Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes

 On 2019-07-03 09:45 -0500, Pieter Vandepitte wrote:> The current EPP specifications do not prevent a client to perform “bulk > updates”, it’s just the clients that are not smart enough. If clients > would operate asynchronously (not waiting for a server response), the (except that

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes

.. Pieter From: regext on behalf of Roger D Carney Date: Wednesday, 3 July 2019 at 14:17 To: "regext@ietf.org" Subject: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes Meeting minutes from our quick Interim Meeting on June 11th, enjoy! See everyone in a few weeks. Meeting started a

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes

Carney Date: Wednesday, 3 July 2019 at 14:17 To: "regext@ietf.org" Subject: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes Meeting minutes from our quick Interim Meeting on June 11th, enjoy! See everyone in a few weeks. Meeting started at 11:04 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney (GoDadd

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes

Meeting minutes from our quick Interim Meeting on June 11th, enjoy! See everyone in a few weeks. Meeting started at 11:04 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney (GoDaddy), Gordon Dick (Nominet), Joseph Yee (Afilias) Agenda 1. Reporting

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019JUN11

Good Afternoon, Unfortunately we have to reschedule this meeting, fortunately we have rescheduled to June 11th, we will plan the same time (16:00 UTC) using the same Zoom conference meeting. Agenda 1. Reporting

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019MAY30

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Thursday May 30th at 16:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting. Agenda 1. Reporting

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018DEC19

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, at 11:36, Roger D Carney wrote: > I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday > December 19th at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. Were the minutes and list of attendees for this meeting ever published on this list? I do not find them, at least by searching

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

Patrick, I like how you have broken down the problem into discrete registry implementation cases that can be applied to any EPP extension. To make the core object-extension (draft-gould-carney-regext-registry) workable, we need to target case 1 (fully RFC-compliant registry implementers)

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018, at 11:28, Gould, James wrote: > > * Ensure that the hostAddr model of RFC 5731 is supported > > * > > *Discussion* > > * In the case of a zone that supports domain:hostAddr instead of

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018DEC19

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday December 19th at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting and if time allows a discussion on the Validate draft. Agenda 1. Reporting

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

Patrick, Please review the latest version of draft-gould-carney-regext-registry, since I believe it has changes that are applicable to your feedback (e.g., batch schedule, host attribute support). I provide my responses to your feedback below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018, at 13:58, Roger D Carney wrote: > * I still don’t like the use of the elements as a > “flexible mechanism to share data between the client and the server”. There are many registries going this route, and it is very sad, even if easy to understand why. It voids any

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

Meeting started at 11:03 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney, Jody Kolker, James Gould, James Galvin, Gurshabad Grover, Rick Wilhelm Agenda 1. Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) - New version to be posted this week. 2. Registry Mapping * Continue the lively

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018OCT16)

I will attend this meeting. Thanks Roger. Jim On 1 Oct 2018, at 12:57, Roger D Carney wrote: Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Tuesday October 16th at 16:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around two topics: Agenda 1.

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes

godaddy.com>> Date: Tuesday 3 July 2018 at 20:04 To: Registration Protocols Extensions mailto:regext@ietf.org>> Subject: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes Sorry about the tardiness, please enjoy, see everyone in a couple weeks. Meeting started at 11:06 (UTC-5) Attendees: R

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes

regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes Sorry about the tardiness, please enjoy, see everyone in a couple weeks. Meeting started at 11:06 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney, James Gould, Jody Kolker, Jim Galvin Agenda 1.Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) 2.Registry M

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes

Sorry about the tardiness, please enjoy, see everyone in a couple weeks. Meeting started at 11:06 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney, James Gould, Jody Kolker, Jim Galvin Agenda 1.Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) 2.Registry Mapping a.Continue the lively discussion

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (Validate Draft)

xt@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (Validate Draft) Good Morning, I will be sending out minutes/notes of the Interim meeting later this week. I agree with what Jim proposed during the meeting and here in reference to providing ids for new/existing contacts, as well a

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (Validate Draft)

Of Gould, James Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:27 AM To: Pieter Vandepitte ; Gould, James ; Patrick Mevzek ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Pieter, Regardless of that, I’m still trying to figure out the use of this extension. Will a client first check whether a contact

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Pieter, Regardless of that, I’m still trying to figure out the use of this extension. Will a client first check whether a contact can be created, then interpret the response of the check, and finally create the command. Or will the client just try to create the contact, and in case of error

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Patrick, Yes, the issue is associated with the loading of the XML schemas and validating the XML against them. There is also a potential code (library) dependency based on where the dependent XML schema (e.g., host-1.0.xsd for the domain mapping) lives. In looking at the Verisign EPP SDK,

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Maybe I’m missing something, but this draft is about validating contacts, so I don't see an issue in referring to the contact RFC. There’s no point in validating contacts, but not creating them, so the client needs to support the contact xsd anyway. Regardless of that, I’m still trying to

