Vern, The TS64 can work very well to supply both tone decode and tone encode
for a Mastr II mobile that has been converted to a repeater. A couple of
things to keep in mind:
The transmit tone can be keyed such that the tone is only transmitted while
there is a user signal on the input of the
I don't see anything like that. If anyone knows where to
get one I would sure like to have that before I order the
TS-64DS from Tessco.
Thanks,
Vern
KI4ONW
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:27:47 -0600
George Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last I knew, ComSpec had a version (TS-64MSTR) that was
a
Look at the bottom of this page where it says Direct Plugin Tone Boards.
http://www.com-spec.com/nucat2.htm
Johnny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see anything like that. If anyone knows where to
get one I would sure like to have that before I order the
TS-64DS from Tessco.
Thanks,
Hi Gang, I have received a uhf 5000 less pa unit and am therefor
presented with plugs and sockets hanging out of the rf tray! They are
as follows
9 way power sil socket ...red,white,brown,black,blue,orange,green
6 way plug to pa metering...green,black,white,red,brown,orange
40 way ribbon
Ahh in the catalog but not on the website! Thanks!
One more question before I put in my order. I have an
RC1000 controller am I better interfacing to the radio or
the controller. I think radio because I run Echolink and
have that going right from the radio audio so doing it at
the radio
I've always ordered directly from CommSpec. The plug-in boards are listed at
the bottom of one of the catalog pages, at
http://www.com-spec.com/nucat2.htm.
George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 29, 2008 8:13 AM
To:
Hello,
Can anyone provide information such as band and power output for a
Motorola amplifer part TLC1050B.
It is a 40 pound beast with black painted heatsink. Looks like an
MSF5000 amplifier. The RF in and out connectors are chassis mount N-
females with out a pigtail if that helps any.
I agree with Mike. As owner of Repeater-Builder, (the company) I get more
than my fair share of these types of e-mail myself. Sometimes it makes for a
good chuckle, but more often it just makes me sad to think of all the
information we provide; and yet some people are too lazy to read and
You constantly see that on all kinds of discussion lists. Rather than read
the manual, search the message archive, or use Google, they'll just fire off
a message with a stupid question that was asked just days earlier.
Richard
http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
_
From:
With all of the excellent info and resources, this is without a doubt
the very best available. You are correct. It points up the let the
other guy do it syndrome I always thought one had to have a bit of
technical knowledge to get a license. I'm beginning to wonder if they
come with baseball
Scott,
I for one will be reluctant to ask on line again in fear of falling into the
baseball card category licensee. My expertise is in the law and I understand
that everyone don't know how to find the massive information and I agree
some are lazy, me included sometimes. I didn't know this was
This is a common problem on e-mail reflectors, and message boards. No one is
saying don't ask/post/e-mail. They are saying, search the web, and read the
information, and if you still have questions, then ask.
You stated you know the law. Not sure which law school you went to, or how they
You mean like the perpetual LMR400/9913 feedline question that comes up every
other week ;-)
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Richard
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] The emails we get at
I NEVER said anything about baseball card license
DON'T PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH
I knew Mike and my comments were going to be taken out of context. Some days it
just doesn't pay to get out of bed.
Jim, You know exactly what types of emailers we were talking about, and that we
not referring
Wasn't the original post on this subject about the emails sent directly
to the repeater-builder webmaster and owners and not about the post that
are made to the email reflector? If so I believe this discussion has
got off course.
Dexter
Might be off topic. If so, I apologize..To all hams communicating while
mobile in New Jersey, please note the new Bill preventing cell phone
(electronic communications devices) goes into effect tomorrow March 1,2008.
Ham radio
is not effected by this Legislative action. So you can
At 06:13 PM 2/28/2008, you wrote:
(click on the link and look at it - it's obviously intended for
a scanner. The $2 suggests that there probably isn't
much there...)
Awww damn! And here I was hoping to throw away all my
AngleLinear preamps and replace 'em with this one.
Think of all the
What?!?!?!
Not even a little snide comment about the suitability of LMR in duplex
service as you walked by? ;-
skipp025 wrote:
I passed the Times (the mfgrs of LMR coax) Booth at the Vegas IWCE show
this week. They like everyone else tried to talk people over to show
their products. I
I'll save you even more by buying your Angles for $3 each!
;-
Joe M.
Ken Arck wrote:
At 06:13 PM 2/28/2008, you wrote:
(click on the link and look at it - it's obviously intended for
a scanner. The $2 suggests that there probably isn't
much there...)
