On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> another thing: I think I've seen some packages which should be tagged
> "ftbfs_due_to_virtual_dependencies" in notes.git, though OTOH I seem to
> recall pbuilder learned to cope with that. Hm.
Currently there are 0 packages tagged w
Hi Santiago,
On Donnerstag, 26. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Yesterday night, in another email, Holger told me that perhaps those
> packages that I added and then removed should be added again.
>
> I started to write this reply but I think it is better to discuss it
> here as I think it
Hi.
Yesterday night, in another email, Holger told me that perhaps those
packages that I added and then removed should be added again.
I started to write this reply but I think it is better to discuss it
here as I think it could be of general interest.
Let me start by saying that IMHO none of t
Hi Santiago,
On Mittwoch, 25. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I was making package lists to check for "dpkg-buildpackage -A",
> for amd64 and for i386.
saw those bugs, nice work!
> Of those, cmucl FTBFS (just reported, without even using -A), so I
> went to reproducible.debian.net to conf
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > The "right" fix for this very little anomaly is that they should not
> > be in the list of packages to be built to begin with.
>
> nope, we have something better, see above :) how did you notice?
I was making package lists to chec
Hi Santiago,
On Mittwoch, 25. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > why? (eg bug number)
> Because their Architecture field in the Sources.gz file does not include
> amd64.
ah, ok, then please don't mention those in notes.git as they automatically
show up on
https://reproducible.debian.net/un
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:52:55PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On Mittwoch, 25. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > In addition to scsh-0.6, we should not be trying to build these
> > packages on amd64:
> >
> > cmucl
> > fenix
> > gnumach
>
> why? (eg b
Hi Santiago,
On Mittwoch, 25. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In addition to scsh-0.6, we should not be trying to build these
> packages on amd64:
>
> cmucl
> fenix
> gnumach
why? (eg bug number) - and should we blacklist them?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
D
