John,
Isn't a festschrift by definition a compilation of of works by different persons,
families, or corporate bodies? As such it would fall under RDA 6.27.1.4 and the
authorized access point would be the preferred title of the compilation, so no
corporate main entry.
Yes, but isn't that
Mac,
Hedrun said:
Corporate bodies are considered to be the originator if
A) they have prepared the work or
B) they have initiated and edited the work
What about prepared by Alpha Consulting for Beta Society? Often
societies, government offices, and other corporate bodies, commission
a
Mac said:
Our practice has changed drastically. For example, once Journal of
the American Chemical Society would be been entered under the Society.
Actually, it still is under the German rules.
RAK has a rule which is similar (yet not identical) to RDA's idea of
corporate bodies which are
28.10.2013 09:11, Heidrun Wiesenmüller:
RAK has a rule which is similar (yet not identical) to RDA's idea of
corporate bodies which are responsible for originating, issuing, or
causing to be issued. The definition in RAK is: a corporate body which
has either prepared *or* initiated and edited
Bernhard said:
28.10.2013 09:11, Heidrun Wiesenmüller:
RAK has a rule which is similar (yet not identical) to RDA's idea of
corporate bodies which are responsible for originating, issuing, or
causing to be issued. The definition in RAK is: a corporate body which
has either prepared *or*
28.10.2013 10:08, Heidrun Wiesenmüller:
The German community will need to learn to cope with this new freedom.
It won't be easy ;-)
But worse, it won't be better than what we used to have.
Freedom has a misleading positive connotation about it for these
matters. We have a conflict with
Hedrun said:
RAK has a rule which is similar (yet not identical) to RDA's idea of
corporate bodies which are responsible for originating, issuing, or
causing to be issued. The definition in RAK is: a corporate body which
has either prepared *or* initiated and edited an anonymous work. So,
Mac said:
In our practice, it is not enough to have produced the work, the work
must be official. An art galley produces as exhibition catalogue,
but the main entry is the artist, due to the reproductions of the
artist's works being the prominent feature (336 still image precedes
336 text).
Hedrun said:
Corporate bodies are considered to be the originator if
A) they have prepared the work or
B) they have initiated and edited the work
What about prepared by Alpha Consulting for Beta Society? Often
societies, government offices, and other corporate bodies, commission
a study, e.g.,
Isn't a festschrift by definition a compilation of of works by different
persons, families, or corporate bodies? As such it would fall under RDA
6.27.1.4 and the authorized access point would be the preferred title of the
compilation, so no corporate main entry.
Festschrift isn't used often
The German rules for main entry under corporate bodies differ very much
from the Anglo-American tradition, which makes it sometimes difficult
for me to decide when RDA 19.2.1.1.1 (Corporate bodies considered to be
creators) is to be applied.
Would the following types of publications usually
Heidrun said:
The German rules for main entry under corporate bodies differ very much
from the Anglo-American tradition
Our practice has changed drastically. For example, once Journal of the
American Chemical Society would be been entered under the Society.
#1: a festschrift for a corporate
12 matches
Mail list logo
