Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-16 Thread toby10
yobyot;485773 Wrote: .. Product suggestion: next Xmas, how about a slightly larger Boom++ with a color screen, HDMI inputs/outputs and even better acoustics? After 30 years as an audiophile, I got tired of wires everywhere and huge receivers and speakers all over my family room.

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-15 Thread christhedon
gweempose;471390 Wrote: I'm beginning to feel the same way. I just spent most of the evening trying to get my players to work properly with mysb.com, and I found the whole experience to be incredibly frustrating. Fortunately, everything seems to work just fine when I'm going through my local

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-15 Thread yobyot
Well, I just finished setting up my Radio -- which I bought on impulse on sale at BestBuy for $149. This allows me to put my Boom downstairs and use the Radio as my bedside unit. I AM impressed...by sync. I didn't realize I could get both players to play the same thing until I stumbled across

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-15 Thread aubuti
christhedon;485605 Wrote: two things: 1) Can you get your radio to sync music properly with your other devices?? I can't its 80% out of sync. 2) How are you dealing with the volume sync issue, i.e. squeezebox radio only has one volume (the sync volume) and no master volume. PS

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-15 Thread linvale
Not sure why, but sometimes the radio is out of sync with my boom (which are in adjacent bedroom and bath and are used every morning together as I start the day)- there is a delay of a fraction of a second but enough to make them sound terribele. Stopping play and restarting corrects it - and it

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-15 Thread aubuti
linvale;485881 Wrote: Not sure why, but sometimes the radio is out of sync with my boom (which are in adjacent bedroom and bath and are used every morning together as I start the day)- there is a delay of a fraction of a second but enough to make them sound terribele. Stopping play and

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-14 Thread MelonMonkey
funkstar;485193 Wrote: Worrying about Logitech going bust is a bit like worrying about Windows updates if Microsoft goes bust. Have you checked the market cap of both companies lately to quantify that statement? ;) Not even close. Worrying about MySB.com is a perfectly valid concern,

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-14 Thread funkstar
MelonMonkey;485467 Wrote: Have you checked the market cap of both companies lately to quantify that statement? ;) Not even close. That wasn't meant to be a direct comparison, just meant as an illustration :) -- funkstar my collection: *1*x squeezebox radio *1*x squeezebox touch *1*x

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-11-11 Thread jmpage2
Patrick Dixon;472529 Wrote: It was flagged many times during the beta program, but since they knew better then what would change their minds now? If they get a large number of returns due to the registration process they might reconsider their stand in a later version of the radio firmware.

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-15 Thread toby10
usch;472350 Wrote: I just don't want a device that is associated with an online service in such a way that it becomes useless if that service is discontinued or suffers a major downtime... Understandable. But I can say that with well over two years using SB players

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
seanadams;471455 Wrote: Not just existing customers _especially_ for new customers, having to provide your data for marketing purposes before hearing (free/your) music is an abysmal out-of-box-experience. If you don't like it, let them know. It was flagged many times during the beta

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-14 Thread Craig124
Well, my first impression, erm impressed, this is the unit I was originally after a while back but got a boom. Not gone into great details with the settings yet. Used the 20 percent code to purchase, amazing del from the netherlands to uk, 2 days, thanks logi. Very impressed with the sound from

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-14 Thread linvale
Having lived very happily with an SB3, Boom and Transporter and controller for over a year the radio has been a great addition. I really enjoy the interface and its inspired me to sort out my album art tags and address some of mistakes I have in the organization of my music collection. Really

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-14 Thread unclemat
Deciced. I am sending mine back. I came back home today, attempt to turn it on ended up with weird behavior, blank context menu, music not playing. Needless to say the Boom next it to it works without a hitch. It's a crap as it stands now. I might give it another chance in a year or so,

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-13 Thread usch
unclemat;469453 Wrote: Then annoyance - insisted on logging to mysqueezebox.com. Hm. What if you don't have an account? I do not intend to register with any online service, I only want to play my own music and maybe listen to some shoutcast stations by URL. I really wanted a Radio, but if

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-13 Thread Siduhe
If you want to use music services like Last.fm, Internet Radio or Napster, you need a mysqueezebox.com account and the player needs to have internet access. If you only want to play local files using Squeezecenter, you do not need to follow through on the registration process. Lots of people

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-13 Thread eap
toby10;471799 Wrote: I never thought I'd use the free subscription services either, but I'm hooked on them now and listen to them far more than my own music collection. Plus they are a great way to discover new artists that are very similar to what you already like. :) Just a

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread JJZolx
unclemat;470854 Wrote: Another changed/missing feature The SMBU had a release deadline to meet and they met it. There are definitely some bugs and some missing features that aren't talked about a lot, but I think that most will soon be taken care of. If I were deciding whether or not to

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread peterw
JJZolx;470941 Wrote: If I were deciding whether or not to return the unit I wouldn't worry so much about the software, but would make the decision based upon the hardware features and the sound quality. I expect that gross bugs like the power button not working will be fixed, but unclemat

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread unclemat
I am testing the Radio and Boom side by side at the moment. It's immediately obvious that the Boom display reacts much faster to user inputs. There is no lag on Boom at all, while there is noticeable lag on the Radio. Most offending is the power off button. Sound gets cut quickly, but display

