-Original Message-
From: James D. Parra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Redhat-List (E-mail)
Subject: Single login server for windows and Linux
Hello,
What is the best method to have one central Linux server handling login
authentication
Hello,
What is the best method to have one central Linux server handling login
authentication for Linux and windows machines?
What I would like to achieve is;
1) Provide only network server logins for Linux boxes and have no local
accounts on any Linux machine.
2) Have /home/$USER reside on
Subject: Single login server for windows and Linux
Hello,
What is the best method to have one central Linux server handling login
authentication for Linux and windows machines?
What I would like to achieve is;
1) Provide only network server logins for Linux boxes and have no local
accounts
On Thursday 11 September 2003 08:02 pm, TOM DOLCE wrote:
I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I
entered e on boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added single'
to the end of it, then b to boot into single user mode. However, instead
of going to single user
I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I
entered "e" on boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added "single' to the
end of it, then "b" to boot into single user mode. However, instead of going to
single user modethe system says:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 17:02, TOM DOLCE wrote:
I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I entered e on
boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added single' to the end of it, then
b to boot into single user mode. However, instead of going to single user mode
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:02:53 -0700
TOM DOLCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I entered e on
boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added single' to the end of it, then
b to boot into single user mode. However, instead of going
I've tried many combinations to pass single quotes to a command in bash,
but I just can't get it to work. Basically, I want to run the following
script (abbreviated for simplicity):
script.sh dir1 dir2
#!/bin/bash
UNISON=unison $1
RUN=$UNISON -ignore 'Path $2'
${RUN}
Bash seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried many combinations to pass single quotes
to a command in bash,
but I just can't get it to work. Basically, I want
to run the following
script (abbreviated for simplicity):
script.sh dir1 dir2
#!/bin/bash
UNISON=unison $1
RUN=$UNISON -ignore 'Path $2
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Ryan D. Egeland wrote:
RUN=$UNISON -ignore 'Path $2'
Escape weak quotes instead:
RUN=$UNISON -ignore \Path $2\
--
The DMCA is anti-consumer. The RIAA has no right to rewrite copyright
laws to suit themselves.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
Hi, I am running sendmail (latest tarball) on Redhat 8.0.
I have one domain, however there are 2 servers. The users on server 1 are
not on server 2 and vise-versa.
How do I setup sendmail to recognise which server to send the mail to, if
the e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of using
Cliff Wells wrote:
I just talked to a friend of mine. He informs me that if you're
using
XFS or EXT3 with ACL support then you can do:
chown -R user directory
chmod 700 directory
setfacl -R -m u:apache:r directory
on the virtual host directories. The user will then own the
directory
and
Denis Jacobi wrote:
So I either have to patch the kernel for acl support or to change the
allowed group number or think of something other. I'm really
disappointed in linux having this user in only 32 group limitation.
AFAIK, it's not an uncommon limitation. Furthermore, some Unix
protocols like
is that my system just seems to ignore this. Is there
some limit of the number of groups a single user can belong to? Cause
if I add a new user and put him in the group emma, the new user is
able to read emmas files.
I'm using redhat 8.0.
Hope someone has a solution.
Cheers
Denis
--
redhat-list
where group emma has read permission
on. The problem is that my system just seems to ignore this. Is there
some limit of the number of groups a single user can belong to? Cause
if I add a new user and put him in the group emma, the new user is
able to read emmas files.
I'm using redhat 8.0
files where group emma has read permission
on. The problem is that my system just seems to ignore this. Is there
some limit of the number of groups a single user can belong to? Cause
if I add a new user and put him in the group emma, the new user is
able to read emmas files.
Cliff suggested
) to the group emma. Bob
should now be able to read files where group emma has read permission
on. The problem is that my system just seems to ignore this. Is there
some limit of the number of groups a single user can belong to? Cause
if I add a new user and put him in the group emma, the new
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you search for a solution.