Awww damn! And here I was
I passed the Times (the mfgrs of LMR coax) Booth at the Vegas IWCE show
this week. They like everyone else tried to talk people over to show
their products. I just smiled and told them I wouldn't be interested...
these are not the droids you're looking for... move along
Great to meet some
Dave,
There is a wealth of information available at:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/motorola/msf/msf-index.html
Be sure to drill down through the sub-pages and links...
Also, the UHF Repeater Station Service Manual is available from Motorola:
Part #6881062E75
Price is $57.52 USD available from
Oh gawd... I haven't heard about that.. That reaks of the 75ohm CATV
crap hardline that some hams try and use with matching transformers..
DCFluX wrote:
I'd be more worried with the oxidation of the 'new' aluminum heliax
and the connectors.
On 2/29/08, Jay Urish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apparently copper is too expensive and no one wanted to raise the
price of the end product.
On 2/29/08, Jay Urish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh gawd... I haven't heard about that.. That reaks of the 75ohm CATV
crap hardline that some hams try and use with matching transformers..
DCFluX
I'd be more worried with the oxidation of the 'new' aluminum heliax
and the connectors.
On 2/29/08, Jay Urish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What?!?!?!
Not even a little snide comment about the suitability of LMR in duplex
service as you walked by? ;-
skipp025 wrote:
I passed the
I passed the Times (the mfgrs of LMR coax) Booth at the Vegas IWCE show
this week. They like everyone else tried to talk people over to show
their products. I just smiled and told them I wouldn't be interested...
these are not the droids you're looking for... move along
Great to meet some of
It was, but it's also a common problem on discussion lists, so it was a
natural progression.
Richard
http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:39 AM
To:
Back around 1978 or 1979 we installed a UHF system at work and the two
control station installations used 50-ohm, 1/2, smooth aluminum hardline.
Both installations are still in place and still work like the day they were
installed. Just sharing an observation. In fact, one of the control
Hey I did that! I had a run of about 120 feet and used the CATV
hardline with homemade transformers on VHF. It worked great for about 2
years till I had to dismantle everything and move. I think I still have
the procedures on how to make the matching transformers around here
somewhere.
Yep.
And here's an article on it
See
http://www.repeater-builder.com/ge/mastr2/ts-64-mastr2-mod/ts-64-mastr2-mod.html
Mike
At 09:27 PM 02/28/08, you wrote:
Last I knew, ComSpec had a version (TS-64MSTR) that was a direct plug-in
for the M-II mobile... can't get much easier than that!
We have a similar law here in CA that will take effect on 7/1/2008 re: cell
phones, with the same exemptions for two-way radios.
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008
Someone wrote:
Wasn't the original post on this subject about the emails sent directly
to the repeater-builder webmaster and owners and not about the post that
are made to the email reflector? If so I believe this discussion has
got off course.
Yes, Exactly
Here is one for you to
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Eric M. wrote:
Hey I did that! I had a run of about 120 feet and used the CATV
hardline with homemade transformers on VHF. It worked great for about
2 years till I had to dismantle everything and move. I think I still
have the procedures on how to make the matching
Are you talking about me again Scott? ;)
By the way the 220 repeater is doing well. Still waiting to get the remote
site in operation.
Tim KB2MFS
N4CKV/R
It looked good, there was no visible oxidization.
The end that was placed on the end of the CATV hard line was taped with
3 passes of electrical tape and covered in silicone, very well sealed.
The other end had and so-239 soldered to the tubing so I could connect
to the antenna, so it was
***
The ARRL Letter
Vol. 27, No. 8
February 29, 2008
***
ARRL, FCC, Department of Defense Review New Developments in PAVE PAWS
Interference Mitigation
The FCC, ARRL representatives and agents of the various US Air Force units
working on developing a plan to mitigate
Eric M. wrote:
I found the article on how to build these, I will scan it and see how
it looks, unfortunately what I have looks like a copy of a copy. The
article was done by KA9LNV who is now K9EK.
There is already an article on how to _properly_ build and deploy these
Saw that article before (forgot about it, memory is the second thing to
go), same principle as in the article I have here. Guess I don't need
to scan it. Thats one less thing to do, thanks Kevin.
Eric.
Kevin Custer wrote:
Eric M. wrote:
I found the article on how to build these, I
37 matches
Mail list logo
