At 08:52 PM 11/23/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Is the 110 coming back?
Yes, at some point. Although other projects currently have priority
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater
At 04:27 PM 11/22/2005 +, you wrote:
Well, for one it will limit any locally generated mixing products
resulting from rectification in the PA transistors.
---Yes it will. But that is not the cause of desense, that is one of the
causes of intermodulation products.
Ken
At 08:15 AM 11/22/2005 -0800, you wrote:
I once had an Exec II RFPA that didn't like the duplexer load it was
TXing into. Had massive desense unless there was a circulator between the
TX duplexer.
---Makes sense. I know all about PA's driving a reactive load :-)
Ken
At 09:09 AM 11/22/2005 -0800, you wrote:
The resistive load isn't an antenna either.
---I generally face little resistance when it comes to antennae...
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of
At 06:41 PM 11/22/2005 -, you wrote:
Because all that unmatched stray rf is very often
looking for some place betta' (or worse) to go.
though I wouldn't qualify it as a fix for desense.
---That's my point. The symptoms (and causes) of intermod are not the same
as the symptoms (and
At 10:47 AM 11/22/2005 -0800, you wrote:
If anything is coming back down the antennaand through
the duplexer and mixing in the PA, the circulator will
prevent or reduce that effect.
---Absolutely correct. BUT that is not the same thing as desense nor are
the symptoms the same.
You said the
At 10:54 AM 11/22/2005 -0800, you wrote:
If the PA and duplexer weren't happy together,
wouldn't I also get desense when running on the dummy
load also? Remember it's perfectly happy on a 500w
Bird load.
---You answered your own question. Suspect the antenna, feedline or both.
Ken
At 08:00 PM 11/21/2005 -0500, you wrote:
i want to know about the Flat audio ? and what is the applicaion for it
---Flat audio is what happens when you leave your opened bottle of audio
on the coffee table overnight
Ken
At 08:26 PM 11/21/2005 -0500, you wrote:
No, Ken. Flat audio is what you get when your HT is run over by a
pavement roller.
---Unless it's a vibrating pager that is run over. Then you have a pancake
motor.
Ken
--
At 01:14 PM 11/14/2005 -, you wrote:
I know that this has been asked before, but does anyone know of a
commercial diplexer with a higher power rating so that one can use one
dualband antenna at the repeater site for both a VHF and UHF repeater.
While I don't use a dualband antenna, I
Guess I've been lucky so far then. 5 years and going strong
But I will keep a watchful eye out!
Ken
At 09:59 AM 11/14/2005 -0500, you wrote:
I have found that most amateur band couplers or diplexers
do not seem to operate well in full duplex 100 watt 2x environments
for very long.
At 07:31 AM 11/12/2005 -0800, you wrote:
Joe, all I can say is Good Luck. Commercial sites are getting difficult to
get, they don't want to allow amatuer on the towers.
---It might be worth looking to private land owners for sites. Small,
secure buildings (approx 8 X 8) aren't that expensive
At 03:39 PM 8/26/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Well I am cleaning out the parts drawers and I found a 5 watt amp for an
HT-220.It is older than dirt but it is good.
--- I assume since you said 5 watt, as opposed to 4 watt, it's a VHF one?
Ken
At 09:59 PM 8/23/2005 -0400, you wrote:
I never cease to be amazed by the number of people whom don't understand
that the PERIOD is the important thing here and that it was in the correct
place.
---I suspect most pre-menopausal women certainly know this!
Ken
(sorry, couldn't resist...)
At 09:16 PM 8/15/2005 -0400, you wrote:
*$5.00* Motorola Emergency HT RED in color
---Oh man! I haven't seen a red HT220 for 30 years! I just may have to
grab for posterity!
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom
At 03:46 PM 8/11/2005 -, you wrote:
I have an Nuelink Transmitter, model RFL-TV4 that had an original xtal
in it of 145.390. I ordered a new xtal for the transmitter at
145.410. I put the xtal in, and it does not oscillate at 145.410, but
rahter at 145.383. Thought the xtal was bad, had
At 09:20 AM 8/11/2005 -0700, you wrote:
If you have the schematic, I'd look closely at the oscillator
---Oh, one other thing. You did try to pull it on channel by adjusting
either the associated trimmer cap or adjustable inductor, yes?
