Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:59 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: Last call ends today, folks. Anything else? In my opinion, going back to hyphen and introducing "objectTag_0&qu

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > This is worth exploring. What do people think about going back to HYPHEN > MINUS as a separator and noting the significance of the character with an > "objectTag-0" token in the rdapConformance array? The

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

> -Original Message- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:45 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag > > Pieter, > > On Mon, Apr

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

Pieter, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, at 15:39, Pieter Vandepitte wrote: > No, indeed it isn't about discovering entities, but discovering the > authoritative server for an entity, basically wat is meant with > bootstrapping. [..] > So my final vote on this draft: if there's a need for "globally

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

From: Pieter Vandepitte [mailto:pieter.vandepi...@dnsbelgium.be] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:40 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag (1) I think the solution is just not

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

> > (1) I think the solution is just not right. It's a quick and dirty way of > doing these things. The right way imo is defining a new RDAP extension (with > a dedicated attribute to identify the authoritative source) > (2) In my opinion there are other, existing, mechanisms for discovering

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin >> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 9:59 AM >> To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag >> >> The document editors have indi

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

I have read this draft. I work for an agency which has deployed RDAP in a globally connected context. I would welcome this draft progressing because we are already in a situation where public services designed to unite RDAP services could leverage this draft, and I want to see strong coherence

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 12:54, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > It's OK to say, "I've read the > document and I have no concerns"! The IETF doesn't charter "lurking" > groups, people! FWIW and speaking just about myself, it is not that I am just lurking in the LCs it is that I have various issues

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:59:04AM -0400, James Galvin wrote: > The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready > for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best > Current Practice: > > Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Object Tagging >

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

I support it and think it's a good idea. Marcos Andrew Newton --- Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag --- De:"Andrew Newton" <a...@hxr.us>A:"James Galvin" <gal...@elistx.com>Cc:"Registration Protocols Extensions" <regext@iet

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

I support... but I'm also a co-author. :) -andy On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:10 AM, James Galvin wrote: > Thanks to James Gould for volunteering to be document shepherd! > > Please folks, as Scott says, respond to this message and indicate your > support or at least no

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

Thanks to James Gould for volunteering to be document shepherd! Please folks, as Scott says, respond to this message and indicate your support or at least no objection. Thanks! Antoin and Jim On 6 Apr 2018, at 9:59, James Galvin wrote: The document editors have indicated that the

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

I volunteer to be the document shepherd. Thanks, Jim > On Apr 6, 2018, at 9:59 AM, James Galvin wrote: > > The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for > submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best Current > Practice:

[regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best Current Practice: Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Object Tagging https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag/ Please