Would you by any chance know where I can get the jdk 1.1.3 RPM? I cant
seem to find it on Redhat's site..
B.
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Kevin H. Devin wrote:
|
|I had the same experience... dropped back to jdk-1.1.3 and all worked
|well. I was more interested in getting ICQ to run rather
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, GateKeepeR News wrote:
Would you by any chance know where I can get the jdk 1.1.3 RPM? I cant
seem to find it on Redhat's site..
B.
Check out sunsite.unc.edu You should be able to find it in
/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/i386.
Good luck.
-KHD
--
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Chris Frost wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Michael P. Plezbert wrote:
Exactly what do you mean when you say that it's not there. Do you mean
that you can login as root, cd to /usr/bin, do an ls, and it does not show
up in the file list, but it does if you log in as
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
I think that we (Linux users) should make them hear our voice writing
hundreds of complaining e-mails ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...
I think that every member of this mailing list should send a little blurb
to the editors at byte in regards to
Is /proc in your /etc/fstab ?
rickdman # grep proc /etc/fstab
/proc /proc proc defaults
rickdman # ls -ald /proc
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root root0 Mar 22 11:42 /proc
rickdman #
[RH4.1]
Rick
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote:
Anybody
Anybody seen this one, /var/log/messages reports /proc filesystem not
mounted. Sure enough, do a mount and no /proc. su to root and try to mount
/proc I get 'mount: none allready mounted or /proc busy'. Anybody seen
this?
-Paul
how the hell did I get HERE... and where are my pants?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just got ftape-3.04c and users can see the program /usr/bin/ftmt, but if
you log in as root, you can't. If you su to root it does work however. If
you log in as root, the file /usr/bin/ftmt isn't even there! What would be
the cause of this? I'm
Joe Klemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Mar 22, 1998 at 10:26:10PM -0500:
The "Pro" source is only for things like a web configuration
interface and some other catchy additiona, but not to the core sendmail
product.
You don't think there is any chance that they would start dealing with
Hi,
I am running redhat 4.2, and are wondering what I need to do to get ICQ
running under it. I think I need to download a new version of jdk
(1.1.5)?
Ken
---
Ken C. Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Southern California
---
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Fred Whipple wrote:
Does this imply that the IMAP server with RHL5 is relatively good?
It's as good as anybody else's. Considering that IMAP stands for 'Interim
Message Application Protocol' or some such, IMAP implementations are a
little bit different everywhere. I
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
I haven't heard of any RAD tools for Linux, this doesn't strike me as
the Unix way. If you want to use other people's functions, you know how
to do that, or your own. RAD tools are for people that want to program
without programming.
Aha, it is
id est [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Mar 22, 1998 at 08:10:39PM -0700:
Byte long ago lost anything even remotely close to "objectivity" when it
comes to micro$oft vs anything-else, and is now for all intents and purposes
just a shill for gates co. too bad, once they had informative articles
on
"Douglas F. Elznic" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Mar 22, 1998 at 10:51:15PM -0500:
e-mails ([EMAIL PROTECTED])... I think that every member of this mailing
list should send a little blurb to the editors at byte in regards to thier
crappy article. It would be a grewat showing of support for our
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 07:07:09PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote:
Paul Fontenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Mar 19, 1998 at 08:56:07AM -0700:
I have seen people using vim commands on the commandline like using esc k
and then use j and k to go through the command history,
Interesting,
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 07:09:19PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote:
Paul F Almquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 08:39:11AM
-0600:
set -o vi
you can also use / N n to search the command history
What sucks is that you can't `/' the current command line, but must move
On Sun, Mar 22, 1998 at 05:52:40PM +, Gee Gwaltney wrote:
I'm looking for rdate or something similar to have the National Standard
update the system clock. Would someone point me to where I can find rdate?
Thanks in advance.
look for the "nist" rpm. i think you will find it in contrib
Since the Tape drive on my system is IDE and there is only one,
shouldn't the device name be either /dev/ht0 or /dev/nht0? I think
that is correct...then, since it is a character device, shouldn't
I be able to do something dumb like:
echo "dumb" /dev/nht0
but when I do this, I get the
On Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 04:32:05PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
I don't know what is part of the "nist" package, but the protocol to go
out over the net to obtain the time is "ntp" (Network Time Protocol) and
it uses the TCP and UDP port 123.
a simple "telnet hostname 13" will get time of day at
I got this message, but I don't think it's really intended for me. :)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:39:42 -0600
From: Paul F Almquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William T Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network
On Sun, Mar 22, 1998 at 08:25:30PM -0500,
On Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 04:32:05PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
I don't know what is part of the "nist" package, but the protocol to go
out over the net to obtain the time is "ntp" (Network Time Protocol) and
it uses the TCP and UDP port 123.
a simple "telnet hostname 13" will get time of day at
Anybody seen this one, /var/log/messages reports /proc filesystem not
mounted. Sure enough, do a mount and no /proc. su to root and try to mount
/proc I get 'mount: none allready mounted or /proc busy'. Anybody seen
this?
