Re: [reiserfs-list] Here we go again

Hi Chris Mason wrote: Did you change this to work so? I guess no, because this change would touch not only reiserfs_get_block but few other things. As in 3.5 - every pointer still had to exist. To be more pricise, file can have hole (no indirect items) only at its end. yes, it

Re: [reiserfs-list] Here we go again

Hi Chris Mason wrote: On Thursday, May 10, 2001 02:22:39 AM +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris Mason wrote: Did you change this to work so? I guess no, because this change would touch not only reiserfs_get_block but few other things. As in 3.5

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS 3.5.32 stability ?

Hi Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: I'd like to use ReiserFS with 2.2.19, and got 3 simple questions: 1. Are there any known issues/problems with ReiserFS 3.5.32 I should be aware of ? I would recommend few minor fixes (attached). 2. What are the differences between ReiserFS for 2.2.x kernels

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS 3.5.32 stability ?

Hi Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:12:22AM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: 2. What are the differences between ReiserFS for 2.2.x kernels and 2.4.x kernels as for now ? Except the target kernel version, of course... There are 2 formats of reiserfs

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS 3.5.32 stability ?

Hi Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:47:51PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: On a filesystem of 3.6 format you can have files longer than 2 gb and have more that 64k links to a file. If you're refering to my patch, it doesn't allow more than 64k links, only

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS 3.5.32 stability ?

Hi Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 06:41:42AM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: * there is no easy way to tell if a particular stat-data is in v1 or v2 format in link. Yes, there is. They have different length. But this information is not easily available where

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS 3.5.32 stability ?

Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: It is doable, but afaics now it looks almost useless as far as st_nlink is 16 bit even in stat64. glibc uses int for link count (all modes). typedef __u_int __nlink_t; /* Type of file link counts. */ kernel stat uses

Re: [reiserfs-list] reiserfsck fails testcases

Hi Marc Lehmann wrote: Here are two testcases (created using debugreiserfs -p) where reiserfsck fails. For the first one (which is badly damaged), http://www-isl.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de/reiserfs/md2.bmap.gz 11737 http://www-isl.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de/reiserfs/md2.gz

Re: [reiserfs-list] Lost space

Hi Hans Reiser wrote: Erik Tews wrote: Hi Can somebody please tell me what the current status of the lost space bug is? I know that old versions of reiserfs lost free space during crashes. I got a very old reiserfs here (version 3.5) How can I find out if there is somewhere lost

[reiserfs-list] hi

subscribe

Re: [reiserfs-list] Where i can find rh71iso with reiserfs

Hi You might want to look over ww.namesys.com's FAQ page. There should be a section like How do I setup reiserfs a root partition or so. Thanks, vs Abu Hudzaefah wrote: Ok. I have create new reiser filesystem on /dev/hda4, with mkfs.reiserfs but I cannot mount that device . [root@yusril

Re: [reiserfs-list] Some obscure messages with postfix (20010228pl03-5) and probably reiser-fs(3.6.25)

Hi Jörg Spilker wrote: Hello, here a part of my syslog: Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cleanup[2193]: 1F1101536: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin kernel: vs-9020: reiserfs_readdir

Re: [reiserfs-list] Can't write ReiserFS partition!

Hi Michael Forstner wrote: Michael Forstner writes: Hi all, if I create a reiserFS partition (doesn't matter if on HDD or ZIP or something other), I can mount it as user but not write ! I have tried several settings in /etc/fstab but nothing works!! i.e.

Re: [reiserfs-list] performance comparision found in newsgroup

Hi Xuan Baldauf wrote: Is there already a smart readahead that does readahead on the logical and not physical layer? E.g. if there a file which is fragmented, readahead should not read beyond a fragment, but it should read the next fragment ahead. Yes, generic_fileread never reads blocks

Re: [reiserfs-list] root fs check on bootup.

Hi Jan Johansson wrote: On a RH7.1 system, when booting and it checks root fs it appears to hang, but if you press enter it shows something like Do you wish to run this program [N/Yes] do note the need to type Yes. How do i disable that so it automatically checks? I looked trough the list

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: resize_rfs.pl [forwarded message from LarsO. Grobe]

Hi Chris Mason wrote: Hi guys, Is there a schedule/map for things that need to happen before 3.x.0k is no longer considered a pre release? There's not much point in calling 3.x.0j the most recent on the ftp site, we've been pointing users away from it for months. 3.x.0k is not

Re: [reiserfs-list] undelete files ...