Ken
At 09:46 PM 8/11/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Neil, I have a CTCSS decoder 131.8 on My 444.750 Micor unified Repeater. I
Have cable leakage so bad on the input 449.750 it keys up the repeater a
lot, Even with the PL
---Well...there's always DPL :-)
Ken
At 06:28 PM 8/5/2005 -, you wrote:
I have a Micor Motorola mobile repeater operating on 147.165 MHz
and I have foreign broadcast transmitting on a frequency of 11.700
MHz which is getting into the IF section of my receiver which also
operates on the same frequency 11.700 MHz so my
At 03:20 PM 8/5/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Not very well, but yeah, there's usually enough FM (maybe phase shift as
it bounces off the atmosphere?) in the station to hear something, but
it's not very intelligible.
---Well, I don't buy it. I have never heard of a case where a foreign
shortwave
At 12:40 PM 8/5/2005 -0700, you wrote:
VOA.
---VOA isn't broadcast overseas but in NC I believe? Field strength has
got to be a definate factor!
Ken
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from
At 03:54 PM 8/5/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Yeah, it actually happend to us, with a Micor rx mounted in a
non-unified chassis separated from the rest of the base. Other then the
pop-on shield on top, no other shielding except the rack cabinet, and
when the ground got pulled off, we started hearing
At 10:50 AM 7/31/2005 -0700, you wrote:
LMR400 (not flex!) by times microwave if on a budget.
NO! Bad bad bad bad!
One should NEVER use these type cables in full-duplex service, as you're
just asking for trouble.
This is a topic that has reached dead horse status on this list and I'm
At 09:42 PM 7/26/2005 -0400, you wrote:
My email address is being spoofed. It's not me.
If you look at my name associated with this reply, you'll see I use my real
name, while the spoofer uses Kuggie
You'll also note that the date is of a time in the future, not the real time.
---Anyone
At 01:48 AM 7/22/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Yeah Right USDHS is the First step to being American Nazis
I Vant to see your papers
-Between the above comment and your signature, I'm thinking you had a
bad experience with HS?
Either that or you're a Michael Moore fan?
Ken
(sorry, I've never
At 10:20 AM 7/22/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Sorry, Ken-look at that again. One doesn't normally put a cavity between
the output of the duplexer and the antennait would have to be broad
enough to pass both tx and rx.
---Ooops! Didn't catch the between duplexer and antenna part (that's what
I
At 08:01 PM 7/22/2005 -, you wrote:
Thanks to all who reply to this thread !!!
real pain only happens bring UP THE repeater !
Yet never keys up on it owen ?
---Yep, sounds exactly like a mix that involves your own repeater's
transmitter. Obviously, there's something else out there that,
At 08:17 PM 7/21/2005 -, you wrote:
How common is it to use a band pass filter ahead of a pass-reject
duplexer, i.e., between the duplexer and feed line to antenna. Any
reason for adding a band pass filter there on antenna input to
duplexer vs. between the preamp pre selector cavities
At 08:45 PM 7/21/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker?
---Looks like a set of wig-wags to me...
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom
At 05:54 PM 7/21/2005 -0700, you wrote:
I would not put a BP cavity between the duplexer and the antenna, simply
because such a cavity would diminish the function of the duplexer.
---Gotta disagree with you here, Eric. Depending on the underlying
problem, the addition of a single BP cavity can
At 12:58 AM 7/21/2005 -, you wrote:
Are already have a quiet receiver and very good Sensitivity MOTOROLA
MICOR radio VHF but occasionally have problem with RF getting back in
to receiver ended only happen at night and not every night when
they're GOOD conditions repeater RF feedback gets in
The Judge handed down a sentence of 120 days less 5 days for time served
followed by 3 years of probation. a fine of $1000.00 + assessments which
came to $3876.00 and must be paid within 1 year.
Gee, crime *does* pay.
Ken
At 10:43 AM 7/14/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Perception is not a basis for a violation, it would seem that there may be
parts
of the occurrence missing from the story.
---This occurs to me as well. It's hard to believe that he'd even be
charged without meeting more of the requisites of the statute.
At 04:08 PM 7/8/2005 +, you wrote:
Why would present any more problems on GMRS then with the ARS. If you
don't want unauthoriced (unlicensed) users you don't have to connect your
radio/repeater to a computer.
---Not to get into a pissing contest over which VOIP system is the best
but but the
At 07:18 PM 7/8/2005 -0400, you wrote:
The 7000 has a spurious spec of 85 db or better, but I don't believe much
the foreign companies say.
