On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Fred Whipple wrote:
Does this imply that the IMAP server with RHL5 is relatively good?
It's as good as anybody else's. Considering that IMAP stands for 'Interim
Message Application Protocol' or some such, IMAP implementations are a
little bit different everywhere. I
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Fred Whipple wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has any opinions on the stability of using
Communicator as an IMAP4 client and the IMAP4 server that comes with RHL
Communicator's IMAP support just isn't very good. No matter what server
you use, Communicator will foul things
William T Wilson wrote:
Communicator's IMAP support just isn't very good. No matter what server
you use, Communicator will foul things up from time to time.
Does this imply that the IMAP server with RHL5 is relatively good?
On the Windows end, I BELIEVE that recent versions of Eudora and
