a.rkt" and "file-b.rkt" that each contain a
submodule test, like so:
Contents of "file-a.rkt":
#lang racket/base
(define (my-function) 'apple)
(module+ test
(require "file-b.rkt")
(other-function))
Contents of "file-b.rkt":
#lang racket/base
(define (othe
On 05/27/2018 03:10 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
At Sun, 27 May 2018 14:21:27 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
We do not expect Racket users to see a big difference between Racket
v6.12 and Racket v7.0.
I once saw in some text file that extflonums will not make it to Racket on
Chez.
Will
At Sun, 27 May 2018 15:42:28 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> What will happen to the performance of expander, though?
> IIUC, the present C expander will be gone in Racket 7 and replaced
> with a new expander written in Racket. While Chez runtime
> users will enjoy the Racket performance boost that w
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:02:39PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The next release of Racket will be version 7.0:
>
> * Version 7.0 is a milestone on our path to replace the old,
> C-implemented runtime system with Chez Scheme.
>
> * As such, version 7.0 reflects MAJOR INTERNAL CHANGES that make
Modules cannot refer to each other in a cyclic fashion, including submodules. —
Matthias
> On May 27, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Brandon Irizarry
> wrote:
>
> Say I have two files, "file-a.rkt" and "file-b.rkt" that each contain a
> submodule test, like so:
>
>
> Contents of "file-a.rkt":
>
> #l
I was perusing the Racket organization GitHub and noticed many of the repos
do not have descriptions, URLs, and READMEs.
I think this would be nice if each Racket package had a README with a link
to the documentation (on r-l.org) and maybe a copy-paste from the
scribblings of its synopsis.
Wou
Yes, PRs for this sort of thing would definitely be welcome.
Sam
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Winston Weinert wrote:
> I was perusing the Racket organization GitHub and noticed many of the repos
> do not have descriptions, URLs, and READMEs.
>
> I think this would be nice if each Racket pack
I agree! Thank you for offering.
One thought, tho: we probably don't want to duplicate information (as
it will probably get out of sync).
Robby
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> Yes, PRs for this sort of thing would definitely be welcome.
>
> Sam
>
> On Sun, May 27,
8 matches
Mail list logo