Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-30 Thread Scott Overstreet
wildly thanks to Sears who bought them out a few years ago. And Fry's started here too. Scott, N6NXI - Original Message - From: Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:50 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-29 Thread Wayne
A bit late replying, way behind on emails. OSH (Orchard Supply Hardware) was carrying a lot of heavy aluminum tubing, rods and more. I bought all of the aluminum for my J Poles from them. I don't know if they have stores in the bay area or not. I wonder, the Ringo Ranger, if it would

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-27 Thread rwhitetexas
: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:20 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna I've been trying to get a replacement cable for a Hygain HG-52SS. They recommended TT as the only possible (emphasis on that word) source. So, who would you recommend for them? Joe M

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-26 Thread n9wys
Gomberg Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:55 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna The shipping on a 20 foot long piece will be awful. You need a local source. In the Bay Area, there is a non-ferrous metal store at Davis

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-26 Thread MCH
I've been trying to get a replacement cable for a Hygain HG-52SS. They recommended TT as the only possible (emphasis on that word) source. So, who would you recommend for them? Joe M. Larry Wagoner wrote: At 05:11 PM 6/24/2008, you wrote: Doesn't Texas Towers and other such vendors sell

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-25 Thread Chris Carruba
ACE hardware stores stocks 10' aluminum poles Chris - Original Message From: n3dab [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:14:33 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna For anyone looking for a DB mast to mount

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-25 Thread Jim Brown
  W5ZIT --- On Tue, 6/24/08, Jim Cicirello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jim Cicirello [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 10:11 AM  Hi Ron   Another

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-25 Thread Jim Brown
he had in stock would not match the DB mast specs close enough to trust. 73 - Jim  W5ZIT --- On Tue, 6/24/08, n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, June 24

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-25 Thread Larry Wagoner
At 05:11 PM 6/24/2008, you wrote: Doesn't Texas Towers and other such vendors sell heavy-duty aluminum mast tubing? Why not try there? The only thing is, Mark, that I for one will never do any business with Texas Towers. We recently had a project to purchase radio equipment for area hospitals

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Folks We're moving a VHF amateur repeater to a 96' Trylon self supportingtower.  The overwhelming opinion is that our current 210C4 four bayfolded dipole would be too much of a weight and wind load for thattower. One

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread wd8chl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 6/23/2008 19:28, you wrote: Folks We're moving a VHF amateur repeater to a 96' Trylon self supporting tower. The overwhelming opinion is that our current 210C4 four bay folded dipole would be too much of a weight and wind load for that tower. One comment

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread N0ATH
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna At 6/23/2008 19:28, you wrote: Folks We're moving a VHF amateur repeater to a 96' Trylon self supporting tower. The overwhelming opinion is that our current 210C4 four bay folded dipole

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Jim Cicirello
- Original Message - From: Ron Wright To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 7:47 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Tony, First the Ringo-Ranger does not have the 7 dbi gain. To think a smaller 12 ft antenna would have about

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
:02 EDT To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Hi Ron Another Question Please: I was fortunate enough to buy a good DB224 without the support mast. After following the opinions on wind loading, etc. I am wondering what

RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Jim Cicirello
] On Behalf Of Ron Wright Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:23 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Jim, The DB224 is usually supplied with 2 clamps where each clamp attaches to the DB224 mast and the other side clamps

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Tony VE6MVP
At 09:09 AM 2008-06-24 -0500, N0ATH wrote: Put up the best one the clubs finances can possible be stretched to and you will end up spending the least in the in the long term. Club finances are in excellent shape. The club owned a tower for the last 30 years and was making reasonably money

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Daniel Brown
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your wind loading limits will require a smaller, lower gain antenna. If ice is a problem the Ringo-Ranger will probably not last that long. I would recommend going to www.tessco.com, a distributor of 2-way gear, and check

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your wind loading limits will require a smaller, lower gain antenna. If ice is a problem the Ringo-Ranger will probably not last that long. I would

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna At 09:09 AM 2008-06-24 -0500, N0ATH wrote: Put up the best one the clubsfinances can possible be stretched to and you willend up spending the least in the in the longterm. Club finances

Re: RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
: RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Ron,   Thanks for the mounting information. Ialso lack the DB224 Mast that the four dipoles mount on. From my research theoriginal is two pieces about twelve feet long that I believe bolt together, thediameter I have

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread n3dab
PROTECTED] mailto:ka2ajh%40gmail.com com Date: 2008/06/24 Tue AM 11:11:02 EDT To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Hi Ron Another Question Please: I was fortunate enough to buy a good

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Jim Cicirello
, June 24, 2008 12:23 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna Jim, The DB224 is usually supplied with 2 clamps where each clamp attaches to the DB224 mast and the other side clamps to the tower/mounting pipe. I

RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread n9wys
Isotropic vs. dipole... Isotropic is always a higher value. Mark - N9WYS -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Ron Wright --- snip --- Not sure now but for the commercial version it use to be advertised as 4.5 dbd gain, which I believe, but same ant

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread n9wys
Doesn't Texas Towers and other such vendors sell heavy-duty aluminum mast tubing? Why not try there? Mark - N9WYS -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of n3dab For anyone looking for a DB mast to mount their dipoles and harness on, check out all you

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-24 Thread Dave Gomberg
The shipping on a 20 foot long piece will be awful. You need a local source. In the Bay Area, there is a non-ferrous metal store at Davis and Doolittle in San Leandro. I got a piece of heavy wall 2.25 Al there. Wasn't cheap, but wasn't too bad either ($75?). At 15:11 6/24/2008, n9wys

[Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-23 Thread Tony VE6MVP
Folks We're moving a VHF amateur repeater to a 96' Trylon self supporting tower. The overwhelming opinion is that our current 210C4 four bay folded dipole would be too much of a weight and wind load for that tower. One comment has been the Ringo Ranger. The wind load of the Cushcraft

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-23 Thread Eric Lemmon
something better- much better! 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony VE6MVP Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:28 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-23 Thread Tony VE6MVP
At 07:46 PM 2008-06-23 -0700, Eric Lemmon wrote: Please pose your questions about tower loading to the manufacturer of your tower. Make certain you have the exact wind area and weight data for your antenna (not estimates or opinions) before you call Trylon. Ok, where can I find exact data for

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-23 Thread no6b
At 6/23/2008 19:28, you wrote: Folks We're moving a VHF amateur repeater to a 96' Trylon self supporting tower. The overwhelming opinion is that our current 210C4 four bay folded dipole would be too much of a weight and wind load for that tower. One comment has been the Ringo Ranger. In a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reasonably low wind load antenna

2008-06-23 Thread tubeguy
Try Sinclairs website. Here is a link to what you probably have: http://www.sinclairtechnologies.com/catalog/product.aspx?id=455 Maybe not but it's a start! Trylon makes all kinds of versions of there 96 foot versions. From the standard duty, medium duty, heavy duty Titan series all the way