---It's not spurs that are necessarily the problem. It's wideband
garbaaage, otherwise known as plain ol' wideband noise. Solid state
exciters/amps
At 01:15 AM 7/9/2005 -, you wrote:
A good point It might be money well spent to consult a lawyer and
perhaps set up a LLC (limited liability corp) to own the property
(while you own the LLC).
---An LLC isn't a corporation. It's the same as
At 02:35 AM 7/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Over 30 years ago, when Standard introduced the first japanese mobile
radios to the USA, the model 806 and 826, some of the users of the
146.82 system were being heard by the Torrance (one of the 86
communities that make up Los Angeles county) police
At 02:57 PM 7/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Was it Roland Sammelman?
---I'm not really sure! I can't even remember his call :-). But he was
well-known at the time (and the 37/97 machine was hot property back in the
70's!).
Then there was the one particular W6 who just would not get his
radio
At 01:48 AM 7/6/2005 -, you wrote:
Ok, the situation is that my repeater is being heard by commercial
aircraft on 132.950 Mhz. At first they was able to identify one user
of the system, this was in June. Then again the repeater was heard on
June 22, this time stating they could hear
At 10:39 AM 7/2/2005 -0400, you wrote:
So, no one here has ever run into this before? Really??!
To restate what the problem is: Micor mobile UHF T34...
when running in the ham band transmit low / receive high
they are spurring 910 kHz above the transmit freq. I don't
know what would happen
At 06:40 PM 7/2/2005 -0700, you wrote:
If this helps, as soon as I unplug the radio from the irlp interface,
PTT goes out.. When I plug my Mic out cable into my MIC jack on my
sound card, I get nothing but squelch...
---Obvious question is. what is the voltage on the PTT line when you
Dave
Splatter infers a signal wide enough to spill over to an adjacent
channel. Indeed, your description of them hearing your xmtr 30 KHz away
confirms that.
It is not an issue of duplexer tuning nor is it likely one of xmtr tuning.
It is a matter of either over-deviating for one reason or
At 05:17 AM 6/22/2005 -, you wrote:
A question for someone who has working knowledge of the IFR 1200/A
Service Monitor. Will this monitor act like a frequency counter and
read frequencies off the air? I have been unable to find the answer.
That is a basic function of *any* service
At 03:05 PM 6/22/2005 EDT, you wrote:
Both look brand new out of the box. I have a decision to make which one to
sell and for how much. Any suggestions?
---You should sell the 1600 to me for $100.
Ken
(well, you asked for suggestions!)
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on
At 12:21 PM 6/21/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Always terminate the un-used port in a 50 ohm load.
---Of course but I'm a firm believe in using a pad on every port. It's the
only way to guarantee a 50 ohm load on them.
Ken
At 11:03 AM 6/15/2005 -0400, you wrote:
That's why I was surprised to hear WV went to UHF (from LB) for their
state-wide system! I've driven through WV, even 2M dosen't get into some
of those valleys.
---Sometimes I wonder exactly where APCO is coming fromI guess all one
needs do it read
At 05:18 PM 6/15/2005 -0700, you wrote:
It sometimes helps to
use 6 dB attenuators on either side of the cavity when tuning in this
manner, so
that a relatively uniform impedance is presented.
---I would argue that you should ALWAYS use a pad (3 or 6 dB) when tuning
a cavity. If for no other
What's ur call?
Ken
At 10:28 AM 6/14/2005 -, you wrote:
HAM RADIO EQUIPMENT FOR SALE
The lists is growing, I have included more stuff for sale in my
catalog. You
can browse thru the photos and descriptions to see the stuff.
Click on my link
http://a1cmugs.com/v-web/gallery/albums.php
I
You're worried about less than 3 Db? Why?
Ken
At 07:23 PM 6/14/2005 -, you wrote:
Hello all from Don KA9QJG, I have a Hamtronics 220 Exciter T-301
Peaked at 2 Watts That is driving My TE-System repeater amp gives me
80 Watts, Amp is rated at 130 Watts Continues, With the 80 Going into
the
At 02:44 PM 6/14/2005 -0500, you wrote:
I have Some Ham Friends who work in the Steel Mills near Gary Ind, they
cannot get into the Local 2 Meter Repeater . but can get in on 220, But not
Hear it very good so I thought just Maybe a little more wattage from My
cottage might just help penetrate
At 03:20 PM 6/14/2005 -0700, you wrote:
The extra will not make the difference, trust me, I went from 100 watts at
the antenna to 85 watts and no one knows the difference. The problem that
you are dealing with is a supherp amount of intermod in that city.
