On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:20 -0500, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Nate,
It depends on how you want to generate those menus. r:navigation is
best for single list navigation menus that have highlighting, not nested
menus. However, assuming you'll be generating the navigation from the
page structure,
I am, great job of moving it to git. Very easy to get and install. I
thought maybe there are some requirements like imagemagick and
rmagick. I don't have those gems installed so if they're needed it
makes sense, I guess. If they are needed seems like it would be a
good idea to add that
Given that nested list, there are a number of sites that show how to do
the 'suckerfish' pull-downs using ONLY CSS.
Sean Cribbs said the following on 27/05/08 11:20 AM:
Nate,
It depends on how you want to generate those menus. r:navigation is
best for single list navigation menus that have
I'm trying to find a room share for Thursday thru Sunday. Anyone have
a spare bed that would like to split the cost?
Thanks,
Victor
Sent from my iPhone
Victor Cosby
Independent Software Consultant and Web Developer
Cosby Ventures LLC
t. 206.399.0971
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Spring a BSD Server or a shared accelerator? Don't take my word
about mini_magick, it worked when I was still on a BSD server.
On May 27, 2008, at 6:30 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
That's sad news about mini_magick not working at Joyent even if you
freeze it in. I guess the available gems
Shared accelerator. Seems like the BSD servers were loaded with
almost every gem out there. Not sure why but the new servers are more
bring your own.
On May 27, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Keith Bingman wrote:
Is Spring a BSD Server or a shared accelerator? Don't take my word
about mini_magick,
Keith, just curious: How does Paperclip differ from attachment_fu? It
seems to have almost the exact same interface - is the only difference
that paperclip does not require rmagick, mini-magick or imagescience?
Casper Fabricius
http://casperfabricius.com
On 27/05/2008, at 18:19, Keith
Well, only css and a little javascript. My query was about finding the
most Radiant way to do it. Sean's solution got me through the list
generating part, now it's up to me for the styling. I am aware of the
various 'suckerfish' implementations. What I am not familiar with is the
radius way
It is actually pretty different than attachment_fu. It doesn't require
it's own model, just a few columns. It is a lot lighter weight. I
actually like attachment_fu a lot, but it is a bit slow and it
requires either RMagick, Mini_magick or Image Science, all of which
are problematic. So I
Based on some feedback that I've gotten from the list (thanks all!),
I've added some new functionality and improved the existing.
NEW FEATURES
1. Added r:stylesheet and r:javascript tags for use in pages.
Based on the attributes, these tags will render:
* The url to a css or
nurilized wrote:
is there any way to call js/css files from anywhere of the page/layout?
suppose, i use one template and many subpages?
but i use different/extra css/js files on subpages (and also common), for
example i will use accordion script on a subpage and putting this on
template or on
I just tried out your extension. Nice idea. I've always liked how
the css file was exposed under pages but I really hadn't thought of it
having it's own section either. Also, I've always wondered where to
put my js files. I usually just tucked them in the javascript folder
and
Thanks, Josh!
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Josh French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does Radiant plays well with rails
plugins? I recall something about differences in the file structures
creating incompatibilities.
Dan,
Rails plugins (or the majority of them) work just fine under
Anton Aylward wrote:
There __ARE__ pure CSS pull-downs.
Anton, I couldn't get to the link you provided so just in case I wanted
to make sure you and others were aware that you do need a bit of
javascript with suckerfish menus if you plan to support IE 6 or lower
(they only support the
Ruslan,
Chances are unless it's a VPS, they won't let you update rubygems.
Otherwise, try 'sudo gem update --system'.
Sean
Ruslan Gomez wrote:
I'm installing Radianr CMS on Mediatemple.
Everything had turn out perfect until:
RAILS_ENV=production rake db:bootstrap
which gave me
Radiant
Thanks for the feedback Steven. I'm really interested in making this a
usable extension for all.
I always used pages for my js and css files too and, like you, never had
more than a handful of each -- it wasn't much of a bother to do. So,
when John first mentioned the idea to me I really
I must admit that assets that don't happen to include images is a
bit long. I kind of like text assets. That kind of opens it up to
include other types of files that people may want to put there
like .xml or maybe even a .as file. One thing that would be nice
about putting them
I've been using this interface a lot lately and one thing that would
make it much better for me is not having the page refresh when I hit
save and continue editing. This is especially true when I'm editing
a long CSS file, I hate to image how much time I wasted looking for
the place I was
I've also noticed that all the admin pages have the same title so when
I'm working on multiple pages in tabs I can never tell which is
which. If the admin pages were titled what they were it would make it
easier to keep track of them.
Regards,
Steven
19 matches
Mail list logo
