Entirely too late to make any real difference, but a couple ideas I had while
reading this thread. First, a cam shape would help with lever throw issues.
(Even though it would complicate the design/engineering exponentially &
probably make it not cost effective)
Second, maybe a segmented lever
Well the folks at RBW are known to always go the extra mile.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Hey, my kvetching about cable pull on Silver Shifters resulted in a BLUG
hack! How cool is that?
On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 12:50:28 AM UTC-5, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> The BLUG today documents a method to get slightly
> more cable pull out of a Silver shifter.
>
> BL
>
--
You
Rivendell Shark bike.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
The BLUG today documents a method to get slightly
more cable pull out of a Silver shifter.
BL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I'd love to see a geometry of the smaller sizes
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 5:32:00 PM UTC-6, Grant @ Rivendell wrote:
>
> Note to non-deacon Patrick about the singlespeeder:
> Name: Frank Jones Sr.
> Not for: 26-inch wheels! ha.
> Upslope: 3-deg
> New lug seat tube super boss
> Custom
I'm impatiently waiting for the Frank Jones. If one of the smaller sizes
fits me, I'm buying.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Returning to the subject: One of the best fitting bikes I owned was a 1958
Herse with a 56 or 56 1/2 cm tt and a 60 cm st, that measurement being c-c.
And long ago, 1989 or 1990, I got measured at REI for a bike by one of
their pros (pro fitter, pro rider -- he was on their racing team) and he
Tall, lugged, roadish frame with the filleted and curved bubbe tube? Consider
me diverted...
I’ll admit I was even more excited thinking for a moment that this could be a
one off/small batch tall mans Senor Frank Jones but the down tube cable stops
said otherwise. You still have my
Classy fillets. Biggish road frame means not being huge? 1 size fits all kinda
large folks? A 68 roadini would fly off the shelves!
-Kai
BK NY
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
I suspect no one has said anything because there wasn’t a spy photo on the BLUG
to create the typical buzz here at the cyber-water cooler
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Not only did I not say anything, but I was at Riv today and forgot to look for
it. Dangit!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
No, it's a prototype, something we'll be trying out and maybe do to a
biggish roadish frame next year. I'm surprised nobody's said anything. It's
fne, though!
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Ray Varella wrote:
> No one has mentioned the diversion attachment,
> Grant, is
No one has mentioned the diversion attachment,
Grant, is that the illegitimate love child of a truss frame and double top tube
frame?
Now the PETA folks will be after us to spay and neuter our bikes, the shelters
are full.
Ray
Vallejo CA
--
You received this message because you are
Fat tires, fat bikes, I bring you...fat brakes!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
No, I meant 610mm. World records.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Peter Adler wrote:
> 610mm = 61cm = 24" and change. You mean 61mm, yes?
>
> Peter Adler
> who bought a set of those @100mm cruiser Tektro DP sidepulls at a
> warehouse sale a few years back, decided that
610mm = 61cm = 24" and change. You mean 61mm, yes?
Peter Adler
who bought a set of those @100mm cruiser Tektro DP sidepulls at a warehouse
sale a few years back, decided that the mechanical advantage made them
unusable for stopping bikes, and cannibalized the nutted bolts to convert
the
Mixte fixie.
If I do anything, I probably will get someone to respace the 2003 Curt bike
to 120-125 mm OL to accommodate that AM hub; the hub is spaced at 114, but
the axle is long enough to take 5 mm of spacers on each end; though will
have to adjust shifting adjustment accordingly. We'll see.
Ooh, a singlespeed (the other SS) mixte. My mixte (Cheviot) is going to be a
Will-style 2-speed, so of course non-deacon Patrick is going to one up me with
a fixie. Balderdash!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
Note to non-deacon Patrick: Your size is a mixte!
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
> *That's *what I had in mind. Thanks.
>
> Non-diaconal-Patrick, who damn' well won't buy a 59, in ABQ, NM.
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Grant Petersen
*That's *what I had in mind. Thanks.
Non-diaconal-Patrick, who damn' well won't buy a 59, in ABQ, NM.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Grant Petersen wrote:
> Note to non-deacon Patrick about the singlespeeder:
> Name: Frank Jones Sr.
> Not for: 26-inch wheels! ha.
>
Yeah, the levers with the ratchets inside. Did I get the name wrong?
–Eric N
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Adam Kilgas wrote:
>
> From the drawing, the Frank Jones SR reminds me of a single-speed Sam
> Hillborne with a 28.6 downtube... In fact, isn't that the
>From the drawing, the Frank Jones SR reminds me of a single-speed Sam
>Hillborne with a 28.6 downtube... In fact, isn't that the same top tube as on
>a Sam?
