Looks like the ARRL and RSGB don't communicate very well about band plans.
This is going to be interesting when the band opens up to Europe!
Conditions on 10FM to Japan, etc. are already open this season.
They should check out the 10M FM mailing list on yahoo.
LJ
Original Message:
Amen,
I have had a few 10 meter repeater QSO's just to try it. They were all
incredibly short due to about 12 interfering repeaters all being keyed up at
once!! You would think that a 10 meter repeater op would, at the very
least, set them up to require a CTCSS tone so that they dont
Yea, even in the same band. UHF repeater with a UHF remote base. The repeater is on 442 withtheremote baseon 444. It's linking to another repeater about seventy miles away. We let each repeater ID on it's own. The repeater TX PL tones are COS operated so that the PL tone is only transmitted
I am in the planning process for constructing a 10 meter repeater and it
will have tone on most of the time. There will only be limited times where
the tone will be turned off.
Paul
WB5IDM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December
I have an435 MHz
simplex linkradio on a 440 MHz repeater. I have my controller not
holding PTT for a hang time on the link port and obviously no courtesy tone
either. The other repeater I am linking to is set up the same
way.This makes the link very seamless. You cant even tell that
its
I thought on 10 M. that some are tone access ?
I think Chicago, IL did ??
Mark Holman
Isn't Radio Fun !! ??
- Original Message -
From: Wade Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] ten meter
At 10:25 AM 12/1/04, you wrote:
I want a Mitrek manual #6881039E70 or a copy of one for a Mitrek low
band (42-50 mhz) radio. Need for alignment porposes and schematic as
I want to convert to a 6mm repeater. Contact me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm also in QRZ.
Gene Rodgers
The one on the south side of chicago (29.66)was listed as tone access, but it runs carrier squelch as far as i can tell.. Yup, just kerchunked it with no pl.
Tom
W9SRV
Mark Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought on 10 M. that some are tone access ?I think Chicago, IL did ??Mark
When I put tone on a group complained no tone board.. OK I gave out the
tone temp-off. Oops no touch tone board. Too bad we have 4 less
users.. conersations much better now!
Robin J Staebler
WE1MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RE using CTCSS:
Nobody said repeater owners were smart. The
You left out there family tree goes up but does not branch out in some
cases smile
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:39
AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ten meter
We gave every one a date when we would turn on the PL on the repeater. You
can add a Comspec encoder to any radio for under $30.00. Hey its only 3 wires
and two are power. The third I like to put on the discriminator pot most of the
time. So any Ham should be able to install PL or some one
It is not! It least under Part 90 and 95.
Back in the 70ty's many folks would tell people it was but it is not in the
rules.
- Original Message -
From:
Steve
Kometz
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:38
PM
Subject: Re:
Yes, it's only 3 wires (B+, ground, and audio), but it's
amazing how many extra class licensees can't do that!
Joe M.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Steve Kometz wrote:
Carrier squelch illegal on UHF???
For commercial systems, yes. Part 90 and 95. In the U.S.
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from this group,
Wade Lake wrote:
I worked in the radio biz for years. I was involved in setting up
many a commercial repeater and even though it is good practice to use DCS or
CTCSS, I don't recall the FCC licenses restricting carrier access. That
goes double for the public safety repeaters (police
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RE using CTCSS:
Nobody said repeater owners were smart. The SERA group just rescinded their
new rule of requiring CTCSS/DCS on all new repeater pairs because too many of
the old farts complained. (most probably didn't know how to program a tone in
their
Where in the Part 95 reg's does it state that carrier squelch is not
permitted???
Johnny
Jim B. wrote:
Steve Kometz wrote:
Carrier squelch illegal on UHF???
For commercial systems, yes. Part 90 and 95. In the U.S.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
This is a sad but true statement!
73 Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] was: ten meter repeater setups now CTCSS
Yes, it's only 3 wires (B+,
Unfortunately, many 10M Repeaters get their coordination with the condition
that they be in CTCSS Access. One in Southern California that I know of is
doing this.
Some repeater builders put them up for testing and just never seem to get
around to turning on the decoder. Or they come up with
NO! What part 90 are you looking at.
I spoke with the FCC this morning and it is not in there copy of part 90. I
looked in the PF book I have and it is a few years old not there . Once
again an old myth. Not in the rules.
73 Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think what he was getting at was wanting a USED manual. I see them at
hamfests for $5-10 (got mine for $2 at Dayton). I bought a bunch at Dayton
several years ago, but have sold the extras already. They are around, and
often on ebay, etc. (and this group) for a lot less than Motorola wants for
Tony has a great point!
The issue with sera was a simple one, not so much that
the old farts complained about the new PL
encode/decode requirement.