Also, you should try to focus
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:04, Jeff Kinz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
Since we're finally bringing this out in the open, I have to admit I
never liked Bob anyway. I think his needing access to Emma's files is
just a ploy to get close to her. That just
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:10, Ed Wilts wrote:
It's getting obvious we're talking about Microsoft Bob here. The last I
heard, he was a felon wanted in 36 states. Dead or Alive. Preferably
dead.
But only 32 states are actually aware of it...
--
David Hollister
Furthurnet - Free, legal P2P
Jeff Kinz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:10, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
Since we're finally bringing this out in the open, I have to admit I
never liked Bob anyway. I think his needing access to Emma's files is
just a ploy to get close to her. That just
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:58, Denis Jacobi wrote:
:-) I thought I descriebed the problem pretty good using Bob and Emma.
Oh, we see the problem alright cracks knuckles.
Well, sadly there is a more serious background to my problem. In my
case Bob is the apache webserver.
That bastard.
I
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:58:27 +0200
Denis Jacobi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
---snip
:-) I thought I descriebed the problem pretty good using Bob and
Emma.
Well, sadly there is a more serious
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Dana Holland wrote:
Yes, I'm a newbie... :-)
I just installed a fiber gigabit card in my RH 7.2 box, configured it,
and then was attempting to reboot the box. The box came back up as far
as saying that it was telling init to boot into single user mode.
I'm
Jeff Kinz wrote:
Another explanation could be that whatever RedHat is using to filter posts
to the lists may have tripped on it. Seems more likely?
I seem to remember this being a bug in the list software. Archive search
anyone?
Tony
--
Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP Key:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
Another explanation could be that whatever RedHat is using to filter posts
to the lists may have tripped on it. Seems more likely?
I seem to remember this being a bug in the list software. Archive search
anyone?
I'd
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a
common set of usernames and password that the users can use in any linux
system. Like in windows domain architecture when a username is created in the
PDC the username is valid in all the clients in the network Is there a linux
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, senthil@jadooworks wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a common set of usernames
and password that the users can use in any linux system. Like in windows
domain architecture when a username is created in the PDC the username
is valid in all
@jadooworksSent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:42
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Single login to all
workstations in network
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a
common set of usernames and password that the users can use in any linux
system. Like in windows
Title: Message
LDAP
will do this too
-Original Message-From: santosh kumar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003
7:18 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Single
login to all workstations in network
This
you can achieve by NIS or NIS+, but first
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a common set of usernames
and password that the users can use in any linux system. Like in
windows domain architecture when a username is created in the PDC the
username is valid in all the clients in the
PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of senthil@jadooworksSent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003
9:12 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Single login
to all workstations in network
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a
common set of usernames and password that the users can use in any
Naah, use ldap.
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a common set of usernames
and password that the users can use in any linux system. Like in
windows domain architecture when a username is created in the PDC the
Right now I have 1 LAN, with
172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0. with installed dhcp server in RHL 8.0.
Now, because the need of separate LAN (will be use
for acc dept) I want to add another LAN that will be
172.16.2.0/255.255.255.0.
Now, I confuse how to setup the dhcp server. Is it
possible? How
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 22:48, Budi Febrianto wrote:
Right now I have 1 LAN, with 172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0. with installed dhcp server in
RHL 8.0.
Now, because the need of separate LAN (will be use for acc dept) I want to add
another LAN that will be 172.16.2.0/255.255.255.0.
Now, I confuse
Hi All,
What is the tool that i can use to create a program which will run with a
text based menus in text mode and with graphical windows in X mode? Like
the setup utility in Redhat Linux.
I remember doing it sometime back. But i don't remember the tool I used
then.
Thanks in advance.
I believe you are talking about GRUB
Well on the boot menu, you press e key to edit the entry, then you move
down on the long line with kernel, press e key again, and at the end of
the line you add the word single.
The press Enter, and b to boot the entry.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Roger wrote
Hi
My question is as the topic, I am running RH8 box.
Thanks in advance
R
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Roger,
Assuming you meant gruB and you want to have the choice whenever you log
in, one option is to edit the /boot/grub.conf file to include a section that
has the word single at the end of the kernel invocation; e.g.
kernel /vmlinuz-xx ro root=/dev/hdxx single
Regards, Mike Klinke
I want to do some disk maintenance so I need to boot into single user mode
(I'm correct on this, right?). How do I do this if the system boots via a
grub menu?
