Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Bob M.
Back in the early 1970s, a local repeater used a slow-turning wheel and a roller microswitch to key a PL encoder for their CW ID. It was barely audible in most radios, but it got the job done. Of course, this was back in the days when repeaters didn't have or need coded squelch encode or decode,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
The stock MSF brain was designed for commercial use and runs the IDer every 15 minutes. If that parameter was changeable the unit would be legal under the amateur rules only as long as you had a way to remotely shut it off (maybe a digital output from the controller on another repeater at the same

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Jay Urish
I seem to recall that the suitcase programmer allowed me to set id time at 10min. Content is also adjustable..How else would you put your callsign in? Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote: The stock MSF brain was designed for commercial use and runs the IDer every 15 minutes. If that parameter was

RE: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff DePolo
Has anyone on the list adapted a modern controller for frequency-shift keying? I've taken a CWID'er and, combined with an LM386 audio amp, did collector modulated CW for link ID'ing by AC-coupling the CW audio into the power control circuitry. In broadcast we do FSK ID'ing, as well as MCW/AM,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Ron Wright
Paul, Most modern controllers put out tone CW for F2, FM modulated CW (technologically not legal ID), for IDing the repeater. This same output is most often used for the other tones such as tail beeps, response tones, etc. If it were used only for ID then could build a tone decoder or just

[Repeater-Builder] Results of ARRL D-STAR Web Survey

2007-11-27 Thread Mark Thompson
ARRLWeb Survey Results Poll date: November 16, 2007 Do you have any active D-STAR systems in your area? Yes, several 21.9 % (611) Yes, one 11.9 % (331) No, but one is going on the air soon 3.4 % (96) No, but we're in the planning stages 3.5 % (98) No 43.0 % (1200) I've never heard

Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Paul Plack
Ron, as far as I can tell from Part 97, ID may be done with any legal emission mode for the frequency, and tone-modulated CW and FSK are both legal, so long as bandwidth limits are observed. FSK must use 1kHz shift. Unlike a beacon station, the controller is expected to do much more than just

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Ron Wright
Paul, If you read part 97.119 CW can be used for IDing, not MCW as most all repeaters use. However, we've done this for years and there is something in law that if something has been a standard practice for length of time, think 30+ years long enough, then legal, hi. It's been discussed on

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Ron Wright
As with many Mot rig software and programming software some have hacked it to change thing like making rigs go into the Ham bands when Mot would not (must state this is often because the rigs were not type accepted for these out of band ops and I personally do not like using equipment not

RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff DePolo
If you read part 97.119 CW can be used for IDing, not MCW as most all repeaters use. 97.119(b)(2) says you can use a phone emission (i.e. voice), in English, to identify. 97.3(c)(5) is the definition for phone, which explicitly specifies MCW for the purposes of performing station

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Bob M.
The analog MSF5000s used MC6803 microprocessors in just about everything: the station itself, the tone remote control card, the MCS unit, etc. Yes, you probably can wade through 8kbytes of program space plus 4kbytes of code plug space and find the data that controls the CW ID speed etc. More

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Antenna Choice

2007-11-27 Thread skipp025
Dipole phasing is not easy even for the Decibel 420 type antennas. It is common for very sharp nearfield nulls and cancel areas expecially near and underneath a mountain top mounted antenna. I label the effect something similar to what I call unwanted nearfield/local re-entrant energy. Less

[Repeater-Builder] VHF Repeater Antenna Choice

2007-11-27 Thread Tony L.
Any comments on the difference between expected antenna patterns and coverage on a DB222 vs. Celwave/RFS PD220? I'm using a PD220 and find the local coverage to be somewhat spotty, but coverage 20 miles away to be excellent. Is this typical of the PD220? Would a DB222 fill local areas any

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Receiver overload

2007-11-27 Thread jimmyrtle
David, I had a similar problem with a 2 meter repeater at a high power FM site. When the FM broadcast transmitter was down the front end overload of my receiver (GE mastrII) went away. In my case it turned out to be RF from the FM transmitter floating on the AC power lines and making its way

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone Repeaters

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Stahl
I'm a Trucker and in my travels it seems that the link systems are about the only place anything is going on I can't tell you how many areas I've been where you open the repeater book, find a bunch of local machines and can't hear or raise a peep out of anyone . On the other hand linked

Re: [Repeater-Builder] VHF Repeater Antenna Choice

2007-11-27 Thread Milt
The PD220 has 5.25dB gain and 18 degrees vertical beamwidth. The DB222 has 3dB gain in the omni configuration, and 36 degrees vertical beamwidth. Vertical beamwidth is measured at the 3dB points on main lobe of the horizontal axis plot, so divide the published number in half and you can easily

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone Repeaters

2007-11-27 Thread dmurman
Steve, the reason you don't get anyone on the other repeaters is due to you not being known to them. Most repeater users will only talk to ones they know and a different call comes on the repeater they all of a sudden get mic fright and don't answer :) David = From:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread George Henry
-Original Message- From: Paul Plack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 27, 2007 7:55 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs Ron, as far as I can tell from Part 97, ID may be done with any legal emission mode for the frequency, and

Re: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Ron Wright
Bob, Yes most cannot do this or at least do not have the tools, but some do. A 6803 debugger would convert the op code to at least mnemonics and source code although labels and variables would not be identified. It would take some work to see what is going on, but is doable. A typical

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Needed: MSF-5000 Green TEE Cable

2007-11-27 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 05:02 AM 11/27/07, you wrote: I seem to recall that the suitcase programmer allowed me to set id time at 10min. Not according to the info available to me. Content is also adjustable..How else would you put your callsign in? I was referring to dynamic content - like adding (word space)BATT to

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MASTR II Mobile Preamp

2007-11-27 Thread mung
I've got it in there but I can't tell if it's doing anything. Hopefully we will have the service monitor back tomorrow and I and see if I can get that to tell me more. Vern On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:29:06 -0500 Scott Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vern, It's just as easy as it looks.

[Repeater-Builder] decibel products DB-4050-wdc-b vhf duplexer info needed

2007-11-27 Thread na6df
Folks, Looking for cable harness and tuning data for the Decibel Products DB-4050-wdc-b 8 cavity VHF duplexer. This is a 300khz spaced duplexer that is currently on 155mhz, and we need to move it down to 146mhz. Jim at DB Spectra is researching for me as well, but this is a pretty old unit, we

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 20 words per minute

2007-11-27 Thread Kevin Custer
I will remind everyone that this list is not for debating FCC rules. (1) By a CW emission. When keyed by an automatic device used only for identification, the speed must not exceed 20 words per minute; With that in mind, I'll make this comment and I expect it not to generate a reply from

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link IDs

2007-11-27 Thread Ron Wright
George, You are correct. From another posting F2 or audio CW or MCW is considered phone and phone can be used for IDing. 73, ron, n9ee/r From: George Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/11/27 Tue PM 01:37:12 CST To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FSK for Link