mental load, there's been a couple of times in the past where I was pondering
between "should I spend time on a release" and "should I spend time on that
cleanup/feature". Less options fighting for my attention.
> If no one disagrees I'll add it to the release-tools/module
er even contains a couple of things the latest release doesn't
have... I just couldn't get around to make a proper release.
Cheers.
--
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
e
me as an odd choice.
Overall apidox would likely need a big pass of cleanups as well.
I think that's it from me.
Regards.
--
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
uses buggy releases?
Well, I'd first ask, which parts of frameworks are buggy in 5.67? Which are
the affected frameworks? If we're talking about a couple in a set of 80, I'd
first ask what those have in common that the others don't?
I'd look at all that before blaming and overhauling the release mod
.
> (the other reason being all the changes I made)
Cheers.
--
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
s4support.
>
> Has anyone attempted to port away from it?
Not yet, but definitely something I want to tackle soon-ish.
Regards.
--
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 00:30:23 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Random thought, would KDAB be unhapppy because we're releasing something
> called kdav ?
Can't see a reason why either. As David pointed out it's a different name, and
also it's different in nature (company vs library).
Hello,
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 10:08:06 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:47:06 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Is it me or this whole thing is making most people life harder to please
one person? I'm getting this feeling based on the past discussions on
k-f-d and the replies here
Hello,
On Monday 08 June 2015 01:28:04 David Faure wrote:
The thread Versioning of Frameworks on kde-frameworks-devel has led to the
idea that some future frameworks (coming from the kdepim world) would not
be part of every Frameworks release, and would have their own versioning
scheme. This
On Thursday 30 October 2014 08:14:03 laurent Montel wrote:
Le Thursday 30 October 2014 01:19:27 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
Hi guys, so Laurent said that for KDE Applications 14.12 we should ship
4.x based versions of kdepim*
Which brings me to the question, when releasing KDE
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 09:16:23 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 23:07:21 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:58:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 11:30:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:20:35 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Meanwhile, I
Hello,
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 16:38:54 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
keeping in mind that this thread is not about Plasma or any of the KDE
applications, the expectations and goals of the *Frameworks* developers
_and_ users (app devs) are probably unique in this case.
the Frameworks team would
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 11:28:45 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:17:15 Kevin Ottens wrote:
The aim is the following in my books:
Thanks :)
Obviously the difficult point as certainty goes is the last one, as it is
highly dependent on the amount of contributions which
On Monday 19 May 2014 22:28:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Speaking as a packager for a distro that's in group #2, I don't see this as
any change from your initial proposal.
That's correct...
You're proposal moves us into group #1
... which is what I stated I think.
Chosen extracts:
Going
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:20:35 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Meanwhile, I notice that the release date of May 4th for B2 wasn't attained,
or did it just go without a announcement and dot story?
It was published, but indeed no announcement and dot story.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens,
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:19:59 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On May 20, 2014 4:19:26 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
So after 5.0, 5.0.1 is released with minor features and bugfixes (but
no mandatory changes in dependencies at all); which continues until
January, when 5.1 comes out,
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:55:26 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm open to discussing change, but so far the change is You're on your own,
get over it. Not a lot to discuss in that.
It's not at all the way it's been thought, it is unfortunate if it is
perceived that way. Looks like I can't frame and
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 08:00:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 08:04:59 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 22:28:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Speaking as a packager for a distro that's in group #2, I don't see this
as
any change from your initial proposal
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 08:52:39 Scott Kitterman wrote:
That's how it comes across to me. There was a lot of negative feedback the
first time and the reaction to that comes across to me as a patronizing
repetition of the initial proposal wrapped up in IMO unfounded assurances
that it would be
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:58:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 11:30:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:20:35 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Meanwhile, I notice that the release date of May 4th for B2 wasn't
attained, or did it just go without a announcement and dot
Hello all,
First of all, my apologies for the long time taken for me to send an email.