The issue at hand with sera is simple, coordinators
throughout the U.S. have no authority to dictate
repeater operations other than they conform to
I'm confused on something, and hopefully
someone will guide me in the right direction. I'm not sure which is
needed to complete my Simplex repeater station, minus the controller. I
see all the stuff listed on EBAY from GE and Motorola like transceiver
and repeaters. Which do I need ?
When I contacted Motorola and gave them the model #
T81JAA4900DK they informed me the manual was no longer
available and gave me the number that is posted.
Suggested news groups or Ebay.
Gene
--- Mike WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:25 AM 12/1/04, you wrote:
I want a Mitrek manual
Okay.. Everyone had to suffer through this crap on QRZ.COM and in other
forums.
I could comment on further on this. But...
Can we give this a rest?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:28 AM
edctexas wrote:
A microwave system is great for the handling of a remote receiver
system. Most of the link channels are 4W and do have EM signalling.
Hey since 4-wire EM came up here... I'll ask this question to this
list. I've asked various VoIP lists, but haven't had any positive
Uhhh... coordinators DO have the authority to set the terms for which
they will grant (or deny) a coordination. It's the same as limiting the
ERP, or antenna height. If you say the coordinator has no authority to
require specifications, then what IS a coordination? Answer: It's a set
of operating
When I contacted Motorola and gave them the model #
T81JAA4900DK they informed me the manual was no longer
available and gave me the number that is posted.
Suggested news groups or Ebay.
Gene
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he was getting at was wanting a USED
Uhhh... coordinators DO have the authority to set the terms
for whichthey will grant (or deny) a coordination.That is correct,
they have the "authority" to set any terms that happen to please them, however,
they have no authority, other than denial of "coordination", to prevent anyone
Look at Multi-Tech Systems (www.multitech.com) They have 1, 2, 4 and 8 port
boxes. Supports FXS, FXO and E/M on every port configured in software.
Kim, K5TU
-Original Message-
From: Nate Duehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:32 AM
To:
Which boxes are you talking about Kim? I don't see anything mentioning
EM signalling? Of course it may also be a brain fart on my end. ;)
Kevin K2KMB
-Original Message-
From: Kim Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:38 PM
To:
Thanks to all who posted way to get the job done. Most were good, a
few were rude, but hey. What can you expect. I am building some
Motorola mobile radios to become EchoLink/IRLP link radios and needed
to get a positive going COS so EchoLink IRLP would respond
correctly. I just overlooked
Guess I missed something, thought we were talking Part 97 here.
Evidently I hit a "Jeff Foxworthy" soft spot. Usually a coordination council votes on something as a group and the majority decision is what becomes the rule. Evidently not at SERA.
Tone is good, tone is great, tone should be
Living 1/2 mile from 'RF hell" on top of Lookout Mtn. requires that a repeater must have tone before I can listen to the channel without putting up with constant intermod. We have several untoned repeaters here in the Denver area that can't understand why someone would want tone on the output
Nate,
We have the hardware and software solution you are looking for. See
www.zapatatelephony.com under the remote base link.
Steve
WA6ZFT.
From: Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/12/02 Thu PM 12:31:30 EST
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 4-wire EM + VoIP (was: Re:
I'll agree with Tony ..
An Amateur is considerate towards others,
part of the Radio Amateurs Code I don't flaunt my license
class towards anyone, or that I am persuing advanced interests in
electronics.
I have been in other Chat-BBSes that are purely BS with an
arrogant person
Forwarded from the Tower-pro remailer:
Jamie Piche wrote:
Hi All,
I am selling 8 old Att sites for a client that is going to be
taking them down. They are complete sites with Gensets, batteries,
heliax, antennas. For more details, please see the online pictures
and information at
Hello ...
The 68-81039E70 Manual covers the T81JJA Series (AK Suffix) to
68-81037E65-B Manual
The 68-81045E65 Manual covers the T51/81JJA Series (BK Suffix)
The above information comes from the Motorola Reference List:
For Instruction Manuals and Instruction Sections.
Hope
As Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF, pointed out so well a number of years ago:
5-2 ... is one half of 10-4 ... ;)
Neil - WA6KLA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... snip ...
I've often thought the 100hz tone would be a good idea for use on
some simplex channels were the ex-CBer contingent
Neil McKie wrote:
As Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF, pointed out so well a number of years ago:
5-2 ... is one half of 10-4 ... ;)
Neil - WA6KLA
mercy sakes...
;cD
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
See below ... (please excuse me, Kevin)
mch wrote:
Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
Uhhh... coordinators DO have the authority to set the terms for
which they will grant (or deny) a coordination.
That is correct, they have the authority to set any terms that
There contact info is (Cook Towers, INC):
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
toll free phone number: 877-992-2665
They are open 08:00 through 17:00 eastern time. Monday to through Friday and
closed Saturday and Sunday.
Good luck and 73,
Russ, W3CH
- Original Message -
From: Mike WA6ILQ [EMAIL
42 matches
Mail list logo