-Paul
Also If i do a 'cat /proc/meminfo' I get what i expect.
I believe the latest initscripts update fixes this. Check the redhat
errata page.
Michael
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote:
Anybody seen this one, /var/log/messages reports /proc filesystem not
mounted. Sure enough, do a mount and no /proc. su to root and try to mount
/proc I
I have had mixed success with this:
try editing your /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers file and add a second server there
e.g.:
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X
:1 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X
See if it works for you,
Stefan
###
# Stefan Andreev
I tried to setup color to be added when I do an
ls -l -color
but it says
ls: unrecognized option `--color'
how do I setup the ls so that I can add color?
Joey
Linux 3.0.3 Picasso
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
Well, BIND-4 has been abandoned by the dev.team since May 1997. They
recommend that everyone run BIND-8 ("You should be using BIND-8"). When
will RedHat replace the BIND-4 in their distribution with BIND-8?
Is there an UNofficial build of it available from RedHat?
(No, I won't use the contrib
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote:
Anybody seen this one, /var/log/messages reports /proc filesystem not
mounted. Sure enough, do a mount and no /proc. su to root and try to mount
/proc I get 'mount: none allready mounted or /proc busy'. Anybody seen
this?
Yes, I have seen
ls --color=tty
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Joey Officer wrote:
I tried to setup color to be added when I do an
ls -l -color
but it says
ls: unrecognized option `--color'
how do I setup the ls so that I can add color?
Joey
Linux 3.0.3 Picasso
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ,
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
Check the permission on /.
0755...what *should* it be...it was a standard install of 5.0.
Damo
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata
OK! Got it working.
Peter, hope this message finds you clear of the problems that plagued
the both of us last week, in case it didn't, here's what's up.
Your ez-bios software may differ from the ez-drive utility that I am
using... with that
in mind.
1. I decreased the size of the root
Well, guess I deserve what I got for sharing root access with someone I
trusted.
They inadvertantly changed alot of permissions and now its not possible to
su to any other username (including root) from any other account
(previously, anyone could provided they had the password for that
Wow...
How do you go about fixing something like this?!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/23/98 04:09 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Joe Ferguson)
Subject: Never share root
Well, guess I deserve what I got for sharing root access with someone I
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Ken Arck wrote:
Well, guess I deserve what I got for sharing root access with someone I
trusted.
They inadvertantly changed alot of permissions and now its not possible to
su to any other username (including root) from any other account
(previously, anyone could
Small update on my problem..Seems some directory ownership and groups were
changed as well.. sigh
I've fixed some of them as I remember them being. Now when trying to su
from one account to any other, the message is
su: cannot set groups: Operation not permitted
Would I just be better
What versions of pppd have been succesfully installed/compiled on redhat 5
without other upgrades.
I tried compiling 2.2.0g, but kept getting errors.
I tried 2.2.0g-mschap.i386.rpm, but it wouldn't install, reporting errors.
I tried 2.2.0g-mschap.src.rpm, but could not find where the files were
Hi,
I just installed RH 5.0 on a 486 with a 200 Meg HD yesterday with
RH
5.0. I am applied the #5 patch to diald and I upgraded the ppp rpm
from the one found in the updates directory on the RH website.
I used the diald script that I had on my 4.2 box and
Anybody seen this one, /var/log/messages reports /proc filesystem not
mounted. Sure enough, do a mount and no /proc. su to root and try to mount
/proc I get 'mount: none allready mounted or /proc busy'. Anybody seen
this?
Yes, I have seen this (get it often) but /proc is
As for lightning, I live in the bullseye of "most struck" northern hemisphere
area, near Lakeland, Florida. The voltage from lightning is defined as a) Direct
Hit-
This has come out of the blue sky and there is not much hope for survival of
people
animals or equipment; b) Induced Voltage - Any
0755...what *should* it be...it was a standard install of 5.0.
Damo
Actually it shoulld be 555 and it is...
-Paul
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To
38 matches
Mail list logo
