David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
I'm not sure yet how much I'm willing to pay. If the Namesys people can
help me out, there will certainly be a donation headed their way,
Nah, for you it is no charge, you have done a lot for us.
What
michael chang wrote:
I've been trying to search around a bit, but I can't find any
information on the latest news with Reiser4. In particular, I can't
find any information about the current issue of Reiser4's inclusion
in the vanilla kernel (is this over?). [Last major message I can find
on
Hi,
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
floor looking at the performance of reiser4. I have previously played around
with it on a few occasions, but I never had the chance to test it with my
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
Same here. The first filesystem ever which makes a crummy laptop drive
look goo, and that's saying something.
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had a resizer :(
That's one of the main reasons I stopped
Hi.
This processor produces much heat but this is only a question of how you
cool it. The system has no troubles with heat and stability. It's a
server which is constantly running and except the mentioned problem
there are no other troubles. I can compile things for hours on that
system so memory
On Monday 08 August 2005 02:02, Konstantin Münning wrote:
Hi Folks!
There seems to be something I would call a bud in ReiserFS at least in
kernel 2.6.11.11 which can cause the system/computer to freeze. It is
caused by a corruption of the FS but at that point I expected to have
some
On 2005-08-08 14:09, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
Yes, yes, yes.
I had a DMA problem and the laptop froze several times on high
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the mandatory
condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25 too ? why not
do a little fundraising ?
From what I've heard is that Namesys are interested in creating
Repackers, Resizers, and Converters for Reiser4. However, I've also
heard the development of these could be accelerated with the
assistance of some funds.
In particular, I want to know if there is group fundraising for these
Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
floor looking at the performance of reiser4. I have previously played around
with it on a few occasions, but I never had the
I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
surely why postgres performance is poor.
Hans
Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
floor
michael chang wrote:
From what I've heard is that Namesys are interested in creating
Repackers, Resizers, and Converters for Reiser4. However, I've also
heard the development of these could be accelerated with the
assistance of some funds.
In particular, I want to know if there is group
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had a resizer :(
Resizer
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PFC wrote:
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
mandatory condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25
too ? why not do a little fundraising ?
I would give $25 before
On 8/8/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PFC wrote:
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
mandatory condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25
too ? why
how many people are on reiserfs-list? On 8/8/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PFC wrote:
If only it had a resizer :( I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
I would give $25 before it is done, only if it will be F/OSS. I would
give $25 _after_ it's done to get my own personal, proprietary copy.
How about asking Mark Shuttleworth - the rich guy behind Ubuntu.
I bet he'd be willing. And if he would he propably might consider
persuading the tech staff
Hello David,
Monday, August 8, 2005, 9:56:36 PM, you wrote:
What I want is the repacker, beacuse performance does steadily degrade
on my Reiser4 systems, eventually getting worse than Reiser3, but not
worse than VFAT -- probably because my old FAT partitions are on old,
virus-ridden systems.
On 8/8/05, Bedros Hanounik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PFC wrote:
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for
On 2005-08-08 16:58, michael chang wrote:
To get $90 000 USD for Reiser4
= = = = =
If Paypal account used on Fundable.org is owned by Namesys:
Required before Fees: $ 96550.25
Donators at $25 ea: 3863 (-- mostly because of that last evil quarter
[...]
You also have to
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had
I think we should just let the current possible big sponsor take care of
the repacker sponsoring, and I will focus on making that happen.
Hns
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
surely why postgres performance is poor.
Hans, I'm on the postgresql hackers list (although I don't really have
a voice there, so I can't really speak much for reiser4
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
surely why postgres performance is poor.
Hans, I'm on the postgresql hackers list (although I don't really have
a voice there, so I can't
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
Define visionary?
I can name a few things that work best in Reiser4, and very well in v3,
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
Define visionary?
I can name a few
michael chang wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
Define visionary?
I
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reiser4 would be great if... is getting old. It is great, and it's
getting even better pretty fast.
And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just
databases that will benefit, but also small files. After all, what
On 8/8/05, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Absolutely. I'm not knocking your idea, just wanted to clarify that
Reiser4 would be great if... is getting old. It is great, and it's
getting even better pretty fast.
(sorry for reply bloat)
I just wanted to point out.. that wasn't my
33 matches
Mail list logo
