[Repoze-dev] repoze.what.plugins.sql 1.0 and SQLAlchemy 0.7

2011-04-06 Thread Nathan
nce a new version of this plugin could be released with this import removed? Thanks, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.what.plugins.sql 1.0 and SQLAlchemy 0.7

2011-04-07 Thread Nathan
On 2011-04-07, at 9:10 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: > On 04/06/2011 11:03 PM, Nathan wrote: > >> Hopefully this is the right place to post this. The repoze bug >> tracker appears to be down so I couldn't post it there, either. > > I have restarted the roundup inst

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.what.plugins.sql 1.0 and SQLAlchemy 0.7

2011-04-07 Thread Nathan
I want to do > it some time soon. > > Cheers. > > - Gustavo. That's great, thanks so much! Cheers, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg.traversalwrapper and repoze.bfg 0.9.1, 1.0a1

2009-06-22 Thread Nathan Yergler
.bfg (perhaps) c) Update traversalwrapper to return *both* sets of keys I can see (c) being the correct choice if something other than repoze.bfg is currently using traversalwrapper. I'd love to write a quick patch and get things updated, just need a little guidance. Thanks, Nathan _

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg nginx mod_wsgi

2009-06-29 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
Anyone ever deploy repoze.bfg on nginx with mod_wsgi? Right now I'm just using proxy_pass to the paster serve for repoze.bfg, but it just seems more natural if this could be done using mod_wsgi. Any thoughts? Thanks, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg nginx mod_wsgi

2009-07-01 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
Hey Stephan, Your insight is pretty much everything I got out of researching too--right down to the links. Too bad. I'm no sys admin and I hate managing more servers than needed. I'm glad that I know I'm not missing out on anything though. Thanks for the info, Nathan 2

[Repoze-dev] repoze.who missing functionality?

2009-07-05 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
;Location', login_form_url) ] > > cookies = [(h,v) for (h,v) in app_headers if h.lower() == >> 'set-cookie'] > > headers = headers + forget_headers + cookies > > return HTTPFound(headers=headers) > > Doesn't seem to make sense to log a person out just because they are unauthorized does it? I'm really not sure and a little new to all this stuff so please tell me if there is a better way to do this sort of thing. thanks, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.who missing functionality?

2009-07-05 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
, it'd be nice to at least be able to manipulate who enough with plugins as opposed to monkey patching it to provide the functionality. Thanks, Nathan 10.4.4 403 Forbidden > >The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it. >Authorization will not help and the r

Re: [Repoze-dev] Package naming

2009-11-02 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
misleading in some cases. So I am in agreement with Malthe on this. I have thought the very same thing he is talking about here often. -Nathan Van Gheem On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/11/2 Martin Aspeli > >: > > I think it's better to use top

[Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-27 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
is issue and if there is something simple I may be doing wrong. some version info... repoze.zope2 = 1.0.3 repoze.vhm = 0.11 Plone = 3.3.3 Zope2 = 2.10.9 Thanks, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-27 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
ctions missing. I stepped into the code a bit and the "plone.contentactions" viewlet isn't even called when repoze.vhm is used. Thanks, Nathan On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Nathan Van Gheem

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-27 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
virtual_url_parts += real_path[1:] should simply be, > real_path = environ['PATH_INFO'].split('/') virtual_url_parts += real_path[1:] I'm probably missing something obvious though. If this is actually an issue that isn't specific to my setup, I find it

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-28 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
th the things needed for the repoze.zope2 1.0.2 release which relied gave more credence to repoze.vhm if I understand it correctly. Nothing in the log or tests, as far as I can tell, explains that it fixes a bug though. I wish I had more time to do a better job with this. All of your continued

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-29 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
OT = /example It does seem like we have a problem here as its chopping off the first part of the path with the xheaders setup. I'm surprised that the site works as well as it does with this kind of issue. Thanks again, Nathan On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Martin Aspeli > wrote: &

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-29 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
; well as it does with this kind of issue. > I think your configuration is incorrect: the 'X-Vhm-Root' header is supposed to signal the "phanotom" path prefix in the URL apparent to the app. It is. "/example" is the actual root of zope to prepend every req

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-29 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
along with the tests being fixed. I'm sorry if I made this a bigger deal than it really is--seems like a simple fix. I've been strapped for time and I'm just trying to do what I can... Let me know what you think. Thanks, Nathan On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Martin Aspeli > w

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.vhm and repoze.zope2 odd behavior

2009-12-31 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
#x27;m setting up a client with this. Also, I just came across it and thought it should be fixed I've gained svn access, created the branch, added tests and made the fix. I'll test it for a bit and once I feel good about it, merge it to the trunk. Thanks for all the help. -Nathan