Hi Eoin Verling wrote: Hi, That fatal question ... I've deleted something on a reiserFS partition, and I'm trying to recover it. The details, SuSE 7.1, 2.4.6 kernel (reiserFS that comes with distro suse 7.1) I have a large partition with the deleted file, I brought the machine to

Re: [reiserfs-list] Does ReiserFS guarantee data block ordering?

W. Wilson Ho wrote: Andreas Dilger wrote: Lastly, if a (single) user process creates files f1, f2, f3, ... in that order, does the file system guarantee the order of creation? That is, is it possible that after a journal playback, that f2 is gone but f1 and f3 exist?

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS at /

Hi Hauser Marcel wrote: Hi All hope this is not in any faq I haven't read !!. :) Question/Problem: I've currently changed my root partition to reiserfs. At the first boot i get the following error message: cramfs: wrong magic FAT: bogus logical sector size 0 UMSDOS: msdos_read_super

Re: [reiserfs-list] mmap writes 0's to file

Hi W. Wilson Ho wrote: I now believe it is a reiserfs/kernel bug. I've managed to reproduce the bug in the following cases: Ok, it appeared to be a known issue. When getting a problem do you have in your logs something like: vs-: reiserfs_get_block: XXX YYY ZZZ UNKNOWN should not

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS at /

, it does not look like a reiserfs bug. Thanks, vs Cheers Marcel -Original Message- From: vs [mailto:vs]On Behalf Of Vladimir V. Saveliev Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:52 To: Hauser Marcel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS at / Hi Hauser Marcel

Re: [reiserfs-list] File size limit exceeded

Hi Jeff Wilde wrote: I ran into a problem upgrading to the kernel 2.4.9 in that I got file size limit exceeded on the following: -rw-rw1 root root 53812 Aug 30 11:23 radacct.MYD -rw-rw1 root root 396383232 Aug 30 11:23 radacct.MYI It resulted in a core

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2GB files don't work for me

David Lloyd wrote: Hi there! Does the problem lie with tar/dd/etc? You could try: #! /usr/bin/perl my $count; while ($count++ [a number of bytes]) { `echo 1 some_file.test` } That could eliminate the dd, tar thing. Yes, but dd should also work, even if one can avoid

Re: [reiserfs-list] File Corruption and Network Disconnects?

Hi Tony Willoughby wrote: I've got a system with corrupted files. I can't figure out who the culprit is, DRBD or reiserFS. Here's my configuration: - Two nodes running Red Hat 6.1 - DRBD Version: 58. Running over eth1 (10/100 ethernet). - ReiserFS version 3.5.24 - Heartbeat 0.4.9.

Re: [reiserfs-list] Mount options

Hi Rosaire AMORE wrote: Hi I had a /etc/fstab (Linux Mandrake 7.2 - kernel 2.2.17) that contained the following lines : /dev/hda3 / reiserfs notail 1 1 /dev/hdb6 /ext reiserfs rw,suid,dev,exec,auto,user,async 1 2 Nothing to say about the first one. Actually, there is something: root

Re: [reiserfs-list] deleted file, node known

Hi Randall Craig wrote: Hello all, I have a slow modem connection to the internet. Today I was downloading a large iso file, which I accidently deleted during the ftp process. The ftp client continued to write until completion to the files node on reiserfs with SuSE 7.2. Any

Re: [reiserfs-list] Just ran into this problem...

Hi Herman Knief wrote: and I see from some other mail archives, that this is not the first time someone has hit this. I am running SuSE 7.2, Kernel 2.4.7 (from SuSE) w/ ReiserFS as an NFS server. Weren't there anything from reiserfs just before vs-3050 started? Sep 2 09:01:35 nfs001

Re: [reiserfs-list] OOPS removing files on 2.4.8-ac11

Hi Jimmie Mayfield wrote: Hi. I've spent most of the day creating and deleting rather large files (20MB on average) on a 2.4.8-ac11 system. A few minutes ago I got a NULL pointer OOPS while trying to delete 8 of these files. Here is the OOPS listing: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

Re: [reiserfs-list] quota utilities 1.7 with kernel 2.4.4 and reiserfs 3.6.25 (was large quotas)

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, some days ago I posted a question concerning quotas 4GB on reiserfs. I found that almost everyone uses the newer releases of the quota utilities (those from sourceforge), while I still have an old 1.70 (patched for reiserfs) doing its work here.

