Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Sanjiv Singh
FYI, we found the same issue while installing repoze.who-friendlyform and repoze.who from the tg2 index at http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/downloads/2.0b6/index/ On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, binet bruno binet.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've just tried to install repoze.who-friendlyform

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: There is the bug: the egg should not be called 'repoze.who-friendlyform', because that looks to setuptools the the 'friendlyform-1.0b2' version of the repoze.who package. The egg should be named 'repoze.who.friendlyform'.

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Gustavo Narea
On Friday February 27, 2009 15:57:46 Tres Seaver wrote: There is the bug: the egg should not be called 'repoze.who-friendlyform', because that looks to setuptools the the 'friendlyform-1.0b2' version of the repoze.who package. The egg should be named 'repoze.who.friendlyform'. Are you sure

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gustavo Narea wrote: On Friday February 27, 2009 15:57:46 Tres Seaver wrote: There is the bug: the egg should not be called 'repoze.who-friendlyform', because that looks to setuptools the the 'friendlyform-1.0b2' version of the repoze.who

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Malthe Borch
2009/2/27 Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net: Because you may work from an export, of a fork stored in git via git-svn, or any of many other reasons. I also consider adding a MANIFEST.in good form. There's a setuptools-plugin for git that'll make it behave like svn with regards to manifesting.

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: More packaging issues (note that I haven't actually used the package, I'm just looking at how it installs): - - Why is there a MANIFEST.in in the package? Setuptools already includes data

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Gustavo Narea
On Friday February 27, 2009 16:56:09 Tres Seaver wrote: Note that the downloaded file has an underscore, rather than a hyphen. Yes, but the distribution name is repoze.what-pylons. Then setuptools or PYPI replaces the hyphen with an underscore automatically -- I don't have to do it myself.

[Repoze-dev] [issue64] repoze.zope2 not compatible with zope 2.12 browser resources

2009-02-27 Thread Chris McDonough
New submission from Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com: Apparently repoze.zope2 calls the __call__ method of file resources rather than the GET method as it should, when trying to return a resource. Zope 3 browser resources:

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Gustavo Narea
On Friday February 27, 2009 16:56:09 Tres Seaver wrote: Are you sure that's the problem? I can install repoze.what-pylons, for example, with no problems: valencia ~: virtualenv --no-site-packages fakeenv New python executable in fakeenv/bin/python Installing setuptoolsdone.

Re: [Repoze-dev] bug: easy_install repoze.who-friendlyform

2009-02-27 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
Yes, but the distribution name is repoze.what-pylons. Then setuptools or PYPI replaces the hyphen with an underscore automatically -- I don't have to do it myself. For some reason, this automatic renaming is not being applied to repoze.who- friendlyform and repoze.who-testutil. I don't know

[Repoze-dev] repoze.who Test Utilities v1.0b1

2009-02-27 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello, everybody. I wanted to let you know about repoze.who-testutil, a repoze.who plugin to help you test protected areas in repoze.who-powered websites: http://code.gustavonarea.net/repoze.who-testutil/ Don't be fooled by the Beta 1: It's absolutely usable, 100% tested and 100% documented