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread gweempose
unclemat;471353 Wrote: Combined with mushy feel of the rubber buttons on the Radio, the UI experience is less satisfying ...I'm digging the Radio, but I do agree that it doesn't feel as solid as the Boom. Clearly, concessions were made to meet a certain price point. The non-backlit

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread Ikabob
I really do like the SBRadio. I think it is very solid compared to other similar radios. It has a nice cool look to it and the sound quality is very good. The functionality is very good and the speed is fine; I do not expect it to behave exactly like the SBBoom...it's a miniature. I call it my

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread unclemat
Well, I admit I see benefits of the multi line screen and some changes in the interface (like press the dial to play). But the amount of bugs in the unit is pretty annoying. Another bug - selecting an item on a random mix playlist (song mix) causes the cursor to jump to whatever relative (wrt to

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread MeSue
unclemat;470854 Wrote: Another changed/missing feature - I noticed that while browsing the library, pressing a number key on the remote does not take one to the position in the list as indicated by the letter associated with the number, but instead it just selects a preset (if assigned).

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread unclemat
egd;469609 Wrote: That is just plain bloody pathetic! I've got multiple SB3s, two Duets (doorstoppers) and a Transporter. None of these are Internet facing and I see no reason for them to be. Are these devices online toys or music players? Forcing users to do superfluous things that have

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-12 Thread gweempose
unclemat;471381 Wrote: I have not connected it since to mysqueezebox.com again and never will.I'm beginning to feel the same way. I just spent most of the evening trying to get my players to work properly with mysb.com, and I found the whole experience to be incredibly frustrating.

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-11 Thread unclemat
This thing is buggy. Was sitting idle, only to be found showing empty playlist and no button would do anything. I could not even power it off by holding the power button. Had to yank the power cable out. I am near the decision to send it back and pick up another Boom. Portability is not super

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-11 Thread unclemat
Another changed/missing feature - I noticed that while browsing the library, pressing a number key on the remote does not take one to the position in the list as indicated by the letter associated with the number, but instead it just selects a preset (if assigned). Quite an oversight. Using knob

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread JJZolx
Good observations. I don't think I've seen anyone mention yet that the buttons aren't backlit. It's definitely a step backward in usability from the Boom. The navigation of long lists can indeed be choppy. Compare navigating albums vs. navigating artists. The album navigation is hampered by

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread Mnyb
JJZolx;469582 Wrote: Good observations. I don't think I've seen anyone mention yet that the buttons aren't backlit. It's definitely a step backward in usability from the Boom. The navigation of long lists can indeed be choppy. Compare navigating albums vs. navigating artists. The

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread Siduhe
Mnyb;469589 Wrote: It is worse you can no longer set up an completely local system somewhere in the process an internet link to SN is needed. This was discussed at length in the beta phase and lots of people feel the same way. However, my understanding is that an internet connection is *not*

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread Phil Meyer
I think you should see this (when the alarm fires) -- perhaps there is a setting that needs to be changed: That wouldn't be particularly useful. Okay, nice to see what the time is, and some people would like to be able to snooze or turn off alarm, but the screen doesn't show what is playing.

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread JJZolx
bluegaspode;469766 Wrote: Pressing the Power-Button turned the radio off (showing a big clock), pressing it again turned it on and I still had the menu for turning off the alarm. So I guess the power button is not really used to stop the alarm. No, the alarm is turned off with the power

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread Phil Meyer
However, my understanding is that an internet connection is *not* needed for setup and playback of local music, if you have a local instance of Squeezecenter running. I don't think that's the case, or if so, it's certainly not obvious. It was said that setup should be quick to get the user to

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread eap
Philip Meyer;469886 Wrote: I asked about this in another thread. When the alarm fires, don't you get a menu with 2 choices (turn off alarm or snooze)? That's what is indicated in the wiki. There is a 3rd implied choice to hit the back button to keep playing the stream from the alarm

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread Phil Meyer
And also if an existing squeezeboxserver 7.4 with all credentials for network use, like my own is present. It is completely unnecessary and tedious to setup trough the device, it could just auto register to msb.com in the background. I agree. Setup could attempt to connect to a local Squeezebox

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-09 Thread unclemat
MrSinatra;469891 Wrote: where did u get a new boom for $240? thats cheaper than the sbradio with battery! From electronics-expo.com. They had it for $250 few weeks ago, and with some coupon, it came to ~$240 shipped for me. Seems they have jacked up the price since. -- unclemat

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-08 Thread unclemat
Yet another change... pressing on the remote has different function than on SB2/SB3/Boom. It plays a song instead of getting extra song info/options. Pressing + brings menu with these options instead. -- unclemat

Re: [SlimDevices: Radio] First impressions.... not impressed

2009-10-08 Thread unclemat
Another user experience gem... so to switch from a server to squeezenetwork (mysqueezebox.com now, phew) one goes to: SettingsAdvancedNetworkingSwitch to mysqueezebox.com however to switch to a local server: My MusicSwitch library Very intuitive! -- unclemat