...I like it!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe
Eric: Suntour Microshift?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
Campagnolo did something similar with the first version of their indexed
shifting. It was a disaster. I can’t imagine anyone wanting to stock all of
those small parts—hard enough to get shops to sell friction levers!
Another idea—also probably not viable—would be for Grant/Someone to buy up all
One last remark on this: Proof of this: Milton Friedman is taken seriously.
*"There is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its
resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long
as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in
There are many wonderful things about this forum. I've met some
fascinating characters & learned all kinds of stuff I would never encounter
elsewhere. Just today, I learned about barrel diameters of shifters, for
instance. I really enjoy the occasional posts from Grant about Rivendell.
He
"...where they provide value ..." Yes, but:
What these terms and others of the ilk mean in the context of the resumes I
write is: make everything as cheap as possible in order to give the
C-levels bigger bonuses; and I'm serious. Big companies make things in
order to get money, not to make a good
You mean like the original Sun Tour Thumbshifters have a larger diameter
internal ratchet mechanism ?
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:07:01 PM UTC-5, LBleriot wrote:
>
> the* groove diameter a little larger*!
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:51:01 PM UTC-5, Grant @
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, LBleriot wrote:
> ... then takes some of the profit and "improves" the beautiful Silver
> shifters by making the groove diameter a little larger!
>
I wonder if this would work if, instead of having a one piece handle and
cylinder/groove, the
I like all those things like "resource optimization" and "cost
efficiencies" where they provide value to actual human beings, but I still
ride Rivendells because the experience behind the handlebars is a sublime
one. I've had go-fast bikes but I keep coming back to my Rivendells
because they are
As a devout sub-10 speed DT friction shifter retro grouch, I hope Rivendell
sells a ton of these thumb shifters and prospers, then takes some of the
profit and "improves" the beautiful Silver shifters by making the groove
diameter a little larger!
Now, I gotta go and buy up all the existing
I returned to biking as a young adult and could not understand why I didn't
like it as much. I had a "high-end" road bike and the kit (lycra with pads
in all the right places). I dreaded the long rides but was happy I made it
when it was over. Then I read "Just Ride" by Grant and the light came
... Patrick Moore, who belatedly realized that "SS" means "Silver Shifter"
and not "Single Speed".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjYoNL4g5Vg
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Patrick Moore wrote:
> Grant said: "The SS project started out a dumb lark in the early 2000s,
>
Grant said: "The SS project started out a dumb lark in the early 2000s, and
has been tremendously successful. Not financially, but from the point of
view that lots of riders have been given the chance to learn friction
shifting, and if no SILVER, no chance. That's not important in the big
picture,
Sentence 3 should be "..we CAN'T afford to do everything."
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:37:12 AM UTC-8, Grant @ Rivendell wrote:
>
> All is well here with the SS2 thing. We're not oblivious to double-digit
> speed cassettes and the 1xwhatevers, and aren't even dismissive of them. We
>
All is well here with the SS2 thing. We're not oblivious to double-digit
speed cassettes and the 1xwhatevers, and aren't even dismissive of them. We
can afford to address everything and we can't afford to do most of what we
do that makes us good or special. Nothing we do makes sense
I'm sorry, Jim. I know the Riv folks personally and have a reasonable idea of
how precarious business is in today's 'Amazon economy', so I tend to take this
type of thing personally. I'll try harder.
Joe Bernard
Novato CA.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
As a tenet of this group, we've always allowed members to express opinions.
If someone genuinely dislikes all the RBW designs, this probably isn't the
group for them, of course. But not everyone has to think everything is
awesome.
Nothing anyone makes is going to work for everyone, and if
That's the point Joe, none of us are choir boys, none of us are mister nice.
Yet we are, the Earth never stops rotating and the Sun ever rises, this Group
rolls on despite it ☺
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
I've had the old Suntour Power Ratchet thumbies and they're fabulous. I think
they would be great as inside-the-bar shifters like Riv specs on Clems.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Bear in mind these are prototypes only, probably to check all the fiddly
details before going into production. I would expect the finish to be up
to the usual Rivendell standards & present well on a nice bike. As to the
aesthetic, well, if you liked the originals (which I do), these will look
Marc said: "the shape of the prototype is more suitable to bar end and
thumby duties, and could look a little awkward and stubby and maybe
slightly distracting on a down tube"
I agree that based just on aesthetics, they'd be weird on the downtube.
