Patrick,
I agree ride quality does take precedence, and we all trust Riv to put that
first and foremost, and they deliver. But there is more than one way to
skin a cat, as they say, so there are lots of different ways to make a bike
that rides well and is durable (the other really important
Oh, and I have to say about the Niner: as far as I can tell, it's a very
Rivendellian bike in its subordination of form to function; but true, it's
not a Rivendellian mannter of subordinating form to function. But that's
fine; there is plenty of room for wonderful, practical bikes that are
outside
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Ben Miller wrote:
> ... end of the day Grant decides what Riv is. (This is said slightly
> tongue-in-cheek, but only slightly)
>
That's true; what is left for debate is, if this is all that Riv is, is it
worth following?
I've followed
In response to the original posting by Bill, I'm going to go out on a limb
and say that the Niner is definitely NOT Rivvish (sorry).
There may be a few things or a lot that make it un-Riv, but what really
jumps out at me is the carbon fork. I mean, come on, RBW has had whole
campaigns
>
> A Rivish bike description from your 'average' rider: A Rivish bike has a
> steel frame, (usually) a leather saddle, upright-ish handlebars, an ability
> to carry a load and is comfortable.
>
Clayton Bailey (Bendite)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
It's free online:
http://www.mom.arq.ufmg.br/mom/arq_interface/3a_aula/illich_tools_for_conviviality.pdf
Go right to Two Watersheds. Don't get Mangry! (Mentally Angry, spin-off of
Hangry.)
On Sunday, October 29, 2017 at 9:00:16 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote:
>
> I’ll approach it again
I’ll approach it again for the ideas, since you recommend it. That style of
academic writing makes me instantly angry, so it might not work. :^)
Philip
www.biketinker.com
Santa Rosa, CA
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
Nope. Pure Ivan. This was written in the 1970s. Now as we face more and
more the consequences of "non-convivial" tool use (Illich includes whole
institutions such as health care, transportation, education, under tools)
his writing is taking on an air of prescience. He may not be the most
Not (yet) a Riv owner so take this with an extra-large grain of salt. What
put RBW on my radar--and keeps numerous brands off--is that the bikes all
seem to:
- Favor versatility over specialization
- Maintain a healthy skepticism toward technical changes with cost
and/or complexity
I'm sort of with Phillip here. Rivendell has been evolving during its tenure in
the cycling world, but it began based in low BB, long chain stay, neutral
handling designs, with a lean to comfortably high handle bars, leather saddles,
wider tires (limited by brakes available at the time) and
That was awful. I hope that was a translation by a doctoral candidate eager to
impress, and not the author’s own words.
To de-digress, I think a Rivvish bike has high bars, a leather saddle, and a
red basket net. It’s steel, and either made by Rivendell, or from the 80s.
Surly and Soma bikes
My puzzlement with this definition is that it doesn't really define
anything as Rivvish--you can make a case for just about any bicycle out
there.
For me, the word "convivial" works to describe a Rivvish bicycle, in the
sense that Ivan Illich defines it in his book Tools For Conviviality.
Other not-Retro Riv things:
Wide drop bars
Flat pedals with spikes
Curvy crank arms
Wide range doubles
Just thinking that as I rode home on my Saluki with wide upright bars, wide
range double x 10 speed, flat pedals with spikes and indexed thumbies.
-J
--
You received this message because
Laing hit the nail on the head for me. I like to fool around with 30-40
year old frames and components, overhauling, sometimes repainting (rattle
can, of course), etc. Right now I'm in the middle of rebuilding an old
early-70's Shimano Crane short-cage rear derailleur that I plan to install
I've seen many opinions on what constitutes a "Rivish" bike and my own
thoughts have varied over the years. At this point, I would say that a
durable, practical, versatile and comfortable bike ridden with a "Just
Ride" attitude, is "Rivish".
I can't quite convince myself that a carbon bike
I've seen many opinions on what constitutes a "Rivish" bike and my own
thoughts have varied over the years. At this point, I would say that a
durable, practical, versatile and comfortable bike ridden with a "Just
Ride" attitude, is "Rivish".
I can't quite convince myself that a carbon bike
To me a Rivish bike used to mean a highly engineered modern lugged steel
frame that was meant for riding, not any type of competition use. The
lugged thing has partially gone away, but the other still mostly holds.
I like Rivs because they disappear beneath me. No need to think about or
I biked with a friend last weekend who doesn't own a Rivendell or a Rivvish
bike. I had him ride my Romulus with albatross bars for a few minutes. When
he got off of the bike his first comment said with a smile, "I felt like I was
a kid again riding my bike!"
