Mark ( and me ) is looking for info in the
TKR-830 not the TKR-850
for amateur band
Juan
- Original Message -
From:
russ
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:30
PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re:
Kenwood TKR-830
What About Hutton ?
Mark Holman AB8RU
Happy Holidays
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Source for custom made cables
TESSCO lost points with me
Has anyone had luck using the Q-202G duplexers in the 145-148 range? What
needs to be done with them for use in the ham band? Just different cables?
What sort of isolation figure is possible? Thanks.
Paul
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
--- Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With the finger printing software out now, yes, by
looking at the display
or printed data, the individual radio can be
identified. I do not mean that
they can tell the difference between a MICOR and a
MASTR. That is easy.
They can
Paul,
I have tuned three Q-202G duplexers in the past six months, and all
wound up with nearly identical performance. The only difference between
a Q-202G duplexer for the 2m band and one for the 150-174 MHz band is
the length of the jumper cables. The factory-made harness for the
commercial
I'm not entirely tongue in cheek when I ask whether you should be in
charge of a repeater or installing one if you have not got the expertise to
cut a bit of coax and fit a plug or socket. And if the spare 20 minutes is
to much for some then that would explain the funny noises I often hear
Can anyone tell me details of crystal specifications for UHF mitrek.
I am getting a T44JJA390DK and would like to replace the crystals for
local frequencies. I would like to get confirmation that the
crystals are 3rd overtone crystals - series resonant - 32pf capacity -
(freq =10.7 / 9 for
Haven't tried them yet.
Neil - WA6KLA
Mark Holman wrote:
What About Hutton ?
Mark Holman AB8RU
Happy Holidays
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:47 PM
Subject: Re:
I think the point was mistaken here. I either have to change the connector
on the receiver so that the cable goes directly to the receiver without
using any connetors to change from one type of plug to another, or find a
special cable with an RCA on one end and a Type N Male on the other. My
just call Tessco and have them make you an RCA to N cable and be done with
it. one cable make and tested the way you need it.
we do it all the time and never any problems.
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday,
I don't know if you are really going to have a big problem with the MASTR
RCA connector. I would make the cable up myself, RCA plugs are not that
hard to put on. I use the MASTR ER41 receiver on my packet digi and have
not had any problems with the receiver connector. If I really wanted to
Yes! and they work well. You need different cable lengths and different
length rods on the tubular caps,or convert to trimmers. 73,Lee
Paul Holm wrote:
Has anyone had luck using the Q-202G duplexers in the 145-148 range? What
needs to be done with them for use in the ham band? Just
You gonna grind your own crystals??? You dont really need all that info
if youre ordering replacements,just supply the radio info to the crystal
house.They may need the numbers of the channel elements on some radios.
You should still get a manual thought,you will need it for the tuning
On Dec 18, 2004, at 9:07, Q wrote:
You gonna grind your own crystals??? You dont really need all that info
if youre ordering replacements,just supply the radio info to the
crystal
house.
Try http://www.westcrystal.com/
Call them, give them the part number of the channel element, the
I'd use the origional GE cable if available. I'm not fond of RCA's but
the factory cables have proved better than anything I ever made. 73,Lee
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I think the point was mistaken here. I either have to change the connector
on the receiver so that the cable goes directly to the
Mathew,
just get the cables from a GE base. It will most likely have an so239 on it
and replace it. I would not worry about using the RCA plug. GE had them on
mastrII's for years. I will look to see if I can scrounge a spare cable.
Kevin King SCSA BSCIS
ARS KC6OVD
GMRS KAG0378
EIEIO 2722
Did you see where he/she is
Juan
- Original Message -
From:
Q
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:07
AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Mitrek
You gonna grind your own crystals??? You dont really need
all that info
I wished it was available. I had several of these cables but tossed them
all out about 5 years ago when I thought I was done playing with radios.
Just go to show keep it, you never know when you will need it.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Daddy, are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Are we there, yet?
Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County DES CD-2
Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified
Exactly my point. How long can this thread go on without adding anything USEFUL
to the original question ?
Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County DES CD-2
Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified ECRVDriver/Operator BC-6
Bullitt County ARES\RACES Coordinator KY4DES
-Original Message-
From:
You remember when GE used RF patch cables that had the RCA plugs
on both ends?
I 'still' have some here ...
Neil - WA6KLA
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I wished it was available. I had several of these cables but
tossed them all out about 5 years ago when I thought I was done
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul,
...snip...
A 100W repeater normally requires 100
dB of isolation for zero desense, and that usually calls for six
cavities. However, I have used a Q-202G duplexer with two added
bandpass cavities on the
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes! and they work well. You need different cable lengths and
different
length rods on the tubular caps,or convert to trimmers. 73,Lee
Hi Lee
I changed my cable lengths (that is a different story...some lengths
had
And WHAT does this contribute to the list??
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer Industrial)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 9:40 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder](was;
Don't know... I just roll my eyes and go to the next message. Or if I see a
whole bunch with the same subject, I just skip 'em all. I've been doing that
a lot recently... grin
Richard, N7TGB
-Original Message-
From: Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer Industrial)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably,the tuning docs are on repeater-builder site under Q series
rtoplus wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes! and they work well. You need different cable lengths and
different
length rods on the tubular caps,or convert to
At 11:07 AM 12/18/04, you wrote:
Bill Pasternak will build you any kind of cable assembly for a price.
Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF, of Newsline fame, has absolutely no
relationship with Pasternack Enterprises, the cable company.
Pasternak Enterprises
It's Pasternack Enterprises - note the ck
With all due respect, if the crystal manufacturer cannot make a crystal for
a Mitrek with just the channel element part number, I'd seriously be looking
for a different supplier.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: krmvsjr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Bill Pasternak will build you any kind of cable assembly for a price.
Pasternak Enterprises
P. O. Box 16759
Irvine, CA 92623
Ph 714-261-1920
No known web presence.
Al, K9SI
Big Snip
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
And I believe they have a $100 minimum order. Kind of steep for a chunk of
coax with an RCA connector attached to it.
You can get the short center pin RCA plugs with Teflon insulation from the
RF Connection. He also sells all sorts of other connectors. Last time I
spoke with him, he said that
Me too, but we live in the U.S.! I suspect living in India
gives one a very different perspective on that. I hope
someone can help Venkat with the xtal info. (Maybe someone
already has... I was only partially following the topic
since I don't have the requested info.)
Paul N1BUG
On
I glanced at the call and thought it was a Canadian one. Ooops. I forget
that world wide web means just that. Too used to thinking there's just North
Americans on the list for some foolish reason.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Paul Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Think I may have it taken care of. I am just going to remove the RCA and
replace it with a Type N connector and that should take care of it.
Appreciate all the support on this one.
Mathew
W9MWQ
At 11:07 AM 12/18/04, you wrote:
Bill Pasternak will build you any kind of cable assembly for a
I may be able to help, but it will take a day or two...
While I make a couple of phone calls, Venkat what
frequencies do you need?
Maybe someone on this group has them in their box of
elements left over from their amateur radio conversions.
Of maybe someone has a leftover set of UHF commercial
One of the reasons I always go to
International Crystal Manufacturing Co, Inc. in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. http://www.icmfg.com 800-HAM-XTAL (800-426-9825)
Hope this helps,
Neil - WA6KLA
Chuck Kelsey wrote:
With all due respect, if the crystal manufacturer cannot make a
Hi Paul,
Paul Holm wrote:
Has anyone had luck using the Q-202G duplexers in the 145-148 range?
Yes, there are 4 repeaters close by my area that use them.
What needs to be done with them for use in the ham band? Just different
cables?
Right, considering they may be fairly far from the
Hi Kevin,
Just a quick question regarding your earlier email - I thought crystal
oscillators were cleaner (as far as noise sidebands are concerned ) than PLL
types.
Is this not the case in the GE Mastr II you mention below, as you indicate
the PLL type of exciter is better? Is this particular
37 matches
Mail list logo
