William,
NABCEP writes no state laws, makes no regulations or policies. As such, the
only “teeth” it has is to revoke or suspend the Certification of a bad actor.
Some states have recognized the value of a NABCEP Certification and tied it to
their solar incentive programs in some way, but not al
Friends:
I tell any prospective employee that in order to become a solar electrician,
one must first be a qualified electrician. I am convinced of this point.
Being a solar electrician adds much complexity on top of the traditional
trade.
However, not all electricians are good electricians. The
1. "... license gives one the ability to do anything, " but maybe not as
well as a solar energy systems *specialty* contractor in California. :)
2. Experience requirements for both and all may be found here:
http://www.cslb.ca.gov/Contractors/Applicants/Contractors_License/Exam_Application/Exper
License Bond is now 15K
Max Balchowsky
Solar Electric Energy Systems
1048 Irvine Ave Suite 217
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
C-10 422405
760-403-6810
"Building a Better Future For The Next Generation"
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 5:01 PM, James Rudolph wrote:
>
> Aloha All,
> Does anybody know the requ
Aloha All,
Does anybody know the requirements for the C-46? I would assume if you
could qualify for that ( C-46) you could also qualify for a C-10 (C-13
Hawaii).
The full license gives one the ability to do anything, and this seems like
the way to go for versatility. "If you can't beat'em...join th
Although the licence numbers are different here in Hawaii County, They have
stopped accepting a C-60 (Solar Power Systems) all together about 2 years
ago. They now only accept C-13 (Electrical Contractor) for any PV project,
ESS or not. It was a hard pill to swallow, but ultimately it forced us to
They sprung a relatively quiet “public comment” meeting on us, held at the
CSLB offices in Sacramento last month.
I spoke (unprepared) in front of the Committee on behalf of C-46
classification as did nearly a dozen other people. There were members of the
IBEW there speaking on b
It’s totally a California issue.
On Mar 23, 2018, at 8:51 PM, Solar wrote:
I’ve never heard of C-10 or C-46. A quick google search seems to point to it
only being a CA thing. Nothing like this happening in MN.
Jesse Dahl
NABCEP PV Installation Professional
IBEW Local 292 - Electrician
Elec
I’ve never heard of C-10 or C-46. A quick google search seems to point to it
only being a CA thing. Nothing like this happening in MN.
Jesse Dahl
NABCEP PV Installation Professional
IBEW Local 292 - Electrician
Electrical/Solar PV Instructor - HCC
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 8:
Jason,
I’d like to read the .pdf you refer to if that would not violate a
Non-Disclosure Agreement. I am on the California Solar & Storage Association
(formerly CalSEIA) Storage Subcommittee.
Regards,
Peter T. Parrish
SolarGnosis / California Solar Engineering
1107 Fair Oaks Ave. Ste. 351
Sout
I haven’t heard about this but I’ve been calling for it for decades. The C-46
started life as a solar thermal license. Still is. When PVs first hit the scene
in the 80s, the CSLB, in it’s idiocy, decided that a solar panel was a solar
panel and stuck it in that classification. To be fair, in tho
11 matches
Mail list logo
