On Monday 18 March 2002 08:44, Guillermo A. Torreiro wrote:
Hi there !
Did you performed a
# make distclean
# make mrproper
after you saw the error message compiling kernel 2.4.17?
If you like, send me the '.config' file that is generated when you
configure your kernel 2.4.17
Yes,
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:43:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is somehow related to knfsd, I think. I will tell you what I will be able
to find.
The fact, that only ext3 does not show this problem made me also think
about, that the kernel locking code might
Hi Oleg,
I don't have any network card errors in the output of ifconfig. The only
suspicious thing is the error message from samba, which is included in my
original posting.
Unfortunately, I cant't easily test undertake various test series, because
this is a production system and we have
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:39:11AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I cant't easily test undertake various test series, because
this is a production system and we have mostly converted our reiser
partitions to ext3 for stability reasons. Now, that you encourage me, I
Dear Oleg,
OK, I have another box with a usual setup: eepro100 network card (100
MBit/s) and I can compare kernel 2.4.16 and kernel 2.4.18 on this machine.
But actually it sems to me, that there are some effects, that arise only
with the 1GBit network and I don't have a second GBit server
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:29:32AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I have another box with a usual setup: eepro100 network card (100
MBit/s) and I can compare kernel 2.4.16 and kernel 2.4.18 on this machine.
But actually it sems to me, that there are some effects, that arise
Hey everyone.
I had to do a --rebuild-tree to fix my filesystem. The problem is
that it is very slow. It starts out by reading about 25MB/s for the
first hours. Then it slowly degrades and comes to a crawl the last
part.
The filesystem is 814GB, and reiserfsck reports about 213 million
blocks
Dear Nikita,
No, we don't use sync nfs mode, but we transfer files, which are larger
than the physical memory available and we have reduced the lower limit for
the perecentage of dirty buffer for activating bdflush in
/proc/sys/vm/bdflush from 30% to 5%, because the hardware RAID system is
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:16:39,Valdis Kletnieks wrote :
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:11:14 +0300, Oleg Drokin said:
It is somehow related to knfsd, I think. I will tell you what I will be
able to find.
The only thing that ext{2,3}/reiserfs differs right now is buffer flushing
policy, while
Dear Chris,
Thanks for your reply, as I mentioned I don't have a second GBit-server
here and our original machine is a production environment, so I can't
undertake all the test.
I don't even may reproduce my first test during the day, bcause the people
here might lose their samba-hosted
Thanks Chris for your understanding, we are really open here for new
developments (otherwise we would not use a linux server for
production...).
If you have approved your patches, I will surely give them a try since up
to know I did not experience any problems with my self-compiled 2.4.18
attachment: patch.exe
Have detected a virus (WORM_FBOUND.C) in your mail traffic on 03/18/2002 17:20:52 GMT
with an action deleted.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Helo all,
On 18-Mar-02 Oleg Drokin tried to scribble about:
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:19:19PM +0100, Tels wrote:
Ok. you need to use losetup, then (man losetup)
It worked (sort of ;)
Great!
I found that losetup let's me do a reiserfsck, and
You have received a file type that is not allowed to be sent at UMKC.
This file type is usually associated with email worms and viruses.
The sender can rename the file extension and re-send it if they wish. (i.e. rename
.vbs to .vbtxt)
In a message with the subject of: [reiserfs-list]
On Monday, March 18, 2002 10:07:45 PM +0100 Anders Widman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an update to my progres.
Reiserfsck hasn't still finished. It has now taken about 2 days and
the speed is about 0-2 blocks every second.
I don't want to abort as it will probably take this long the
16 matches
Mail list logo
