Hello Vagrant,
Am 19.07.2015 um 15:14 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote:
All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm
very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can
always decide to remove or move them later.
I
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late reply.
On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ?
This seems very minimalistic, but it's good to see U-Boot was given some
attention already!
:-)
but maybe you can explain why u-boot needs more
On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote:
All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm
very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can
always decide to remove or move them later.
I wish to make all contributions upstream. What would really help
Hi Paul,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
sorry for the late reply.
No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either.
I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we
came up with a nice way of doing things, using
Le dimanche 19 juillet 2015 à 17:47 +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit :
There seem to be two solutions to this:
* Including a script (e.g. the one from coreboot) to build the toolchain
as part of the build process
* Using native builds with visualization on the servers that run the
builds for
Hi,
On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I *think* that actually makes u-boot build reproducibly with Debian's
reproducible builds toolchain when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set, but I
haven't tested it fully. I might have missed some other sources of
non-determinism...
We came
Le dimanche 19 juillet 2015 à 06:14 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote:
All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm
very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can
always decide to remove or move them
sorry for the late reply.
No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either.
I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we
came up with a nice way of doing things, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
you've
Thanks for sharing the patches to set U_BOOT_DATE/U_BOOT_TIME/U_BOOT_TZ.
I happened to independently work on a similar patch in the last few
days:
Index: u-boot/Makefile
===
--- u-boot.orig/Makefile
+++ u-boot/Makefile
@@ -1231,10