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Center
Around Tue,Oct 08 2002, at 10:14, Jake Colman, wrote:
I want to do some disk maintenance so I need to boot into single user mode
(I'm correct on this, right?). How do I do this if the system boots via a
grub menu?
at the boot screen, select the kernel you want to boot, then select 'e
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 09:14, Jake Colman wrote:
I want to do some disk maintenance so I need to boot into single user mode
(I'm correct on this, right?). How do I do this if the system boots via a
grub menu?
Archives are your friend
http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat/redhat-list
Title: Locking a user down to a single folder
What sort of things have the rest of you done for restricting a user to a single folder (home folder) and not allowing them access to anything like /etc, /dev, etc.?
This has specific application to FTP users? We have a single test box isolated
Title: Locking a user down to a single folder
this is called chroot jail.
most of the FTP daemons support it.
my suggestion si to go with proftpd.
- Original Message -
From:
Brian Lucas
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:35
AM
Subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-Aug-2002/15:35 -0700, Brian Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of things have the rest of you done for restricting a user to a
single folder (home folder) and not allowing them access to anything like
/etc, /dev, etc.?
This has specific
sort of things have the rest of you done for restricting a user to a
single folder (home folder) and not allowing them access to anything like
/etc, /dev, etc.?
This has specific application to FTP users? We have a single test box
isolated from the rest of the world that we are testing
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 17:27, daniel wrote:
...
but instead of just running one copy of apache
it's running TEN
and the bind9 has 5 incarnations running
Neither of those are very costly. Daemons that run in multiple
processes or threads share most of their memory segments, so 10 copies
of
the server i've set up here at work is doing a lot of work, but it seems
that it's doing more than it should. it's running the following services:
httpd
named
mysql
nfs
smbd
atalk
but instead of just running one copy of apache
it's running TEN
and the bind9 has 5 incarnations
of a single service
the server i've set up here at work is doing a lot of work, but
it seems
that it's doing more than it should. it's running the following
services:
httpd
named
mysql
nfs
smbd
atalk
but instead of just running one copy of apache
it's running TEN
and the bind9 has 5
?
- Original Message -
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:49 PM
Subject: RE: multiple occurrences of a single service
| That's all normal. For application with multiple threads using
| linux's process and thread management, threads show up as
| lightweight processes.
|
| Apache is configurable
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of daniel
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: multiple occurrences of a single service
that's the thing
i need all of those services on there
(outside of trying to get all the mac users
to go with osX so we can all use nfs)
so i suppose
Thanks I will start reading
david
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/19:53 -0400, dbrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[about managing user accts for multiple machines in one place]
Is it possible to have the users use
I am in need of some guidance. I am trying to set-up a few workstations
in a proof of concept for management.
How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
david
login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
server for authentication. Or if the server is large enough, put all the
accounts on it and use the other boxes as XTerminals.
Tony
- --
Anthony E
Hi David,
How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
NIS(+). See the NIS-HOWTO. (Why the faq has the howto rpm dissappeared from
the distro? The docs cd is almost empty. Should be
in a proof of concept for management.
How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
server for authentication
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/19:53 -0400, dbrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[about managing user accts for multiple machines in one place]
Is it possible to have the users use NT authentication?
Yes, using pam_smb_auth. See the docs in
set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
server for authentication. Or if the server is large enough, put all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/21:28 -0500, Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a HOWTO somewhere on a relatively easy way to get user information
(username, password, expiration, etc.) into an ldap database? The docs for
ldap seem fairly indepth - massive
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, jayson wrote:
So now won't boot/load correctly. Upon reboot, prompts me with an error
and to enter root password for single user mode. I logged in this way
and tried to just change /etc/fstab back like original, but won't let me
write changes... says a read-only file
how would one update a file in single user mode. In a total act of
newbie-ness, I updated the /etc/fstab file and instead of having:
Label=/ / ext3defaults1 1
I made it:
Label=/root / ext3defaults1 1
So now won't boot/load correctly.
