On 6/5/12 10:51 PM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
Thomas said:
The Find user task needs to be satisfied. In card catalog
conventions, the main entry heading collocates related works. Using
some sort of (standardized) method for the value of the Work
manifested means that other works can
Karen said:
One advantage of clustering, in my view, is that bibliographic items
can be clustered based on different criteria if desired. Thus
communities that have a different view of Work or Expression from the
*standard* RDA view can see the Work that meets their needs without
having to
Many thanks to Simon for this very useful roundup. It's good to be
assured that there are ways of coping with ordered values in the
representation languages.
So now we only need to adjust RDA. I still wonder whether this
apparent gap in the code (unless I've missed something important) was a
On 06/06/2012 02:43, Simon Spero wrote:*
*snip
In situations where only some authors are given numeric rank, and the
rest are ordered by some other principal (e.g. lexicographic order, or
no order specified), we can just state the constraints on authorship
are, and leave the ordering to be
I think there's a different aspect of the Find user task involved here.
For example, if one is presented with a manifestation, the user task is to Find
all items that exemplify that manifestation. One doesn't retrace steps and do
keyword searches and browse searches hoping that some new result
On 6/6/12 8:16 AM, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote:
The users that benefit from seeing all the resources that embody particular
works and expressions include those with roles in acquisition, preservation,
and reference. The idea that it's OK to not necessarily find all the resources
is an odd
But that's the Select user task at play in this discussion. Users can select
from amongst a result set, or they can pre-filter search results with limits,
or algorithms can produce relevancy ranked results. Current catalogs have all
kinds of responses. But the backdrop still would have all the
The MARC Formats Interest Group invites you to its discussion meeting at ALA
Annual.
Saturday, June 23, 2012, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Anaheim Convention Center, Room 208B
Topic: Issues in the Bibliographic Transition: Extending the Reach of Authority
Data
John Riemer will discuss how authority
On 6/6/12 10:09 AM, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote:
But that's the Select user task at play in this discussion. Users can select
from amongst a result set, or they can pre-filter search results with limits,
or algorithms can produce relevancy ranked results. Current catalogs have all
kinds of
This message is being posted to multiple lists. Sorry for any duplication!
ALCTS CaMMS Cataloging Classification Research Interest Group
ALA Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA
Date: Sunday, June 24, 2012
Time: 10:30 am – Noon
Location: Hyatt Regency Orange County – Grand Ballroom E
Topic: Traditions
I had just noticed yesterday, when I was looking at additions to uniform
titles for expressions of multiple translations into the same language,
the problems Adam pointed out in his email (I'm behind in my reading, as
usual).
However, I also noticed that E.1.2.5 says:
Precede a general
11 matches
Mail list logo