My take on the problem is that of
At 06:37 PM 6/14/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Hey Ken,
It's dB ... not Db ...
---Actually Neil, it's a little known factoid of History that Bell was
actually more concerned in roadway paving than he was in working out any
sort of logorythmic scale. But as so often happens, he found that the
At 08:55 PM 6/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Looking for anyone that is using a controller such as the Link Comm. Club
Deluxe with a TKR-750K2.
Is it possible to turn on/off the K2 internal functions via controller
outputs?
---Exactly which internal functions are you looking to control?
Ken
At 04:35 PM 6/12/2005 -0700, you wrote:
On 6/12/05, Bruce Nanney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can the notches be made for 440 with 7/8 heliax? I need to notch out
442.675 from getting into 449.975 and 449.950. Can notches be made to do
this?
---Just bear in mind that coaxial stubs like these are
At 07:21 AM 6/9/2005 -0400, you wrote:
The pin is TOR or tone on receive. (pin-24)
That depends on which Aux Output you program to be TOR. But that still
doesn't change the fact that you can't control encoded tone once the
transmitter has come up. Sorry but not even Dean can change that :-)
At 04:05 PM 6/9/2005 -, you wrote:
If there was enough demand for said function, I can
and would pass it on to the software guys back at
Kenwood. They do pay attention to valid feedback.
---Let's talk about Kenwood's lack of response to the TKR's deemphasis
curve being wrong then. I know
At 10:56 PM 6/9/2005 -, you wrote:
Email me the specific problem, how you measured it
and how you think the response should be. I'll get
the reply back to the proper engineering people
and find out what they have to say about it.
--The specific issue, as I've experienced it, is as
.
To be honest, the application is semi non conventional
for the majority of the people using the repeater. But
it's not something unreasonable to ask about.
Verify my assumption and I'll get on the phone to
the mother ship Friday or Monday.
thanks
skipp
Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
At 07:34 PM 6/8/2005 -0500, you wrote:
This would help in the case of an approaching thunderstorm, where the
charged leaders are beginning to form.
---You could always just have a beer. Then 30 minutes later, you'd have a
Corona discharge!
Ken
At 06:14 PM 6/8/2005 -0700, you wrote:
There is a fuse on it. I don't have the book handy and can't remember
the exact size.
---An educated guess for a 100 watt out UHF amp would be a 25 amp fuse...
Ken
--
President and
At 08:44 PM 6/8/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Look in the software :optional features,AUX inputs; there is Aux In pins
that you program diferent actions, program one for QT/DQT encode
enable/disable and control it with one of the output lines of the RLC-3
---Sorry but that won't work. Kenwood's
At 05:27 PM 6/7/2005 -, you wrote:
Some of after-market audio squelch boards have
small uP's on board. I'm not seeing a lot of stated
time values on their respective data sheets/manuals.
---Our currently in development RC810 controller has on-board multilevel
squelch per port. The beauty
At 01:35 PM 6/7/2005 -0500, you wrote:
At what modulation index will the 1st Bessell null occur?
-2.405
What do I win? :-)
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater
At 11:22 AM 6/6/2005 -0500, you wrote:
well for some reason i just can not think of this. or im getting to old
,,hehe
what is the formula for DB ( power )?
---Here's a link:
https://ewhdbks.mugu.navy.mil/decibel.htm
Ken
We're talking an HLN-4020A, dual reed type.
Either I missed it or it can't be done but is there any way to full
duplex the thing? The reedless 4181 deck does it but not the dual reed one?
Ken
--
President and CTO -
At 05:47 PM 6/3/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Have tried with the dual reed board, it can't,
---Thanks, I was afraid of that. No biggie, this is just a backup radio I
was getting ready anyway...
Ken
--
President and CTO -
At 03:36 PM 6/1/2005 -, you wrote:
What is the repeater controller of choice these days
We have IRLP Echolink on the repeater also
Right now it is VHF only however down the line we might want to add UHF
I would be interested in your suggestions
---May I suggest ours?
