FWIW, version 1.0 of the gTLD RDAP profile (i.e., what was requested to be
implemented) can be found at
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdap-operational-profile-2016-07-26-en
--
Francisco
On 9/22/16, 2:40 PM, "Andrew Newton" wrote:
That's a fair observation. While I am not sure I r
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
> There are two angles to commercial feasibility: one is whether implementing
> RDAP is feasible; RDAP is a generic protocol that can be tailored very
> differently by each use case, and being from one of the ccTLDs that
> implemented it (
> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 17:55:000, Dave Piscitello
> escreveu:
>
> I can't process this without understanding what deficiencies are known, not
> addressed by RDAP or provably uncommercial.
>
> Assistance or speculation invited.
The RDS PDP WG has a gigantic laundry list of what deficie
> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 17:39:000, Andrew Newton escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:52 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> In article <83c4fe76-52e8-48ed-b6c2-0691555d3...@icann.org> you write:
>>> I think there are two parts to your question. First, the Registry
>>> Stakeholder Group (RySG) r
> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 15:46:000, Francisco Arias
> escreveu:
>
> I think there are two parts to your question. First, the Registry Stakeholder
> Group (RySG) request for reconsideration that triggered this proposal;
> perhaps someone else in this list (from the RySG) can speak to that.
> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 15:56:000, Hollenbeck, Scott
> escreveu:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francisco
>> Arias
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:46 PM
>> To: Andrew Newton
>> Cc: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [regex