So, this release cycle proposal generated more debate among our dear packagers
than we anticipated. I tried to keep up with the thread, but too be honest
it's far too long at that point and also the
Hello,
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 14:33:12 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
* Everything is developed in master, so each release will contain a few
new features and bugfixes;
Of course, going with this type of cycle comes with some
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 15:18:55 Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 14:33:12 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
* Everything is developed in master
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 19:33:45 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Shouldn't ecm be basically *not* be packaged with frameworks? I.e. do you
plan to keep releasing ecm every time you release frameworks? I understood
it was a separate project and thus the separate versioning.
That's the goal, but ATM
On Sunday 05 January 2014 12:40:05 David Faure wrote:
And now the bad news: we'd like to release on January 7.
But this is just a technical preview of something technical (= not usable by
end users), I'm not sure if we *need* to have binary packages by that date.
Indeed it's not critical IMO.
On Monday 23 December 2013 09:18:45 David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 22 December 2013 15:07:55 Allen Winter wrote:
How about if we group all the current frameworks projects into a kdelibs
category?
Eventually we'd have a category for plasma, kdepim, etc.
the git urls wouldn't change,
On Sunday 22 December 2013 11:17:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Saturday 21 December 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
2013/12/21 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org:
On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Now, the hard part, how's versioning going to go now and in the future
Hello,
On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
How should we proceed about this?
Easy pasrt: tarball + repo tag.
Then you need to find a place to set it up in the download server.
I think we should put the stable ones in
http://download.kde.org/stable/ and the
Hello,
On Saturday 30 June 2012 13:15:36 Andrew von Stuermer wrote:
Tried er...@kde.org, but that message bounced.
Well, turns out I received all your messages at the same time. I've three
requests from you in my inbox. Something weird happened with our mail server
apparently. Oh well, can
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 17:27:45 Dirk Mueller wrote:
can we ping Bensi ? I don't know his contact address, did we try other
means to reach him?
Just did that, by email and IM. He's more or less on the road this week. He'll
take a look when he has a minute though.
Apparently he didn't get any
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 23:03:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9?
Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around
Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months
cycle). Obviously this means that either:
a)
Hello,
On Friday 06 January 2012 13:29:42 David Faure wrote:
can you make sure this commit goes into kdelibs-4.8.0 ?
Given the current RC status, I'm not sure if all changes to kdelibs KDE/4.8
will be taken, or none, or only selected ones...
I'd just like to point out that it is a very
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 10:31:45 Tom Albers wrote:
- Original Message -
Well, having this duplicated code everywhere for even more months
(look at
lxr.kde.org to see what I mean) is enough to make me want this bugger
ASAP.
It's not months, in a month or so trunk is open
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 12:37:12 John Layt wrote:
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 10:18:39 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Sorry if the wording turned out unfortunate it wasn't my intent there. It
was more about a reality check:
a) I can't devote much time to it on a regular basis (it's rather low
On Saturday 27 November 2010 19:19:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dissabte, 27 de novembre de 2010, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Thursday 4 November 2010 10:08:45 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 4 November 2010 09:52:41 John Layt wrote:
I'd like to see all the date/time widgets in KDE
On Saturday 27 November 2010 19:21:54 John Layt wrote:
On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:30:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
OK, turns out I could sit with Stephane Mankowski today during the KDE
Hacking Session in Toulouse and we made KDateEdit ready for inclusion in
kdelibs. Timing wise it's rather
On Thursday 4 November 2010 10:08:45 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 4 November 2010 09:52:41 John Layt wrote:
I'd like to see all the date/time widgets in KDE reviewed and amalgamated
as much as possible in kdelibs, or at least made consistent in behaviour
and appearance. I just didn't
On Friday 19 December 2008 20:21:59 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hmm, actually isn't this more something for workspace? As far as I
understood the purpose of this is to replace a GTK/Gnome-equivalent if
running a KDE desktop. Thats exactly what workspace is for.