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS and NFS

Hi Benjamin Albrecht wrote: hi, i have a Compaq Server and Workstations which are using the storage and some other services. Server: Compaq Prolaint 4x700MHz 1.5GB RAM 5x9GB SCSI SmartArray Raid Controller 9x36GB SCSI SmartArray Raid Controller Debian Linux (woody) Kernel 2.4.9

Re: [reiserfs-list] Data corruption on 2.4.8 Production system

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I've just recently upgraded from 2.4.1 with ReiserFS utils a to 2.4.8 ReiserFS utils j. Things went well, although I haven't been able to convert my filesystems from 3.5. to the new 3.6 yet. Anyhow, I'm seeing data corruption and my box has

Re: [reiserfs-list] strange files/file entrys

Hi Maik Holtkamp wrote: Hello, I have following machine: ---config--- SuSE 7.1 (kernel 2.4.6) Promise PDC20265 on A7V hda: Model=Maxtor 34098H4, FwRev=YAH814Y0, SerialNo=L41YXCCC hdb: Model=IBM-DTLA-307030, FwRev=TX4OA60A, SerialNo=YKEYKMJ4510 ReiserFS version 3.5.29 /dev/hda11

Re: [reiserfs-list] reiserfs problems 2.4.9ac10

Hi Jeff Soule wrote: OK this seems to have done the trick. I sucessfuly copied a file 2246934528bytes long. It did appear to take longer then I expected to copy the file. This is subjective since I did not time it and compaire to previous file copies of the same length... Was this just

Re: [reiserfs-list] reiserfschk 3.x.0k-pre9 weirdness

Hi Ronald Moesbergen wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing some weirdness when checking filesystems. When I check my 3.6.25 reiserfs filesystem with reiserfschk3.x.0j, I get no errors, but when i use reiserfschk3.x.0k-pre9, I get the following: Yes, this is a bug in reiserfsck from 3.x.0k-pre9.

Re: [reiserfs-list] Lost disk space (3.5.32)

Hi Philip R. Auld wrote: Hi all, Unix fs semantics allow for a file to be unlinked while it is still open. Given a system crash it is then possible for a file to exist, consuming space, but not to be pointed to by any directory. On ext2 after the crash we would run fsck and the

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi... I had an Oops under kernel 2.4.9, I believe it is from reiserfs. I was doing ./configure under kdelibs-2.1.1 trying to make and install it when this occured. the kdelibs directory is located in a reiserfs partition. When the oops happens, I can't

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:41:03 +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it does oops, and in the same place, everytime. where is the dump? Do you see something

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot up halts

Hi James Troup wrote: I installed reiserfs on all my partitions except /boot When it boots it comes to Reiserfs checking / and just sits there with will put log info to stderr forever until you hit ENTER key. Anyone seen this? Probably, reiserfsck awaits for confirmation from you. It is

Re: [reiserfs-list] corrupted reiserfs

Hi Jonas Jensen (by way of Jonas Jensen ) (by way of Jonas Jensen ) wrote: One of my reiserfs disks became corrupted last week, and it's still causing me problems. I'll try to describe it in full detail, hoping that this problem can be fixed for good. The disk in question is a Linux

Re: [reiserfs-list] [BUG] opps in 2.4.11-pre2 + prempt patch

Hi Ed Tomlinson wrote: Hi, Does this point at anything? This happened running dbench with 2.4.11-pre2 working on a reiserfs on an LVM (1.01-rc2) volume. The prempt patch is also applied. Oct 3 17:41:56 oscar kernel: printing eip: Oct 3 17:41:56 oscar kernel: d680a49c Oct 3

Re: [reiserfs-list] Disk Usage

Hi Ok, I think I understand now: you concern about whether it is reliable to have reiserfs filesystem filled up to 100%? That should not cause any problems like file corruptions (but -ENOSPC, of course). But, it is known that it is not a good idea to allow filesystem to be that full all the

Re: [reiserfs-list] permission denied errors

Hi A problem like this could be caused by a shared objectids. What happened there is that two files got the same objectid. They shouldn't have, right? Yes. You can try to find such files, make their new copies them, remove originals, and rename copies to originals. That doesn't help me

Re: [reiserfs-list] bad .viminfo on reiserfs disk after a dirty reboot

Hi Liu Tao wrote: I am using 2.4.12 and all my partions are reiserfs. Atfer a dirty reboot caused by an accident when i was using vim, a bad .viminfo appears in my home directory. Is that fs's fault? It depends from what did happen with that file right before crash. If vim wrote into that

Re: [reiserfs-list] Hash functions?