At 05:10 AM 5/23/2005 -, you wrote:
I was looking at using a MFJ-9406 6 Meter SSB radio for a 6 meter
remote base at my reapeater site. Any Ideas on how to get a COS/COR
signal out. I thought about using a CAT Tech SQ-1000 Squelch board but
didn't know how it would handle the pulsing nature of
At 09:26 AM 5/23/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Can you direct me to the schematic for the squelch circut?
---Sorry about that! This was a project I did many years ago and haven't
looked at for a while (hence the lack of a link to the schematic on the
webpage!)
http://www.ah6le.net/hfsquelch.bmp
Ken
At 09:47 AM 5/23/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Motorola made a voice sensitive squelch circuit for the HF Micom
2-way a number of years ago. In those days, was all separate
components - the diagram is available if you are interested.
---Yep they did! The one I built was patterned after the Micom
At 12:42 PM 5/18/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Every year they try to find a new way to
make money off the vendors or make it more of a pain to them.
---Well, don't forget you're talking about an event held in a city in
Ohio. No doubt the City Fathers tax the living crap out of everything and
do so
At 12:56 PM 5/18/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Anyone taking bets on how high the gas prices will mysteriously raise
for the weekend? I'm betting $2.37. Not that it's gouging or anything.
---Only $2.37? That's less than we're paying here in Oregon now!
Ken
At 10:04 PM 5/18/2005 -, you wrote:
Needed features:
- CWID / voice ID (would be sweet, but will settle for CW)
- LINKS to multiple half/full duplex repeaters (maybe control 2 or 3
repeaters)
- Built-in CTCSS encode/decode
- Remote-programmable
- Macros
- Switch sensors to broadcast alerts
At 02:43 PM 5/17/2005 -, you wrote:
Who's going, where to meet!
---From what I've gathered from reading posts about it, it seems many
folks are going to Dayton and they'll all be easy to spot, as they have
thining hair, a pot belly and will have a radio on their belt.
Ken
(well, at least I
At 11:10 AM 5/17/2005 -0700, you wrote:
I'm working on a theroretical design that uses 1 1/4 copper watter
pipe and 3/8 solid copper grounding rod, which should cost approx
$20-$25 per cavity, but I haven't built any thing in the real world
yet.
---Apparently it will only be used in controlled
At 12:34 PM 5/12/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Kenwood replaced the display on my V7a for free.
I sent it to the east coast repair center, and it came back nice and no
charge.
---If you bought the radio new, yep! They'd replace it for free. For those
of us who bought one used, we got to pay for a new
Has anyone had desence due to the fact that the repeaters antenna is
too close to the repeater its self? Like 12 feet of vertical
seperation and 2 feet horizontal?
---No but my father once told me I never used desense I was born with!
Ken
At 08:53 AM 5/11/2005 -0700, you wrote:
First, becuase I have them, they already tone in them
-Be advised that without modification, the packet COS out does NOT
track CTCSS in the V7a. In other words, it is always carrier based
regardless of CTCSS.
Ken
At 08:53 AM 5/11/2005 -0700, you wrote:
By the time I find 4 receivers that match, get 4 xtals, then tone boards,
the money would be the same, then only for a year later to find I have a
channel issue, then to buy another xtal, just change the vfo and I'm done.
I agree, you way sounds better,
At 01:59 PM 5/11/2005 -0400, you wrote:
How did you get a V7 for $200? The G707 goes for $265 or so!
--I was wondering that myself. I know the V7 is discontinued but that's
almost half off!
Ken
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
At 04:42 PM 5/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
At 04:32 PM 5/3/2005, w9mwq wrote:
The optoisolator would be a component that you would use to convert
logic levels from say 8V or 12V or 3V to 5V or some other voltage,
but you aren't going to move any power through one.
---sounds to me like what he
At 06:09 PM 5/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
I'm not sure what it is he's trying to run here, but that implies power.
---He's talking about translating the COS output of a V7a (which is an
active high of +5 volts) to +8 volts, needed by the voter. The simplest way
to do it would be with 2 NPN
At 06:41 PM 5/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
An opto certainly would get you there, then.
Digikey has some nice ones from Panasonic and NEC with CTR's above
10-0%, so you could doinverting or non-inverting conversion with only
the opto and a pair of resistors.
---Certainly the better engineered way
At 09:32 PM 5/1/2005 -, you wrote:
If he's a commertial operator ... ask him what he would have you do
with your antenna (stand with your back to the wall when you ask this)
;-) maybe he want's to give you the top spot. (Yea sure!) Maybe he
can offer a suggestion.