Upon reboot, prompts
hi friends
I am using 7.1 ,i need to set a password for single user mode
login, how do i ?
shyam
_
There is always a better job for you at Monsterindia.com.
Go now http://monsterindia.com/rediffin
single user mode is normally reserved for root only. A lot of services just
aren't turned on by default. As root, you can just su to the user that you need
to be, for whatever reason. and, of course, as root, you can create the user
account, and password, using the GUI redhat-config-users
,i need to set a password for single user mode
login, how do i ?
shyam
rk
--
The Exocore Professional Linux Administrator Workshop
July 18 19, 2002, Hotel Le Meridien, Bangalore.
Details at http://www.exocore.com/eplaws
-
Ramakrishna
hi ramakrishna
i think you are thinking in diffrent way
what i need to do is ,while booting in single user mode (of cource
as root user ) it should ask for root password ,usually it
dosen't(in lilo)
plese try for some solution
with regards
shyam
Note: Forwarded message attached
-- Orignal
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:36:01PM -, shyam wrote:
hi ramakrishna
i think you are thinking in diffrent way
what i need to do is ,while booting in single user mode (of cource
as root user ) it should ask for root password ,usually it
dosen't(in lilo)
plese try for some solution
hi friends
i am using RH7.1 , how i can make my machine ask password in
single user mode
thanks in advance
shyam
_
There is always a better job for you at Monsterindia.com.
Go now http://monsterindia.com/rediffin
press tab then type linux -single or linux -s
- Original Message -
From: Tom Pollerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RedHat-List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 1:31 AM
Subject: boot single user mode ??
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 23:41, Vimol wrote:
Hello:
How to boot Linux
Hello:
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
Kvimol
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Title: RE: boot single user mode ??
Vimol [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] typed in on Friday, April 12, 2002 10:11 AM
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
one method
press Ctrl+X at LILO display and enter at prompt
Boot:linux single
regards
Tom Peter
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:41:09 +
Vimol [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled intuitively:
Hello:
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
=
If you're running LILO, I believe you can just type linux 1 (w/o quotes)
at the boot prompt.
Mike
--
He may look like
At LILO promt type linux s
Abdul Moid Khan
Network Engineer
- Original Message -
From: Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: boot single user mode ??
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:41:09 +
Vimol [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 23:41, Vimol wrote:
Hello:
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
Kvimol
depends on how which bootloader you are using, lilo or grub are the
options available in 7.2.
If lilo was selected at installation time you will need to ctrl-x out of
the graphical
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 23:41, Vimol wrote:
Hello:
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
Kvimol
If you always want to boot to a certain runlevel:
Edit your /etc/inittab file. The line:
id:X:initdefault:
replace X with the runlevel you want
If you just want to boot to single user at start-up, when the redhat logo
appears enter ctrl x and at the prompt enter linux s or linux single. if
you are already running in multi-user level 3 and want to go to single
user; enter init 1.
Hope that helps.
--On Friday, April 12, 2002 1:31 PM
This Ctrl+X works for Linux 7.1. I am getting way for Linux 7.2 ???
Kvimol
On Friday 12 April 2002 07:52, you wrote:
Vimol [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] typed in on Friday, April 12,
2002 10:11 AM
How to boot Linux 7.2 in single user mode ??
one method
press Ctrl+X at LILO display
Hello,
I am very new to Redhat. I have set up a mail server and am attempting to
set up and additional mail domain. I am having some problems. I have it so
that I can telnet to the second domain name however I can not receive mail
and when I send mail it uses the primary domain name in the
Hello,
Has anybody else noticed that printtool does not seem to like printer alises
which consist of only a single digit.
We used to have our systems setup using aliases such as 1, 2 etc so we could
type;
lpr -P1 blahblahblah
to print, but whenever I enter a single digit alias it complains
"Michael L. Ibraheem" wrote:
sometimes out of security reasons i had to change the allowable run
levels to disallow that linux single
Setup a password for lilo so you cannot
edit the kernel parameters without it.