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know the difference between the r5, tea and rupasov hash Well, there is some well hidden documentation about it. If you will get ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.2/linux-2.2.18-reiserfs-3.5.30-patch.gz and unpack it with zcat

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Recover Deleted Data.

Hi Pierre Etchemaite wrote: Le 18-Oct-2001, Greg Ward écrivait : just performance wise i think an unlink to a new directory everytime a file is deleted will slow the fs down I would have thought intra-filesystem moves were pretty fast, but again I know nothing about FS internals.

Re: [reiserfs-list] permission denied errors

Hi Harald Barth wrote: I do not think so. The problem probably appeared not recently, but some time ago. But, if you found a reliable way (either with this arlad or with something else) to get files sharing one objectid that would help us to find this bug. It took only 6 hours (under

Re: [reiserfs-list] hardlinks - knfsd - reiserfs bug

Hi Gunnar Raetsch wrote: Hi all, I've got problems with hard links when using the kernel-nfsd and reiserfs. The nfs server gives e.g. the following error messages Oct 25 08:59:09 hebb kernel: nfsd Security: sbin/init bad export. Oct 25 08:59:10 hebb kernel: nfsd Security: bin/bash bad

Re: [reiserfs-list] mkreiserfs and hash functions

Hi Benjamin Scott wrote: Hello again, As I mentioned in my message entitled New to ReiserFS..., I have some questions regarding the mkreiserfs utility and the choice of hash function. I have Linux kernel 2.2.19, reiserfs 3.5.34, and reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j. I am looking at the manual page

Re: [reiserfs-list] reiserfsck placing heavy load on X

Heikki Hannikainen wrote: Hi, This is slightly cosmetic, but easy to fix... blocks on device 10241432 2171432 blocks marked used in on disk bitmap Pass 0 - 0% left 2171431, ...20%...40%... left

Re: [reiserfs-list] Problems with reiserfs 3.5.52 and kernel 2.2.19 on a RH6.2

Hi Marco Bizzarri wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. I'm using reiserfs 3.5.32, with kernel 2.2.19, quota-1.70 on a RH 6.2 system. We have a problem here when we tryied to activate user and group quotas. Do you mean quotaon? The problem is that tasks

Re: [reiserfs-list] Problems with reiserfs 3.5.52 and kernel 2.2.19 on a RH6.2

Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: The latest reiserfs for 2.2 is 3.5.34. Although, iirc, the difference between then are rather cosmetic. I just looked for differences between 3.5.32 and 3.5.34. The last one contains few fixes - including fixes in quota support. So, you should probably upgrade

Re: [reiserfs-list] [BUG?][TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre4

Hi Ed Tomlinson wrote: No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw. How do you provide that at that time there are transactions to be replied? snapshot is read-only device so it will not be mounted if there are transactions to be replied. I have been using this method the chech

Re: [reiserfs-list] [BUG?][TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre4

Nikita Danilov wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev writes: Hi Ed Tomlinson wrote: No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw. How do you provide that at that time there are transactions to be replied? You meant, there is *no* transactions to be replied, right? Yes

Re: [reiserfs-list] [BUG?][TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre4

Chris Mason wrote: On Friday, November 16, 2001 07:02:37 PM +0300 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ed Tomlinson wrote: No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw. How do you provide that at that time there are transactions to be replied? snapshot

[reiserfs-list] Re: DMA timeout

Hi Leandro Lucarella wrote: Hi! Me again... and again with DMA time-out... this time it looks like reiserfs was not afected but it made a few kernel panics... It looks like a kernel 2.4.14 problem the time-out stuff, so I'm going back to my 2.4.10, but reiserfs doesn't have to die because

Re: [reiserfs-list] Problem with find

Hi Philippe Gramoullé wrote: Hi, This may be a little off topic but as it can be a ReiserFS issue i prefer to ask. We have a 600Go RAID5 NFS server (v2.4+ 3.6 fs) that exports one directory to lots of different machines(99% linux clients, few suns, few BSDs) That directory holds dozens

Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

Hi Lars O. Grobe wrote: Hi reiserfs-people! A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the integration of reiserfs in recent

Re: [reiserfs-list] Success with reiserfsck

Hi Vulture wrote: Hello, yesterday I switched on my machine at home and found that my home directory was not mounted, so I closed down X and logged on as root to an ascii console. Trying to hand mount the file system gave an error message, so I typed reiserfsck, which confirmed the file

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.10 vs 2.2.x kernels and knfsd

Hi Dan wrote: I just joined this list so bare with me. What i am trying to figure out is if there are significant improvements in 2.4.10 vs 2.2.x kernels that would make it a good idea to move to this kernel. As well i only see knfsd patches for up to 2.4.5 on your site. Does this mean it

[reiserfs-list] Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: elevator algorithm in disk controller bad?

Hi W. Wilson Ho wrote: Hi Lena, We finally got a programmable power supply and now the experiment can be carried out more precisely. We cycle the power to the machine every 8 minutes. Every time the machine boots up, it runs a program that repeatedly generates lots of empty

Re: ReiserFS on Linux 2.6.7 kernel

Hello Ashish wrote: Hi, Thanks for the information. I still am not entirely clear about the versioning and have a couple of questions. 1. As you said, reiserfs is included in the 2.6.7 kernel. Does that mean that the reiserfs bundled with this kernel has all the latest updates and patches ? Is

Re: Reiser4

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have the latest version of the module_init__tools and modutils? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/ Jenn I rally want to test reiser4 - but i have this problem: modprobe reiser4: FATAL: Error inserting

Re: --rebuild-tree

Hello Cami wrote: Hi All, Last night i done monthly maintence on all of my mailhosts and after doing a reiserfsck, it looks like i'll have to rebuild the tree on one of my mail clusters (the other 8 clusters were fine).. [mailhost01][/root]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use%

Re: Reiser4 / Reiserfs bonnie++ performance comparison

Hans Reiser wrote: Philippe Gramoulle' wrote: Hello, Below are results from bonnie++ done on reiser4 and reiserfs. Each result is an average of 5 runs. For Reiser4 i used default mkfs options and -o formatting=extents For Reisefs i used default mount options and -o notails Assuming that default

REISER4 snapshot

Hello Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot (http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04). It is against 2.6.8-rc2-mm2. It is mostly bug fixes. Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04/READ.ME for install instructions

Re: Compile probs with yesterday's auto-snapshot

Hello Adrian Ulrich wrote: 1. Only i386 and UML on i386 are supported. ddabbs: Big endian appears to be supported. I don't think so. Mounting a reiser4 partiton on ppc-linux doesn't work (mount segfaults + kernel Oops) I created the FS on x86, so it's not the fault of mkfs.reiser4 (I didn't even

Re: fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hello Markus Törnqvist wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:16:12PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: So, the problen cannot be fully solved. However, you can re-create all second level sub-directories and assign another fibration plugins to them. I've never gotten a real reply this question... Will

Re: fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hello Markus Törnqvist wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:43:33PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: I think only empty directory can be refibrated. Are you thinking about implementing it/is it a matter of time and money? Reiser4 provides plugin mechanism. Everyone is encouraged to write plugins

Re: fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hello Markus Törnqvist wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:00:04PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: simply changes id of fibration plugin associated with foo. Doing this on non-empty foo would result in corruption and hence is disabled. Vladimir, as far as I can tell, meant that if one writes And on a

REISER4 snapshot

Hello Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot (http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04). It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1. Most of changes address warnings Andrew Morton made about patches for kernel reiser4 depends on. Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04/READ.ME for install

Re: REISER4 snapshot

Hello Domenico Andreoli wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:23:45PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello hi Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot (http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04). It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1. user-space tools are thos of 2004.08.09-internal.testing

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: reformat code with Lindent

Hello Jeff Mahoney wrote: Hey all - Just out of curiousity, does anyone outside of Chris and I have outstanding patches against ReiserFS? I have no idea how the attached patch managed to not get included. I ask because the tree has been relatively stable for some time and I wonder if it

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: reformat code with Lindent

