RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-27 Thread Eric Lemmon
] On Behalf Of Pointman Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 9:56 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement So your suggestion is to get a Band pass/reject cavity instead? Or should I get 2 for the added isolation? keep in mind I am on UHF de

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-27 Thread no6b
At 11/26/2009 09:39, you wrote: You might need to add a several DB attenuator between the pre amp and the receiver to keep from over driving the front end. Not if you use a good receiver, or not use a preamp with too much gain. Bob NO6B What defines too much gain

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-27 Thread no6b
At 11/26/2009 10:08, you wrote: So what is the recommendation to set the loss of the BP cavity? I have a setting as to 3 db, 1 Db, .5 Db Etc. Running the ARR preamp on a UHF repeater, it seems the preamp is a little too much and we get a little desense. I am only running a 4 cavity duplexer

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-27 Thread no6b
At 11/27/2009 11:14, you wrote: I would have never considered a dual series RF Preamplifier layout viable until I'd seen one demonstrated against the single preamplifier version. The properly installed and setup dual preamplifier layout with system gain well in excess of 14dB clearly out preforms

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-27 Thread Nate Duehr
On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:14 PM, skipp025 wrote: There are Northern California site locations in operation where the Repeater Rx Antenna System contains the desired pre-selection, two series pre-amplifiers separated initially by an adjustable attenuator and later a fixed value. It's beyond

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread k7pfj
Hi Skip, Happy Thanksgiving first off. Go to the Angle Linear web site and read Chip's documentation he has provided. I don't know too many people that has a better product than him and his stuff if installed correctly works like no other. Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ From:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Eric Lemmon
Skipp, It seems as if both of your answers suggest that the preamp be installed in the same place- between the duplexer and the bandpass cavity. Perhaps your intent for the second situation was to suggest that the preamp be placed between the bandpass cavity and the receiver input. The site

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Mike Dietrich
The main way of thinking is that you want to put the pre-amp after the band pass filter. The reason for this is that if it is before the b/p filter, it amps anything it sees, noise and unwanted stuff alike. If its behind the b/p filter, it only amps the signals that are left and need it. You

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread wa2ar
Anyone have a spare bandpass filter tunable for the UHF amateur band like a DCI? Thanks! Alan - Original Message - From: Mike Dietrich To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread no6b
At 11/26/2009 07:31, you wrote: Mike Dietrich m.dietr...@... wrote: The main way of thinking is that you want to put the pre-amp after the band pass filter. The reason for this is that if it is before the b/p filter, it amps anything it sees, noise and unwanted stuff alike. If its

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread no6b
At 11/26/2009 08:14, you wrote: Thanks Glenn, I think I will it where it is since it is a Adv Receiver Research Gasfed. Good choice IMO. If you want to maximize your sensitivity, just make sure your pass cavity is very low loss. If the loops are or adjusted for 2 dB loss, you could easily

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Mel Swanberg
You might need to add a several DB attenuator between the pre amp and the receiver to keep from over driving the front end. Not if you use a good receiver, or not use a preamp with too much gain. Bob NO6B What defines too much gain can vary wildly. One trick I learned in

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread no6b
At 11/26/2009 08:30, you wrote: Ralph you bring up a good point of thought. The ham that built our repeater placed the Decibel Products 4002 Bandpass behind the Wacom 6 can duplexer and then followed by the ARR Gasfed P144VDG to the radio. Now where he built it was his tower site (an old ATT

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Pointman
. de KM3W From: n...@no6b.com n...@no6b.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, November 26, 2009 12:50:18 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement At 11/26/2009 08:30, you wrote: Ralph you bring up a good point of thought. The ham that built our repeater placed

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Eric Lemmon
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement So what is the recommendation to set the loss of the BP cavity? I have a setting as to 3 dB, 1 dB, .5 dB etc. Running the ARR preamp on a UHF repeater, it seems the preamp is a little too much and we get

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Gary Schafer
Of Mel Swanberg Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 12:40 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement You might need to add a several DB attenuator between the pre amp and the receiver to keep from over driving the front end

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread Pointman
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement A total insertion loss of about 1.0 dB works well, in my experience. With two 8 bandpass cavities in series, this gives at least 25 dB of isolation from the transmitter carrier at a 600 kHz split. Bear in mind that your notch cavity has