Re: [RC] [ RC ] Why do Marxists and others obsess over secondary matters? *** *

2018-04-03 Thread Dr.B. Karthik Navayan
tell your motivation is all for the good. > > > Billy R. > > > -- > *From:* radicalcentrism@googlegroups.com <radicalcentrism@googlegroups.com> > on behalf of Dr.B. Karthik Navayan <nava...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 3, 201

Re: [RC] [ RC ] Why do Marxists and others obsess over secondary matters?

2018-04-03 Thread Dr.B. Karthik Navayan
Hello again, Billy Rojas, I am finding your views on economics important and would like to post it to my blog. Let me know if you have any concerns. Regards, Karthik Navayan On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 5:53 am Billy Rojas, <1billyro...@buglephilosophy.com> wrote: > *Ernie:* > > Marx stood Hegel on his

Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?

2018-03-09 Thread Dr.B. Karthik Navayan
; just as vital to admit that things are not certain and > > evidence still is missing, > > > In other words, I think we are on the same page. > > > Best wishes > > Billy R. > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > *From:*

Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?

2018-03-08 Thread Dr.B. Karthik Navayan
e, feel free to make use of the material on your blog. > > > May I ask the name of your blog? I'm curious and would like to visit your > site. > > > sincerely > > Billy Rojas > > > -------- > ---

Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?

2018-03-08 Thread Dr.B. Karthik Navayan
Billy Rojas, I liked this explanation of subjectivity. Can I post it to my blog? With your name. On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, 11:43 pm Billy Rojas, <1billyro...@buglephilosophy.com> wrote: > *Ernie:* > > There isn't just one correct way to define "objectivity." However, there is > > no point in getting