I had a UHF machine which simply passed user PL with flat enough response to
achieve the same effect. Then, I got complaints from my control ops that
during autopatches, they could hear only the telephone side of the
conversation.
Just can't win!
73,
Paul, AE4KR
_
From:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Icom gives 5 more D-Star repeaters to the WIA
.
Let's see, iCOM gives away repeaters that can only be used with iCOM
radios.
Explaining the continued lack of interest in those specific repeaters..
Personally the conversion process of a junker IS the journey
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:20:27 +
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Icom gives 5 more D-Star
I'd vote to stay with what you are using.
You could decrease performance to hand-helds closer in if you go with a
higher gain antenna, not to mention the added cost of the bigger antenna,
more wind load, more weight, greater flexing (unless there's a top bracket).
You'll see 3 dB increase at
Derek,
Going to the higher gain antenna may cause shadowing in some areas
close in to the repeater site if its up real high. I also like the
DB-408 antennas and am using them on my systems. The fiberglass
antennas are OK also, But if they take a lightning hit they are gone.
I had an ASP copy
hu
to bad for me,we would have need one for our radio club here
:-
http://www.emoticonesgratuites.ca/?icid=EMFRCA120
to bad it does not arrived around here
i would have tried this DSTAR system but for the moment i find the $$$ a little
to much
for an ham radio club that by definition have no money most of the time but
many whishes
gervais ve2ckn
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sat, 24 Nov
Hi all
we have been using here
Sinclair SRL-210 a4 for many years ,they are well built,4 dipoles .
they have been cloned by many telecom compagny as Comprod too
we have tested Fiberglass antenna,after a time the coating of the fibreglass
dissapear and the fiber of the fiberglass broke
due to
Has anyone tried to convert T800 's to 6m?
I believe there should be a chance with the TX T826 and RX T825.
They normally provide 66-88MHz.
Thank's for you answers in advance!
regards Joerg - OE6VHF
It's not strange at all, that's how most Groups are configured. But
those of us who read through the web interface do not see the
attachments, because Yahoo does not retain them. If you upload them
they become a part of the archive and everyone has access to them.
Some groups do not allow
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Repeater-Builder
group.
File: /Combiner.jpg
Uploaded by : w5zit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : Combine two audio signals to one input port
You can access this
Just remember heat rises so the hottest items usually go high in the stack ,
assuming you have a top mounted fan.
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:50:41 +
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 19 rack positioning question
Barry,
With all due respect, I think the appropriate response to your statement is:
Not necessarily.
The typical Motorola Micor 100 watt repeater station will have the duplexer
at the very bottom of the cabinet, with the power supply just above it.
Then follows the unified chassis, and finally
Hi Barry,
My 2 cents! A 100 watt Micor lofts along regardless of temp. If you can
stand it, so can a Micor. Not all of us have 72 degree air conditioned, clean
rooms! If your PA has the BIG heatsink, its continuous duty, the mobile
heatsink need some cooling because they are only rated
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, TGundo 2003 wrote:
My only input is that heat rises, and the heat of the PS will rise and
keep the duplexer warm. I would be concerned that the heating of the
duplexer (and likely cooling at off-peak times or climate change)
would cause the metallic parts in the
In my industry we also use rack mounting which is quite the reverse , with fan
forced air flow to move the heat so in my experience I stick by the comments
.Frankly having just installed a 3000 va ups here recently I prefer it being
off the floor anyway .
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
I mount heavy stuff at the bottom of the rack, lighter stuff working
upwards. Heat rise is incidental to my overall systems, those components
are designed to take it. Yes, fans move the ambient temperature around.
In the grand scheme of things, it has never been an issue for me. VHF
duplexers
I put a VHF repeater together this summer in a
Stromberg Carlson cabinet that the phone company
retired and had to install a fan in the top of the
cabinet to get the heat removed. The cabinet was
insulated with one inch foam on top, bottom, sides and
doors. It was a side-by-side rack cabnet with
Very familiar with these , wonderfully well made and will outlast all of us
although in my part of the world they have fans Std .
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:39:45 -0800
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 19 rack positioning question
I agree. This rack had the mounting for the fans, but
they had been stripped out by the time it made it to
us. The hard part was figuring out just what
dimension fan would fit -
73 - Jim W5ZIT
--- Barry C' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very familiar with these , wonderfully well made and
20 matches
Mail list logo