Hello Jeff Mahoney wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello Jeff Mahoney wrote: Hey all - Just out of curiousity, does anyone outside of Chris and I have outstanding patches against ReiserFS? I have no idea how the attached patch managed to not get included. Interesting. I guess

Re: newly created 8.5TB reiserfs fails fsck on amd64 and causes OOPS

Hello Jeff Mahoney wrote: Vitaly Fertman wrote: Hello, On Tuesday 19 July 2005 15:47, Paul Slootman wrote: This is on a dual-CPU opteron system, with 2 x 3ware 9500 12-channel SATA controllers for a total of 8.5TB; I've configured a RAID5 over each 3ware controller, and use linux md RAID0

Re: reiser4 problem with pam_mktemp

Hello sergey ivanov wrote: I have a problem with reiser4. Recently I have installed Altlinux Compact-rc2 on reiserfs (v3.6), patched kernel 2.6.12 with patch 2.6.12-mm2, created new reiser4 partition hda6 and copied by #cp -ax / /mnt/hda6 there. Fixed /etc/fstab and /boot/grub for new partition

Re: reiser4progs fedora core 4 GCC 4.0.1 error HELP

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reiser4progs fedora core 4 GCC 4.0.1 error HELP please try whether this patch helps [EMAIL PROTECTED] reiser4progs-1.0.4-1]# make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/avl/tmp/reiser4progs-1.0.4-1' Making all in libaux make[2]: Entering

Re: Reiser4progs-1.0.4-1 issues with gcc-4.0.1

Hello Stef van der Made wrote: Dear Sir / Madam, I'm having an issue when compiling reiser4progs-1.0.4-1 using gcc-4.0.1. The compiler spits out the following error but I'm afraid that I'm not famaliar with C code or compilers. I hope you can fix this issue. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

Re: reiser4 problem with pam_mktemp

) as a result of an setting/getting attributes call, as it tmpfs does. But reiser4 returns 'ENOSYS' (Function not implemented). Will you accept patch changing this code to 'ENOTTY'? yes Sergey Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello sergey ivanov wrote: I have a problem with reiser4

Re: reiser4 on 2.6.13-rc6-realtime-preempt

Hello gimpel wrote: Hello! I'm trying to compile a recent 2.6.13-rc6 with realtime-preempt-2.6.13- rc4-RT-V0.7.53-02 and want to add reiser4. 2.6.12-rt hardlocked very often here. Which patches did you use? I managed to fix up the DEFINE_SPINLOCK and compat_semaphore wait; changes by

Re: BUG: reiserfs+acl+quota deadlock

Hello Jan Kara wrote: Tried the attached patch but it changed nothing, I trying to create a new file as a user whose quota grace time has ran out will still cause everything accessing the users homedir (the one with the quota) to hang in D state. Also note that the bug I reported only exists

Re: BUG: reiserfs+acl+quota deadlock

Hello Jeff Mahoney wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello Jan Kara wrote: Tried the attached patch but it changed nothing, I trying to create a new file as a user whose quota grace time has ran out will still cause everything accessing the users homedir (the one with the quota

Re: warnings

Hello Danny wrote: I was compiling the very big open office and I ran out of disk space when I ran across this warnings. You should ignore these warnings if you do not notice other problems. You may want to free some disk space, though. I was told it looks like a problem with disk space

Re: reiser4 on 2.6.13-rc6-realtime-preempt

Hello David Masover wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello reiser4 depends on several core kernel patches. I think you did not apply them. What kind of symptoms would not applying them cause? I assumed that Gimpel did not apply core patches because he had compiling error: fs

Re: reiser4progs 1.0.5 configure script and libaal 1.0.5

Hello Vanuxem Grégory wrote: Hi, The lastest reiser4progs (1.0.5) can't find libaal in configure script. More precisely it doesn't find libaal because of version problem Any idea ? Have you installed ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/libaal-1.0.5.tar.gz? Cheers, Greg

Re: bad blocks on disk. Which files are damaged?

Hello Fionn Behrens wrote: Hello all... I have a harddisk here which developed bad blocks. It is quite large and only a few blocks seem to be affected. I ran several scans wirh the badblocks tool and got a map of defective blocks out of this. Now I'd really like to find out which files on the

Re: where is the journal kept?

Hello Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, I have been reading about journalling filesystems but still don't get where exactly the journal is kept phyically on the harddisk. Can anyone help me with basics of this? Each journaling filesystem keeps its journal by its own way. In reiserfs by default

Re: where is the journal kept?