--
You received this message
QUICKBEAM!
"It's just a road-going track bike that can fit 42mm tires. Totally normal.
Retro. Plus it's designed specifically for two gear ratios."
"Oh is that all? I'll take two."
Philip
www.biketinker.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
I have owned 4 Riv's and my current is a 59cm Roadeo. To me "Rivish" is
finding a bike that you can enjoy riding and also be fairly comforable
doing so. Pretty simple.
On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 1:12:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> I was at Riv HQ yesterday and had a longish chat
That's where it can become a boring semantic debate. Somebody could say
'the Roadeo is a road racing bike that can take 32mm tires', and then point
to a 1963 Jack Taylor that can take 32mm tires. Still, to me the Roadeo is
unique. More BB drop, slacker STA, slightly upsloping TT, etc. Grant
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 4:21:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> I can't tell if this question is honest curiosity or the beginning of a
> semantic debate. I hope it's the former, because semantic debates are
> super boring.
>
Honest curiosity.There has been a LOT of
Great thread, Bill. I love Will's take. My own evolution as an incorrigible
tinkerer had been to detach from the opinions of others. I love my bikes, but
they are MY bikes and I get a lot of pleasure from figuring it what I want from
each one.
Jay
--
You received this message because you
I can't tell if this question is honest curiosity or the beginning of a
semantic debate. I hope it's the former, because semantic debates are
super boring.
Any of them. There is no Rivendell model that is a copy of something that
came before, in my opinion. If there's a model that
What's a Rivvish bike ?
The only place to find the "what" , is where there is no "what".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 2:09:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> Rivendell does not copy or replicate any old proven designs. They
> design bikes that have never been built before by anyone, ever.
>
Which frames in particular are you talking about?
-david parsons
--
I stand corrected by Bill.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Bill Lindsay wrote:
> If you think that list is a retrogrouch list, then I don't know what you
> mean with the word "retrogrouch". To me, retrogrouch means "I like this
> old thing, and the new thing is crap, and
If you think that list is a retrogrouch list, then I don't know what you
mean with the word "retrogrouch". To me, retrogrouch means "I like this
old thing, and the new thing is crap, and I don't even have to try it to
know I hate it".
Rivendell is not pro-friction-shifting. Rivendell
Since when are high bars "retro"? Anything but, I'd say. Back in the
day, it was inches of bar drop. You didn't even see bars level with
saddle back then, never mind "modern Rivendell sky high".
On 10/26/2017 05:45 PM, Lee Legrand wrote:
Bill there are retrogrouch aspects of it.
Bill there are retrogrouch aspects of it.
Friction shifting
High bars for riding
Riding for enjoyment rather than fast pace road cycling
Lugged steel frame vs composite
Tires wider than 25 mm (this is more bucking the system)
I view Rivendell as a company that makes bicycle for the vast majority
It is my opinion that the people who think Rivendell is either "retro" or
"retrogrouch" are taking an EXTREMELY short-sighted view of things. You
can't see the forest for the lugs if you think Rivendell is using old
proven designs. Lugged-steel is an old proven construction method,
perhaps.
Riding
Individualistically
Versus
Inclusive
Stylistic
Habituation
Or something like that...
Brian Cole
Lawrenceville, NJ
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 3:56:28 PM UTC-4, Lee Legrand wrote:
> I always thought Rivish was centered around the retrogrouch philosophy in
> which steel lugged
I always thought Rivish was centered around the retrogrouch philosophy in
which steel lugged frame, wide tires for comfort, bicycling is for
enjoyment and travel over speed, modern technology is good but the old
design has proven itself to work well, therefore no need to constantly move
with
I think there are two ways to view this question. Riv-ish could be the style of
Riv bikes (leather, lugs, bags, etc) or the idea of Riv bikes (bikes that work
for the owner regardless of current trends or other people’s opinions). When
most people say or hear Riv-ish I’d guess they think of the
My EPIC ride to nowhere is in fact Saturday. I promise I will document the
event. Perhaps even with a short film.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Good luck on your ride Saturday; it is still Saturday, correct? Let us know
how it goes
On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 3:12:47 PM UTC-5, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> I was at Riv HQ yesterday and had a longish chat with several of the
> staff. Will, Corey, Roman, Mark, and I waved hi to Vince.
The upshot is that "being Rivvish" does not mean blindly following Riv's
style. It means freeing yourself from style-following.
I would suggest that ANY bike you intend to JUST RIDE is Rivvish by default
- like being a kid again. Picasso once said:
*It took me four years to paint like
37 matches
Mail list logo