On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 2 May 2010 22:03, Luciano Ramalho wrote:
>
>> In these, we don't store serialized objects, but just the data to
>> reconstruct the objects. But the data is not completely dismembered in
>> some normalized form.
>> In a semi-structured data
Am 04.05.2010, 23:45 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
> It's worth noting that many RDBMS's do now support recursive queries
> of some kind (Postgres introduced them in 8.4), though it's not yet
> ubiquitous.
Windowing functions and their ilk might well reinvigorate the RDBMS world.
They should by
On 4 May 2010 18:46, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 04.05.2010, 19:20 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
>
>> I suspect that databases such as CouchDB and the others you mention
>> are not well suited to graph traversal. Efficient traversal must occur
>> near the data, otherwise you pay the latency cost on e
Am 04.05.2010, 19:20 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
> I suspect that databases such as CouchDB and the others you mention
> are not well suited to graph traversal. Efficient traversal must occur
> near the data, otherwise you pay the latency cost on each edge
> traversed. In ZODB this is achieved th
On 2 May 2010 22:03, Luciano Ramalho wrote:
> In these, we don't store serialized objects, but just the data to
> reconstruct the objects. But the data is not completely dismembered in
> some normalized form.
> In a semi-structured database the data graph can follow very closely
> the original ob
Hi Luciano,
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 18:03 -0300, Luciano Ramalho wrote:
> BACKGROUND
>
> I was attracted to Zope in 1998 because it freed us from the
> clumsiness of the first normal form.
>
> Many in the Zope community can also boast membership of the NoSQL "old-guard".
>
> The ZODB is great, b
