I have been trying to create a simple GUI with the racket/gui library. For
the most part it works but alongside my GUI it also creates a command line
window. You can see a screenshot of this in the attached picture. I found
this discussion when I searched for a solution:
Does it change anything if you use #lang racket/gui instead of #lang racket
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM Philip Benade
> Hi All
> I have been trying to create a simple GUI with the racket/gui library. For
> the most part it works but alongside my GUI it also
I cannot reproduce this. If I create the executable from the command line
using "raco exe --gui work-timer.rkt", or from DrRacket specifying GRacket
as the "base", the console window does not show up.
If I create the executable using "raco exe work-timer.rkt" or by specifying
Unfortunately no, nothing changes.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 11:47:28 UTC+2, Laurent wrote:
> Does it change anything if you use #lang racket/gui instead of #lang
> racket (require racket/gui)?
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM Philip Benade > wrote:
>> Hi All
I managed to get it working. Updating Dr.Racket to 7.7 did the trick. I
should have thought of it sooner, but I became so wrapped up in looking for
the problem in my code I didn't think of it.
Thank you for your help.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 11:50:58 UTC+2, Alex
It might be easiest to just use the `image?` predicate from inside the
sandbox. Get it out the same way you got the image itself out.
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:22 PM Stephen Foster
> The following returns #f and #t. How can I get it to return #t and #t?
> Context: I want to
The following returns #f and #t. How can I get it to return #t and #t?
Context: I want to allow students to run Racket code on my server. But when
I sandbox their code, I am getting back something that doesn't behave like
a 2htdp/image object. I'm not exactly sure what it is.
searching through a bunch of different packages I noticed that the
code/download links are quite inconsistent.
For some packages there is a download button clicking that button does
nothing (in firefox) because it contains a git:// protocol url, here is an
I think the best way to implement what you describe for a "better
version" is as follows:
Expand `(instance h1 half-adder-arch)` into something like
(define-syntax h1 (half-adder-arch-info))
Where `half-adder-arch-info` is an expansion-time structure describing
Then the `assign`
Le mardi 26 mai 2020 21:41:14 UTC+2, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt a écrit :
> I think the best way to implement what you describe for a "better
> version" is as follows:
> Expand `(instance h1 half-adder-arch)` into something like
> (define-syntax h1 (half-adder-arch-info))
I have seen this
Okay, I could just be putting my foot in my mouth, here, but it sounds like
you’re describing the kinds of things that are typically done by a
type-checker. Have you considered adding a type-checking pass? It would contain
an environment that maps names like “h1” to “types” that indicate that
Le mardi 26 mai 2020 03:59:59 UTC+2, johnbclements a écrit :
> > So far, I have made two attempts to work around these issues: (1) by
> creating a metamodel-like data structure using Racket structs, and
> transforming syntax objects into struct instances; or (2) using syntax
> objects only
Le mardi 26 mai 2020 21:45:21 UTC+2, johnbclements a écrit :
> In your case, the type checker would also be “resolving” lightweight
> expressions like (assign (h1 a) a) into fully-decorated expressions like
> (assign (port-ref half-adder h1 a) (port-ref full-adder a)) .
> Does this make
> On May 26, 2020, at 21:36, Robert Postill wrote:
> One thing that troubled me was that the tests seemed to be dependant on the
> package already being installed.
I think this is very common within the Racket ecosystem. I would guess that
very few packages are consciously designed to be
Inspired by the reply to
decided to ask the question here. So a little background to the
discussion. I've been looking at a racket package, and the package has a
couple of collections. It's
I am personally confused about what you think the problem is, so I just
want to make sure that you know that you can develop and test a new
package, or you can modify an existing package and test the modifications,
without publishing the package.
Basically in Racket you can:
* create a new
Mail list logo