I'm going to pre-emptively DISAPPROVE of
[image: image]
While it's kinda cool to have shifters that can function in several
different positions on the bike, there will inevitably be compromises. With
that ergonomic curve, I would tend to agree that the shape of the prototype
is more suitable to bar end and thumby duties, and could
It's a project - as I have already stated - that has had a long gestation
period, some of it painful for the person behind it. I happen to think this is
neither the time nor place to declare it YUCK. If you want to suggest
improvements to the design, I presume "I wish the barrel were bigger"
Did you wake up on the wrong side of the shifter today? Relax man. It’s a
little piece of metal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
So you want a Silver shifter that you like the looks of to have a bigger barrel
like the Dia-Compe you don't like the looks of, which had nothing to do with
the new shifter which is "yuck." No, I don't get it. Buy a shifter you like
instead of trashing one that isn't even in final form yet.
I didn't stifle your opinion, I objected to it. It's stupid. Have a nice day.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
In order to shift my chain to the largest cog of a 10 Speed cassette using a
Silver shifter, I need to move the lever almost parallel to the down tube.
Enlarging the barrel, like the VO version of the DiaCompe shifter, requires
less travel of the lever. I happen to like the look of the Silver
I thought this was a forum where we are free to express and share our opinions
of Riv products in a respectful and open manner. Is there some rule that I
haven’t read requiring only positive reviews? I buy Riv products that I like;
quite a lot of them actually. I don’t buy their products
On 12/04/2017 08:58 PM, John Hawrylak wrote:
Is there an issue with the current Silver Shifters with cable pull??
I really don't know, but would appreciate an education. I read the
rBW description of currnet shifters and see only an issue with
cog/derailleur movement
There is for
Silvers work fine with 9-speed, and 10 would be the same throw. They're
probably not great for 11, but I doubt there's any perceptible market for a
friction 11-speed shifter. This criticism about barrel size doesn't make a lick
of sense to me.
--
You received this message because you are
Is there an issue with the current Silver Shifters with cable pull?? I
really don't know, but would appreciate an education. I read the rBW
description of currnet shifters and see only an issue with cog/derailleur
movement
John Hawrylak
Woodstown NJ
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:12:54 PM
If someone wants to express their dislike or critique of a product I think we
should welcome it. Is this a discussion or cheerleading? I think if everyone
can be polite and respectful then their should be enough room here for
everyone’s opionions. I'm AM going with "two sides to a story" and
I bet it will work really well, because Silvers do and Riv cares, duh...
Plus, prototypes are prototypes. Design is iterative.
I might be talking out of my ass here, but I was also kinda thinking the
look of these shifters—besides taking a note from the old Suntours—could be
part of an
But I'm not willing to play Mr. High Road. This thread is about the fabulous
news that the new shifter project is back on - its earlier demise seemed quite
depressing for Grant, a person I know and like - and I don't see the point in
chiming in about how "yucky" it is. So no, I'm not going with
It's just levers pulling cable. We all need to keep a bit of perspective.
dougP
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 2:47:20 PM UTC-8, Garth wrote:
>
> Sheesh, we're all big boys and girls here, so someone expresses a "yucky"
> view of the shifters that are not even in production and no spec known,
Sheesh, we're all big boys and girls here, so someone expresses a "yucky"
view of the shifters that are not even in production and no spec known,
it's just an initial honest opinion, and you know what they say about
opinions ... we all got one.
So what !
Hey, we all have our own ideas
If you need more cable pull it has already been innovated:
https://velo-orange.com/collections/shifters/products/dia-compe-ene-11s-dt-shifters
I figure that a bigger barrel will just make the shifter even more
sensitive to small movement, though. I've had good luck with Silver V1s and
Simplex
I think the point Joe is making is that many of us have been watching this
project with interest and maybe some anticipation. Some of us are fond of
Rivendell Bicycle Works and would like to see them succeed. When news
comes out that a previously shelved project is rising from the dead,
'cause then I'd be posting to another Google group, right?
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:41:39 PM UTC-5, Joe Bernard wrote:
>
> Why not buy a different shifter you don't think is yucky?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
Why not buy a different shifter you don't think is yucky?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
IME these work well with up to 10speed in the cable pull department, but I
haven't tried 11sp. I've used them with multiple bikes, derailers, and
cassettes/chains including 8, 9, and 10s, and combinations that don't
technically match, like a 9s rear derailer with 10s cassette or vice versa.
I said it before and I'll say it again. As DT shifters, these look as bad
as the old Silver shifters used as thumbies. Yuck. Why not do something
innovative and make the barrel on the right shifter larger to pull more
cable/shift more than 8 speeds easily?
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at
64 matches
Mail list logo