Co-phasing is usually kept
At 03:16 PM 4/24/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Of course you know the history of where the name TPL came from
... don't you?
---Ooooh, I do, I do! (don't forget I worked for the guy for a year or so)
Ken
--
President and
At 03:26 PM 4/24/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Oh yes ... you certainly do ...
---Whatever happened to him anyway? I lost track of him a few years after
he was CE at the company in Torrance I worked for (this was after he left
Pace).
Is he even alive these days?
Ken
At 03:36 PM 4/24/2005 -0700, you wrote:
The TPL line of RF Power Amplifiers came from the initials of
the guy who started TPL Communications 30 some odd years ago,
Thomas P. Litty.
---Actually, wasn't his last name spelled Liddy?
I think his ham call was K6RAD (Ken, please correct me
Remember Pace? Vaguely ... think that was the radio that had the
built-in microphonic modulator ... yelling at the radio produced
recoverable audio at the receiver.
---Hahahaa, yep that's the one! Man, you ARE an old fart, aren't ya?
But in all fairness, it was only one cheap line they
At 08:31 PM 4/24/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Hello All,
I just tore down a tower for someone and was given an antenna that
was sitting in their garage, did not get any specs on it. The label is
pretty much disintegrating but it says: Antenna Specialists, Made in
Ohio USA, Model Number ASPF 701.
At 09:58 AM 4/22/2005 -0500, you wrote:
At 07:22 AM 4/22/2005, Mathew Quaife wrote:
If these are like my TX/RX duplexers, the slighest movement of the
tuning rods makes a huge difference, especially on the tx
side. retune would be a good idea. Take them slow, they are fun to
tune. Enjoy!
At 10:25 PM 4/20/2005 -0400, you wrote:
The links within those pages work for you??? How so? They point to files
on his hard drive?
---Maybe you need to clear/refresh your cache? That or, he fixed the
links? They don't point to a local drive at all (anymore?)
Ken
Every link on
Ok...
Kevin posted a link:
http://www.qsl.net/w4xe/rpttech/rpttech1.htm
and he said While links in your Mastr Pro pages work, your Micor and Mastr
II pages do not.
I took that to mean that the links from the above url TO the Micor and
Mastr II pages don't work (and in fact, they do).
Once
At 09:53 PM 4/20/2005 -0400, you wrote:
While links in your Mastr Pro pages work, your Micor and Mastr II pages
do not.
--They work for me :-)
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art
At 09:25 AM 4/19/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Bottom line: Kenwood says not to run it at more then 25W in repeater
service. Period.
---Sorry Jim but that isn't what Kenwood says. They spec the TKR's at 100%
duty cycle @ 25 watts but they also plainly spec the 850 of being capable
of 40 watts at
At 07:08 PM 4/19/2005 -0700, you wrote:
You can run it at a higher power but NOT 100% duty cycle.
---At least Kenwood doesn't spec it as such :-) But you're right. While
they appear to be quite happy at the high power setting - even with hours
of continuous keydown - it isn't recommended.
Ken
At 02:27 PM 4/18/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Anyone have any info on a Phelps Dodge mobile duplexer model 638-509. It
has 4 cans, 2 for tx and 2 for rx.
Are they Bp, Br or what? Any data would help
---Most mobile duplexers of this type are notch only types. And with only
4 cavities, chances are it
At 04:14 PM 4/18/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Those repeaters are rated for 25 W for continuous duty repeater service,
so it is making rated power. In any case, I wouldn't run it beyond what
your getting.
---Not true. TKR-850's should make at least 40 watts when programmed for
high power.
At 11:42 PM 4/13/2005 -, you wrote:
I have set the deviation level of the repeater to 4.5 Khz, which for
most users is excellent, however I have a few users whom no matter
what radio they use, alwys clips well over 6 Khz wide. Is there a way
to limit this? When these users come in, you
At 05:30 PM 4/13/2005 -0700, you wrote:
If so, either it's not working correctly or you haven't set up your audio
levels correctly.
---Uhhh. make that if NOT :-)
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers
At 07:52 PM 4/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
The repeater is made up of a Maggoire HiPro transmitter, GE Mastr Pro ER41
receiver, Cat-1000 contoller. I am taking audio from the high side of the
volume control in the ER41. I've turned up the transmitter to 4.5 Khz and
the Cat-1000 tx level at right
501 - 600 of 796 matches
Mail list logo
