I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab
and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are
created with mode 666. Is there a way to set the mode on the logfiles other
than wrapping radiator in a shell script and setting umask in that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joost Stegeman wro
te:
I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab
and thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are
created with mode 666. Is there a way to set the mode on the logfiles other
than wrapping
On Sep 29, 2:08pm, Paul van der Zwan wrote:
Subject: (RADIATOR) Unsecure permissions on logfiles
I am running radiator 2.14 on Solaris 2.6. It is started from /etc/inittab
and
thus runs with a umask of 000. All log and accounting files are created with
mode 666. Is there a way to set the
Hi Matthew / Mike,
Can you please explain why we are starting to get this problem.
schliebs4 Start Tue Sep 28 16:52:16 1999
schliebs4 StopTue Sep 28 16:53:16 1999 User-Request
schliebs4 Start Tue Sep 28 16:53:47 1999
schliebs4
We just started to use Radiator with 3COM's NAS. Occasionally a person get's
disconnected BUT Radiator still thinks they're connected. Radwho shows the
person is still connected. The radacct also shows the person is connected.
We need to bill people for there time unline. How can I correct this
Hello Paul -
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Paul Thornton wrote:
Hi Matthew / Mike,
Can you please explain why we are starting to get this problem.
schliebs4 Start Tue Sep 28 16:52:16 1999
schliebs4 StopTue Sep 28 16:53:16 1999 User-Request
schliebs4
Hello Andrew -
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Andrew Kaplan wrote:
We just started to use Radiator with 3COM's NAS. Occasionally a person get's
disconnected BUT Radiator still thinks they're connected. Radwho shows the
person is still connected. The radacct also shows the person is connected.
We need
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
There is no way (yet) to set the umask from within the Radiator config file.
(is this a good idea, anyone?)
I don't see any problems with it, only advantages. I know I'd like to be
able to fiddle with the default permission on my logs and such (what
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Paul Thornton wrote:
Can you please explain why we are starting to get this problem.
schliebs4 Start Tue Sep 28 16:52:16 1999
schliebs4 StopTue Sep 28 16:53:16 1999 User-Request
schliebs4 Start Tue Sep 28 16:53:47 1999
