Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread Thomas Watson Steen
Well... As the link explains, the 'caps' span is there so that we can style acronyms. This is very strange to me. How come the people who implementet this didn't use the already existing tag in HTML for this? http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_acronym.asp Regards Thomas Watson http://justa

Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread Anton Aylward
Thomas Watson Steen said the following on 06/06/08 09:05 AM: > Well... As the link explains, the 'caps' span is there so that we can > style acronyms. This is very strange to me. How come the people who > implementet this didn't use the already existing tag in > HTML for this? > > http://ww

Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread Sean Cribbs
Thomas, I agree, but perhaps not everything in caps would be an . You can achieve the effect by putting something in parentheses after the term. Example: HTML(HyperText Markup Language) produces HTML Sean Thomas Watson Steen wrote: Well... As the link explains, the 'caps' span is there

[Radiant] newsletter extension and gmail sending limits

2008-06-06 Thread nurilized
I have been using newsletter for some time, but havent sent a newsletter yet although there is 800+ mails in db problem is that the mails that i have sent (via postfix) as test did not go to hotmail users (gmail accepted tho) alternatively i started google apps but it has some sending limits 500/

Re: [Radiant] newsletter extension and gmail sending limits

2008-06-06 Thread Sean Cribbs
Maybe you should look into something like CampaignMonitor? I don't know if that will help but it has been mentioned positively multiple times in my presence. Sean nurilized wrote: I have been using newsletter for some time, but havent sent a newsletter yet although there is 800+ mails in db

Re: [Radiant] newsletter extension and gmail sending limits

2008-06-06 Thread brian
A lot of this can have to do with Reverse DNS and SPF records on your mail domain. AOL and hotmail will both flag these if not configured directly. You can test this by sending a HELO message to many test services to see if your machine is configured correctly for mail, that is if it has

Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 08:16 -0500, Sean Cribbs wrote: > Thomas, > > I agree, but perhaps not everything in caps would be an . You > can achieve the effect by putting something in parentheses > after the term. Example: But, however, if I don't want to use an acronym for something like a TV st

Re: [Radiant] Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor released.

2008-06-06 Thread Josh Schairbaum
I had trouble running the rake radiant:extensions:fckeditor:update task. It copied a bunch of files until this error: No such file or directory - .../radiant/vendor/extensions/fckeditor/ public/javascripts/fckcustom.js From the looks of it, the only thing in this fckeditor/public/ javascript

[Radiant] Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor released.

2008-06-06 Thread Daniel Collis-puro
Josh Schairbaum wrote: > I had trouble running the rake radiant:extensions:fckeditor:update task. > > It copied a bunch of files until this error: > > No such file or directory - .../radiant/vendor/extensions/fckeditor/ > public/javascripts/fckcustom.js > > From the looks of it, the only thing

Re: [Radiant] Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor released.

2008-06-06 Thread Josh Schairbaum
Thanks, I got it all setup. You mentioned in the README that you want to provide an interface to change the default toolbar, if I wanted to do it manually for now where would I do it? I think I just need to do: FCKConfig.toolbarSetName = "Basic"; in fckconfig.js. Is that correct? On Jun

[Radiant] Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor released.

2008-06-06 Thread Daniel Collis-puro
This has been fixed, details at: http://github.com/djcp/radiant-fckeditor/commit/6f601b0b1089eec5ef6cca06c7a9728f79511760 You should be able to "git pull" from the fckeditor extension directory and run the "rake radiant:extensions:fckeditor:update" task again. Thanks for hanging in there. --DJ

[Radiant] Re: Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor relea

2008-06-06 Thread Daniel Collis-puro
Josh Schairbaum wrote: > Thanks, I got it all setup. You mentioned in the README that you want > to provide an interface to change the default toolbar, if I wanted to > do it manually for now where would I do it? > > I think I just need to do: FCKConfig.toolbarSetName = "Basic"; in > fckconfig.js

Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread Jason Garber
Read the RedCloth rdoc. There's a no_span_caps restriction/accessor in both 3.0.4 and the forthcoming 4.0. On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 08:16 -0500, Sean Cribbs wrote: Thomas, I agree, but perhaps not everything in caps would be an . You c

Re: [Radiant] Re: Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor relea

2008-06-06 Thread Josh Schairbaum
Sorry to keep going this thread going, but I've changed that file, but it stills appears to be pulling the Default toolbar set. Do I need to regenerate the configs with rake task? In fact, I'm not even seeing the "simple" toolbar you have setup, although I do have a link for config?class_

[Radiant] Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANN] radiant-fckeditor 0.5 WYSIWYG Editor r

2008-06-06 Thread Daniel Collis-puro
Josh Schairbaum wrote: > Sorry to keep going this thread going, but I've changed that file, but > it stills appears to be pulling the Default toolbar set. Do I need to > regenerate the configs with rake task? In fact, I'm not even seeing > the "simple" toolbar you have setup, although I do have a

Re: [Radiant] Textile in Radiant

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:11 -0400, Jason Garber wrote: > Read the RedCloth rdoc. There's a no_span_caps restriction/accessor > in both 3.0.4 and the forthcoming 4.0. Thanks. I'll look into it. ~Nate ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantc

[Radiant] Rspec version error

2008-06-06 Thread Marty Haught
Does anyone else get the incompatible version error when running rspec for their extensions? I can get it to run fine from command line but if I run it through Textmate, I get the error. I do have rspec installed as a gem which is why the version is off. If I uninstall rspec then Textmate has is