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, at 14:21, Gould, James wrote: > This dependency > does require ensuring that the host XML schema is loaded ahead of the > domain XML schema when pre-caching the XML schemas. So it seems having dependencies is only a problem or a difficulty when validating the frames per

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Patrick, The base EPP protocol is defined using epp and eppcom, where extensions (object or command / response) would naturally be dependent on the base schemas. Creating dependencies across extensions does not allow them to stand on their own, so my preference would be to copy and paste the

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, at 19:56, Gould, James wrote: > 4. I don’t recommend directly referencing the > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:contact-1.0 elements, since it adds a direct > dependency to inclusion of the contact XML schema and namespace for a > subset of the elements that are really specific

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

<http://verisigninc.com/> From: regext on behalf of Roger Carney Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:33 PM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Tuesday June 5th at 16:0

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JAN31) Notes

Meeting started at 9:04 (UTC-6) Moderated by Roger Carney. Attendees: Roger Carney, James Gould, Antoin Verschuren, James Galvin, Jody Kolker, Joe Snitker Agenda 1. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts * Base Mappings * Policy Extensions: how a server implements an

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

I plan to attend. Jim On 17 Jan 2018, at 11:22, Roger D Carney wrote: Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 31st at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around the Registry Mapping proposal. Agenda 1.

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 31st at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around the Registry Mapping proposal. Agenda 1. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts * Base Mappings * Policy

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, at 21:51, Roger D Carney wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > We held an interim meeting today January 10, 2018 and discussed the Fee > document. Thanks Roger for the summary. > We did not make it to discussing the Registry Mapping, we will plan to > have a follow-up meeting to

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting today January 10, 2018 and discussed the Fee document. In attendance was James Gould, Jody Kolker, Joe Snitker, Peter Koch, Antoin Verschuren, and Roger Carney. Scott Hollenbeck, James Galvin and Andreas Huber sent their regrets. Agenda: 1. Fee

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

; > Thanks > > Roger > >   > >   > > *From:*Antoin Verschuren [mailto:i...@antoin.nl] > *Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2018 9:04 AM > *To:* Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> > *Cc:* regext@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Mee

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 17:11, Roger D Carney wrote: > For agenda 1.a we will be making the decision on how works > (command or object level), so for those that have an opinion on this > topic, this will be the last time to discuss before the document is > updated. I will probably not be

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I'm unfortunately not going to be able to make it due to a scheduling conflict. Scott From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 11:11 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite Good

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Andy, Roger and I are currently working on an Internet Draft that is based on the Verisign proprietary Registry Mapping extension at https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_registry_v01.html. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

What is this? Is there an I-D on it? -andy On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Roger D Carney wrote: > > Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

...@godaddy.com> Date: Monday, January 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM To: Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl>, Roger Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite I will also be there. Thanks,

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 9:04 AM To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite I will attend too. But so far the chairs seem to be the only attendants? Are there any more people that will attend? I was wait

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I will attend too. But so far the chairs seem to be the only attendants? Are there any more people that will attend? I was waiting for some more respondents before scheduling the meeting. I just submitted the official meeting request, but that would be a late notice for the secretariat. Roger,

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I will attend. Jim On 7 Dec 2017, at 11:36, Roger D Carney wrote: Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 10th at 19:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to discuss items around the latest version of the Fee draft and to introduce a Registry

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 10th at 19:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to discuss items around the latest version of the Fee draft and to introduce a Registry Mapping proposal. Agenda 1. Fee * Discuss appropriate level for ,

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting on October 11th, 2017 to discuss the current Fee and Validate draft documents. In attendance was Jody Kolker, Antoin Verschuren, James Galvin, and Roger Carney. Alex Mayrhofer sent his regrets. Agenda: 1. Fee * Confirm Edits (section 3.8

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

iday, September 01, 2017 1:00 PM To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com>; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, I believe that we’re pulling hairs when it comes to the handling of a “quiet period”. My recommendation is remove any reference to a “quiet pe

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/> From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Roger Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 12:33 PM To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

, 2017 2:43 PM To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com>; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, I don’t believe it is clean to assume the capabilities or desire of the client when the current phase is a quiet period by defaulting the return to the “open” / g

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

, 2017 at 10:50 AM To: James Gould <jgo...@verisign.com>, Roger Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Hi guys, Just a general question for this area. If the registrar do

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

com>; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, I don’t believe it is clean to assume the capabilities or desire of the client when the current phase is a quiet period by defaulting the return to the “open” / general registration phase. When there is an active

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

The minutes have been uploaded to the proceedings. If there are any corrections please make that known and I will upload a revised version. Thanks for hosting this meeting! Jim On 23 Aug 2017, at 16:52, Roger D Carney wrote: Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting this morning and

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

gext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Roger Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> Date: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 3:31 PM To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Good Afternoon, For the quiet period, I think you provide a cle

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

, August 24, 2017 8:03 AM To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com>; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, Thanks for hosting this meeting. Unfortunately, I was not able to participate in the meeting. I include some points below based on review of draft-ietf-rege

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

car...@godaddy.com> Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> wrote: We moved the discussion onto Validate and Jody provided an overview of the problem spac