[Radiant] Roles that allow different users to edit different parts of the page tree

2010-05-13 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Hi, I have the following problem: My customer has a different departments. So they want different roles for editors that work in the "products" department and for editors that work in the "services" department. Those roles should enable the administrator to allow certain users only to edit pages

[Radiant] Re: Roles that allow different users to edit different parts of the page tree

2010-05-14 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Hi John, that's great. Did you happen to share the source code for this somewhere? Github, maybe? That would be great :) Cheers, Johannes On May 13, 7:03 pm, john wrote: > On May 13, 10:16 am, Johannes Fahrenkrug > wrote: > > > My customer has a different departments. So

[Radiant] Re: Roles that allow different users to edit different parts of the page tree

2010-05-20 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
th sqlite then you should be > able to just clone the repo, cd into it and then run ./script/server > to get going. > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > > wrote: > > Hi John, > > > that's great. Did you happen to share the sourc

[Radiant] Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1?

2011-07-04 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Hi, we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and snippets. Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this performance

[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1?

2011-07-07 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
p figure it > out? > > Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation > like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the > edge. > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > wrote: > > Hi, > > &

[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]

2011-07-11 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: > Hi Jim, > > thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what > information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower

[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]

2011-07-11 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay wrote: > Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > > > >

[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]

2011-07-13 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Jim, if you can point me in the right direction I can look at this myself, too. Cheers, Johannes On Jul 11, 2:31 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: > No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. > 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. > > On Jul 11, 2:23

[Radiant] Re: Performance worse when moving to Radiant 0.9.1? [DEMO PROJECT]

2011-07-15 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
It's clearly the new Ragel Radius parser: https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues/247#issuecomment-1578856 On Jul 13, 2:28 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: > Jim, > > if you can point me in the right direction I can look at this myself, > too. > > Cheers, > > Jo

[Radiant] Script to find unused and invalid snippet references

2013-01-29 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Hi, I've created a small script that finds unused snippets in your pages, layouts and snippets. It also finds invalid snippet references: References to snippets that don't exists. I wanted to share it because it might be useful for some of you: http://www.springenwerk.com/2013/01/find-unused-an