Hello Payal Rathod wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:25:37PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Each journaling filesystem keeps its journal by its own way. In reiserfs by default journal is kept in statically pre-allocated on mkfs time 8192 blocks (4096 bytes each) starting from 18-th block

Re: where is the journal kept?

/debugfs.reiser4 [ options ] FILE Print options: -j, --print-journal prints journal. yes, this prints reiser4 wandering logs. On Monday 15 August 2005 07:58 am, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello Payal Rathod wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:25:37PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote

Re: where is the journal kept?

Hello Shawn Rutledge wrote: On 8/15/05, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pat Double wrote: ... reiser4 has no filesystem area dedicated for journal. Instead it allocats log(journal) records dynamically. it is transactional. If that's the case, why this option

Re: reiser4 sending process to D state

Hello Mohammad A. Rahman wrote: Hello, I am having an issue with reiser4. I am wondering if it is a known issue for reiser4 or I have missed something along the path. #cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 5) Downloaded 2.6.12 vanila kernel, applied

Re: reiser4 sending process to D state

Hello Hans Reiser wrote: Nate also reported this, yes? Yes, but with different test. I tried both and they worked fine here. WARNING: Flush failed: -12 reiser4[pdflush(99)]: writeout (fs/reiser4/vfs_ops.c:586)[nikita-31001]: code: -12 at fs/reiser4/wander.c:1268 WARNING: Flush failed:

Re: reiser4 sending process to D state

Hello Mohammad A. Rahman wrote: Hello, Please see more details below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi Attached devices: Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: MAXTOR Model: ATLAS10K5_73SCA Rev: JNZM Type: Direct-AccessANSI SCSI

Re: REISERFS_MAX_NAME and ENAMETOOLONG

Hello Xuân Baldauf wrote: Hello, when downloading something from java.sun.com (e.g. http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=22PartDetailId=jdk-1.5.0-doc-oth-JPRSiteId=JSCTransactionId=noreg ), very long URLs are encountered. When trying to download using wget, wget tries to

Re: Can one stop reiserfsck --rebuild-tree

Hello Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote: Hi, Checking reiserfs manpages...i dont see a mention of the effects of killing --rebuild-tree process once in progress. Can this be suspended (ctrl ^Z)? I just tried. Nothing wrong happened. fg made it to continue. _thanks Richard

Re: Odd llseek semantics on directories

Hello Charles P. Wright wrote: Hello, I've noticed that Reiser4's behavior deviates from other file systems when seeking with directories. After reading a directory, if you run vfs_lseek(dir, 0, SEEK_CUR), then -ENOENT is returned. This means that you can't pass the identifier back to

Re: Two possible bugs in V3 ReiserFS and 2.4.31 kernel??

Hello Cris Rhea wrote: Background: Dell 6600 (4 processor, 8GB memory) with RHAS3 loaded. Email product vendor suggests using ReiserFS V3 on mail spool directory for speed (many files in one directory). Since RedHat does not support/include ReiserFS in their kernels, download and build

Re: Odd llseek semantics on directories

, 2147483647, SEEK_SET) = 2147483647 Charles On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 20:19 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello Charles P. Wright wrote: Hello, I've noticed that Reiser4's behavior deviates from other file systems when seeking with directories. After reading a directory, if you run

Re: fsync performance of reiser 4

Hello Sandeep Tyagi wrote: Hi - Does anybody any idea whether reiserfs people are working on improvement of fsync performance of Reiser 4. do you have any measurements already? We have an application in which we use lot of fsyncs so we are planning to Reiser 4 if it gives good performance

Re: reiser fs slow on mksf and mount

Hello Ming Zhang wrote: Hi, folks I am not sure if this is normal or not. I try to createuse a reiserfs on a 8 disk raid0. Then I found that mkfs need ~90 sec and mount need ~70 seconds. Is there anything wrong on my side? Your device is too big. Thanks! Ming Detailed

Re: reiser fs slow on mksf and mount

Hello Ming Zhang wrote: forget to mention that original mount is immediately after mkfs. so no files in fs at all. now i create 1048576 4KB files then umount and remount [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time mount /dev/md0 t real1m10.971s user0m0.001s sys 0m0.188s almost

  1   2   3   4   >