Then add a BIOS password so you cannot boot
from a floppy withou
sometimes out of security reasons i had to change
the allowable run levels to disallow that linux single
the only solution in that case is sometimes to boot
of disc but you need to have background knowledge about the systems
paritioning or else have fun guess and check
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001
Hi all,
LdO I seem to remember to have come accross a single bootnet floppy with PLIP
LdO already integrated, but I can't remember where this was. Anybody seen such
an LdO image around? No problem if it's for an older RedHat release, I just
need to LdO have a look at it. LdO
Hi Brian,
I think you were looking for this.
http://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~bubeck/bootnet-plip-62.img
Thanks a lot! That is indeed the one I am looking for. I will have a look at
it and create one for RedHat 7.0.
Bye,
Hi John,
I don't know about PLIP, but maybe it was Tom's root/boot (tomsrtbt) at
http://www.toms.net/rb/
Nope. I need a (modified) RH installation disk with plip.o and parport_pc.o
already available. I think I have seen such a disk over half a year ago
somewhere in Germay
Hi Leonard,
On Wednesday, March 07, 2001, 5:31:04 PM, you babbled something about:
LdO Hi Folks!
LdO I seem to remember to have come accross a single bootnet floppy with PLIP
LdO already integrated, but I can't remember where this was. Anybody seen such an
LdO image around
Hi Folks!
I seem to remember to have come accross a single bootnet floppy with PLIP
already integrated, but I can't remember where this was. Anybody seen such an
image around? No problem if it's for an older RedHat release, I just need to
have a look at it.
Thanx in advance
I don't know about PLIP, but maybe it was Tom's root/boot (tomsrtbt) at
http://www.toms.net/rb/
John
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi Folks!
I seem to remember to have come accross a single bootnet floppy with PLIP
already integrated, but I can't
Is it possible to compile a single kernel module?
How?
Many thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
___
Redhat-list mailing list
# make modules
# loc=`find /usr/src/linux | grep foo.o`
# echo $loc
# cp $loc /lib/modules/
From: Living Dead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is it possible to compile a single kernel module?
How?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
Living Dead wrote:
Is it possible to compile a single kernel module?
YES
How?
Oh... so demanding...
Each feature of the kernel that can be compiled as a module has its own
subdirectory in the source tree. Assuming that you've already prepped
and compiled a kernel from your standing
Oops! I guess you should put an empty line between the header and the
body. But the MTA seems to get it right anyway.
(echo "To: wilson@claborn"; echo "Subject: hi"; cat /some/file) |sendmail -i
(echo "To: wilson@claborn"; echo "Subject: hi"; echo; cat /some/file) \
|sendmail -i
--
Howdy,
I'm trying to use /bin/mail in a bash script to send me the contents of a certain file.
My problem is I can't figure out how to do the body of the message. If I do the
following:
#!/bin/bash
mail -s 'hi'' [EMAIL PROTECTED] EOF
EOF
It works fine, but that's only the subject line. I
* Jonathan Wilson [Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:40:39PM -0600]:
Howdy,
I'm trying to use /bin/mail in a bash script to send me the contents of a certain
file.
My problem is I can't figure out how to do the body of the message. If I do the
following:
#!/bin/bash
mail -s 'hi'' [EMAIL
Hi every body
I am new to linux about 4 months ,very interested in it trying to learn.
Then to set My home network on 4 machines .
My RHL-6.2 was fine on a single machine till i changed the
localhost.localdomain -to- localhost.oussama
then I go problems when I reboot;
http -- failed
NIS
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 at 10:56am (-), Oussama Dbaibo wrote:
Hi every body
I am new to linux about 4 months ,very interested in it trying to learn.
Then to set My home network on 4 machines .
My RHL-6.2 was fine on a single machine till i changed the
localhost.localdomain
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Oussama Dbaibo wrote:
Hi every body
I am new to linux about 4 months ,very interested in it trying to learn.
Then to set My home network on 4 machines .
My RHL-6.2 was fine on a single machine till i changed the
localhost.localdomain -to- localhost.oussama
then I go
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
