The answer to your first
question is perfectly obvious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005
12:50 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington
adding under God to the Presidential oath
sday, July 20,
2005 12:50 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington
adding "under God" to the Presidential oath
In a message
dated 7/20/2005 11:35:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
It would help
Does grammar have a role to
play in the controversy between Marty and Jim? If so, it seems Marty wins.
"Democratic" is, of course, an adjective; "Democrat" is a noun. If not, why
not?
Bobby
Robert Justin
LipkinProfessor of LawWidener University School of
LawDelaware
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Truth is, I only
pretend to be saluting McCarthy, whose information turned out to be impeccable
even if his personality and ethic did not. My pretense was offered
because, in pointing out the
/2005 8:14 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington adding under God to the Presidential oath
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Truth is, I only pretend to
be saluting McCarthy, whose information turned
]
*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: George Washington adding under God to the Presidential
oath
It comes from
In a message dated 7/20/2005 9:15:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat
Party.
You can, of course,
call the Democratic Party anything you wish. However, the
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington
adding under God to the Presidential oath
In a
message dated 7/20/2005 10:22:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never
associated Democrat Party with McCarthy, although I'm not all that surprised to
learn that he
In a message dated 7/20/2005 11:35:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would help if you would
respect the norms.
Please. An end to this nonsense.
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Some of you may
dislike it. You, in turn, will call me juvenile.
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Republic Party!
Cheers and Blessings to Democrat and Republic listmembers alike, Rick Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/20/2005
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member
of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Republic
Party!
Cheers and Blessings to Democrat and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Some of you
may dislike it.
If I had my voter registration card with me here, I could see just what
it says I am. Since I don't, I'll have to go on memory alone. I'm
pretty sure I'm a registered member of the
What about the Pale Mint folk?
Samuel V wrote:
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member
of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the
Sent: 7/20/2005 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: George Washington adding under God to the Presidential oath
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud
member
of the Republic Party and I am
Scarberry, Mark wrote:
Thus the Democratic Party seems to want special
treatment, claiming the right to have its members known as Democrats rather
than Democratics. :-)
That's 'cause we're special*. *Noddle*
Jean
*For an unspecified value of "special"
Arthur V. Watkins, a Republican, was an honorable man. Consequently, the censure of Joseph McCarthy was not done in error. Had his information been "impeccable," he would not have been censured.
The Party of Joseph McCarthy may, if it chooses, call the Democratic Party "the Democrat Party" in
Volokh, Eugene wrote:
I've heard various people mention that George Washington added
so help me God to the constitutionally prescribed, which is I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my
-
From: Jean Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: George Washington adding under God to the Presidential oath
Volokh, Eugene wrote:
I've heard various people mention that George Washington added
so help me God to the constitutionally prescribed, which
I am slow coming to this thread. I did some research on oaths in
connection with the mysterious disappearance of "so help me God" in testimonial
oaths administered during the Democrat interregnum on the Senate Judiciary
Committee, after Jim Jeffords left the Republican Caucus. With Pat Leahy
Jim: The proper adjective is Democratic, as in Democratic Party. (But
then, you probably already knew that.) Sorry for the lecture, but this is a
hobbyhorse of mine: The lockstep use of Democrat as an adjective is not only
juvenile, and grating on the ears, it's also quite literally
Read the original charter at Harvard. Closely! It is a dead give a way!
I am slow coming to this thread. I did some research on oaths in
connection with the mysterious disappearance of "so help me God" in testimonial
oaths administered during the Democrat interregnum on the Senate Judiciary
In a message dated 7/19/2005 4:35:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim: The proper adjective is "Democratic," as in "Democratic
Party." (But then, you probably already knew that.) Sorry for the
lecture, but this is a hobbyhorse of mine: The lockstep use of
22 matches
Mail list logo
