Re: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-08 Thread Ray Brighenti


Well I can't say that I have used anything but what I am about to mention
but I have found our Ascend Max4000(with 42 modems and some ISDN) and
Max2000(28 modems and some ISDN also)

They have been nothing but stable over the past year and more importantly
the support from Aus Ascend has been great. There are a lot of people who
will poo poo the Ascend gear but as a RAS they are great, I think you will
find most problems occur when you start pushing them to do OPSF and other
fancy stuff on top of the dial ins and ISDN, but that's why we just spent
+$10K on a Cisco.

BTW anyone know of a good Cisco mailling list?

Ray

At 09:41 8/07/1999 +1000, you wrote:
Hello,

I have Cisco AS5200's, Bay 5399's and Lucent PM3 Access servers.

I've found Lucent to be the best with modem code and performance.  Some may
disagree I'm not interested in an argument I own these three brands and I'm
going on my personal experience dialling into them and from customer support
calls.

Others, I can't really compare. I don't trust anyone who has only used one
type of access server and happens to say their one is the best, it could
well be the best however how have they compared their one to others?

Order of my personal preference:

1. Lucent
2. Cisco
3. Bay

BTW: None are perfect, I can find modems that will not connect to each one
of these, but between the 3 brands and some modem tweaking I can get nearly
all clients online, if I can't their modem is usually stuffed or will only
connect to analog access servers (Usually a V.FC modem).

Regards,


Leigh Spiegel
Senior Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

WinShop Services
PH: (07) 5532 0355 FAX: (07) 5531 4846
http://www.winshop.com.au/


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 

===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



RE: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-08 Thread Andrew Foster

 That Bay stuff has got to be crap :) I don't need to drive my car
 into a tree to imagine what would happen to me :)

Whilst this is getting off-topic, Leigh did not mention the version of modem
code (shown by 'modem -v') or boot code (shown by 'stats') he was running on
the Bay 5399s.  Upgrading to either X15.1.7 or X16.0.1 and using version 49
modem code (available in X16.0.1) alleviates many modem connection issues.
There is far more to a NAS than the hardware or a model number.

(And just to be on topic, upgrading from R16.0 to X16.0.1 will fix a bug
whereby Stop records were missing the Connect-Info, Annex-Transmit-Speed and
Annex-Receive-Speed attributes for analog calls.)

Regards,
Andrew.



===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-08 Thread Felix Izquierdo

Mike McCauley wrote:
 
  BTW anyone know of a good Cisco mailling list?
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
 

This list is dead. Now is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe information
and archives in http://cisco-nas.datasys.net

Aaron Leonard and Dennis Peng from Cisco are in the list. They are true
Remote Access gurus.

Félix
__
DATAGRAMA SERVICIOS GLOBALES IP
C/ Acer 30   Pho: +34 93 223 00 98
08038 Barcelona ( SPAIN )Fax: +34 93 223 12 66
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.datagrama.net
__

ÿ
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-08 Thread Chris M

 
 
  BTW anyone know of a good Cisco mailling list?
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)

That list is defunct.  There is a new one for NAS at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Chris

 
 
 -
  IRI [Internet Research Institute,Inc.] Naoto MATSUMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 ---End of forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -- 
 Mike McCauley   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Open System Consultants Pty. LtdUnix, Perl, Motif, C++, WWW
 24 Bateman St Hampton, VIC 3188 Australia   http://www.open.com.au
 Phone +61 3 9598-0985   Fax   +61 3 9598-0955
 
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server 
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, 
 Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8, 
 NT, Rhapsody
 ===
 Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-07 Thread Chris M

 I've found Lucent to be the best with modem code and performance.  Some may
 disagree I'm not interested in an argument I own these three brands and I'm
 going on my personal experience dialling into them and from customer support
 calls.

Need to be more specific.  Ciscos with MICA, or Cisco's with Microcom?
The Microcom stuff kicks serious butt over Lucent modem code in my use.

I'm willing to believe that you see different results downunder than
you get in the US. In the US, on a "standard" 5ess switch, Lucent
modem code sucks like a vacuum compared to Cisco/mcom :)

I think the PM3 is faster throughput, but I don't have customers
calling to complain about throughput being 2% slower, but they sure
do like to call when they can't connect.

That Bay stuff has got to be crap :) I don't need to drive my car
into a tree to imagine what would happen to me :) 

Chris

 Others, I can't really compare. I don't trust anyone who has only used one
 type of access server and happens to say their one is the best, it could
 well be the best however how have they compared their one to others?
 
 Order of my personal preference:
 
 1. Lucent
 2. Cisco
 3. Bay
 
 BTW: None are perfect, I can find modems that will not connect to each one
 of these, but between the 3 brands and some modem tweaking I can get nearly
 all clients online, if I can't their modem is usually stuffed or will only
 connect to analog access servers (Usually a V.FC modem).
 
 Regards,
 
 
 Leigh Spiegel

===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



RE: (RADIATOR) Best NAS my opinion

1999-07-07 Thread Leigh Spiegel

Hello,

 Need to be more specific.  Ciscos with MICA, or Cisco's with Microcom?
 The Microcom stuff kicks serious butt over Lucent modem code in my use.

Our Ciscos have Microcom modems.

 I'm willing to believe that you see different results downunder than
 you get in the US. In the US, on a "standard" 5ess switch, Lucent
 modem code sucks like a vacuum compared to Cisco/mcom :)

 I think the PM3 is faster throughput, but I don't have customers
 calling to complain about throughput being 2% slower, but they sure
 do like to call when they can't connect.

Could also be different when running 60 channels on the Cisco box compared
with 48.  I find the
5200 a fair bit slower.  I don't have accurate figures on it, but my
transfer rate Cisco vs Lucent is generally
0.5k/s -- 1.0k/s faster on a Lucent.  A Cisco really starts to slow down
when it has over 55 clients on the NAS.

The 5300 I've heard is much better.

Regards,


Leigh Spiegel
Senior Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

WinShop Services
PH: (07) 5532 0355 FAX: (07) 5531 4846
http://www.winshop.com.au/


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.