Rex is right, it's a runtime
On Monday 17 November 2008 13:24:13 Dirk Mueller wrote:
I think it should be moved to kdereview and we should target the decision
about inclusion with Beta2.
Definitely my preferred way of handling it. So +1 from me.
Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
Ni le maître sans
Le lundi 5 mai 2008, Allen Winter a écrit :
I guess kdereview should be closed for now?
That'd be unfortunate, I'm almost done with Goya...
Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance.
Le lundi 5 mai 2008, Kevin Ottens a écrit :
Actually, it'll be ready to move in kdereview tomorrow[*]. Should I give up
on the idea and relax? :-)
[...]
[*] Only one class to rename, and running krazy in paranoid mode. Otherwise
it has apidox and an example application already. Also it got
Le Thursday 27 March 2008, Allen Winter a écrit :
I think the Release Team should discuss this and provide a policy
statement.
Do we allow Python/Ruby/C#/Perl etc. apps in the KDE main modules?
If so, which ones and why?
Oh, and this is also needed for Jonathan's
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008, Sebastian Kuegler a écrit :
The communication strategy would be rather simple:
- We're moving *back* to time-based releases
Which would be perfect if we really applied such a release cycle before...
That's not the case. We were making an plan based on what would make
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2008, Sebastian Kuegler a écrit :
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 00:09:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
- Executive summary
In this mail I'll be advocating the way I think we should make our
release planning from now on. Some parts will look similar to what we
were
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
Just in case you care: openSUSE would have a problem with September
Doesn't it have a problem with July also?
Well, at least 11.0 is announced for June 19, but maybe it's not set in stone.
Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens,
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2008, Kevin Ottens a écrit :
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2008, Allen Winter a écrit :
I think we should move kwalletmanager from kdeutils into kdebase/apps.
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be available in
our base system.
Comments? Objections?
Yes
Le lundi 7 janvier 2008, Allen Winter a écrit :
6 or 9.
hmm..
how many beta or release candidates do we expect?
when would the feature freeze hit?
if we do 1 beta, and feature freeze at that time.
and then 1 RC.
.. then I think 6months is enough.
If we expect more than 1 beta or RC,
Le lundi 7 janvier 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
Kevin and i talked quite a bit about time boxed schedules like this when he
visited in the summer; well, he talked and i mostly listened ;) so perhaps
Kevin has some input here as well? *nudge*
Aaaah bet she does, I bet she does, say no
Hi all,
- Executive summary
In this mail I'll be advocating the way I think we should make our release
planning from now on. Some parts will look similar to what we were doing,
some won't. I think doing strict time-based release would be a mistake and I
think we should do ourselves a
SVN commit 757402 by ervin:
Reverting commit 757034 which was completely preventing to configure any
global shortcut. This issue will obviously require more investigation...
OK'd by Tom Albers.
We probably want that hotfix in the 4.0.0 tag. Otherwise we're shipping
a desktop where we can't
Le jeudi 27 décembre 2007, Anne-Marie Mahfouf a écrit :
This is a request for including new artwork for 4.0, a new cursor
theme (which cannot break anything)
Actually it's a wrong assumption, especially in the case of cursors which
could trigger bugs in video drivers (already happened to me in
Hello,
The freeze for the platform is here, and thanks to questions from Lubos about
the old mediamanager I noticed that the media ioslave is still in
kdebase/runtime... while I somehow thought I removed it weeks ago.
I'm not even sure it's functional right now, and I'm not planning to fix it
Le lundi 16 juillet 2007, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
Potentially obsolete .pot files:
[...]
2007-07-03 templates/messages/kdebase/kio_home.pot
2007-07-03 templates/messages/kdebase/kio_system.pot
I killed those ioslaves last week. So those files can be removed.
Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin'
53 matches
Mail list logo
