At 07:27 PM 11/27/05, you wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll bite... what does TAS stand for?
___
TAS = the absolute sound [www.theabsolutesound.com]
A high end audio publication.
Actually - I
That was my thought. But he missed April 1st.
Chuck
Al Wolfe wrote:
I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
73,
Al, K9SI
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
From: us_communications1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, I don't think so ...
Neil
Al Wolfe wrote:
I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
73,
Al, K9SI
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
From: us_communications1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: trying to build my first repeater
the
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, nj902 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, us_communications1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the
radios are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to
Slightly ...
Neil
Chuck Kelsey wrote:
That was my thought. But he missed April 1st.
Chuck
Al Wolfe wrote:
I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
73,
Al, K9SI
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
From: us_communications1 [EMAIL
Awesome, Hi Fidelity into my tinty sounding Kenwood, cheap external speaker, and better yet, that tiny little speaker in that tiny little HT. Why produce something that only so few radios will even notice the difference, if in fact you are able to make it. I heard and RC85 controller sound just
Perhaps I did not make myself clear. The repeater i am building will
be nearly hi-fidelity audio and such is why i intend to use tube
equipment. i worked in commercial 2 way radio in the 1960's and
worked in broadcasting in the 1970's. tube equipment in highly
reliable if properly maintained,
the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply
make little difference an any piece of equipment can be re-engineered
to perform a needed task. all that is needed is time and ability.
simultaneous transmit and receive will be addressed by seperate
antennas.
WHAT I AM LOOKING
At 01:10 AM 11/28/2005 -, you wrote:
WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the radios
are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to think of
using the higer quality tube equipment. this equipment is very
expensive and i was fortunate to have it donated to
First, who ever trained you must have been a brother to Maxwell Smart.
How do you plan to get the richest/fullest audio with +/-5KC
deviation. You should spend more time learning about building quality
repeaters and less time in the past.
A well designed class A amplifier will give you
At 02:37 AM 11/28/2005 -, you wrote:
First, who ever trained you must have been a brother to Maxwell Smart.
How do you plan to get the richest/fullest audio with +/-5KC
deviation.
---Not to mention that a proper metaphor would be about the winkest link
in the chain. After all, the
What frequency pair are you planning to put this on?
By the model numbers you gave, I seriously doubt the FCC will
allow those radios on any commercial 2-way radio frequency.
If going into the amateur radio band, you will need to adjust
the transmitter deviation to conform with your
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, us_communications1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the
radios are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to
think of using the higer quality tube equipment. ...
The transmitter in its present form - mobile chassis mount ... is
20% duty cycle at best.
us_communications1 wrote:
the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply
make little difference an any piece of equipment can be
re-engineered to perform a needed task.
The
Ok, I'll bite... what does TAS stand for?
Richard, N7TGB
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of nj902
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my
...
nj902 wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, us_communications1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS.
the radios are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the
first to think of using the higer quality tube equipment.
Perhaps I did not make myself clear. The repeater
i am building will be nearly hi-fidelity audio and
such is why i intend to use tube equipment.
Z.! oop's I fell asleep. A tube
repeater gear means you're obviously not paying the
utility bill. An old GE EP-38 has got to
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll bite... what does TAS stand for?
___
TAS = the absolute sound [www.theabsolutesound.com]
A high end audio publication.
Actually - I was just thinking - maybe we are
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful, my picture is in the Ken Sessions Book - Tab Books #1212.
__
I have the original hardcover published by Editors and Engineers Ltd.
I also
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater
What frequency pair are you planning to put this on?
By the model numbers you gave, I seriously doubt the FCC will
allow those radios on any commercial 2-way radio frequency.
If going into the amateur radio band
...
skipp025 wrote:
Perhaps I did not make myself clear. The repeater
i am building will be nearly hi-fidelity audio and
such is why i intend to use tube equipment.
Z.! oop's I fell asleep. A tube
repeater gear means you're obviously not paying the
utility bill.
Almost like the Heath-quit W5M audio amplifiers?
Neil
nj902 wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Ok, I'll bite... what does TAS stand for?
___
TAS = the absolute sound
I'm in the TAB Books #1212 only ... name and picture.
Neil
nj902 wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful, my picture is in the Ken Sessions Book - Tab Books #1212.
_
heard that Motorola still made a few of them as late as
about 1964.
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:57:13 -0800
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater
Here is a link to a pll (true FM) vhf Mastr II on Ebay. Throw that
old junk away and use one of these and you'll have a great sounding
reliable repeater. p
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=5835754755rd=1sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AITrd=1
p If you are really into tubes I know a
I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
73,
Al, K9SI
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
From: us_communications1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: trying to build my first repeater
the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply
make little
26 matches
Mail list logo
