Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-15 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 15 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Nikolaus, > > On Samstag, 14. März 2015, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> > I can also reproduce this with s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-2.dsc pbuilding for >> > jessie. >> Alright, I'm at a loss: > [..] >> The current package (2.13+dfsg) builds just as fine. > > what's the se

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sonntag, 15. März 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: > what's the setting of BINDMOUNTS in your pbuilderrc? I've added /sys and > /proc to it today, which fixed some of the FTBFS we saw, but now s3ql's... not signature.asc Description: Th

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Nikolaus, On Samstag, 14. März 2015, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > I can also reproduce this with s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-2.dsc pbuilding for > > jessie. > Alright, I'm at a loss: [..] > The current package (2.13+dfsg) builds just as fine. what's the setting of BINDMOUNTS in your pbuilderrc? I've added /s

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-13 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 10 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > >> So, same result. Which probably means I can reproduce it locally on my >> laptop as well. Me tries... and gets the same result. So I suppose an (at >> least) important bug is in order... > > I can also reproduce this with s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-2.dsc pbui

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-10 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 10 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > did you try to reproduce the problem with pbuilder locally? I think it's >> > more likely a problem with pbuilder than with the reproducible stuff on >> > jenkins. (But I'm offline atm so I cannot test myself.) >> I tried, but for me it works just fine wi

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, > So, same result. Which probably means I can reproduce it locally on my > laptop as well. Me tries... and gets the same result. So I suppose an (at > least) important bug is in order... I can also reproduce this with s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-2.dsc pbuilding for jessie. cheers, Holger sig

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Nikolaus, On Dienstag, 3. März 2015, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > I managed to get the logs yesterday, but right now it seems down again: it seems you've found an unlucky time in terms of stability of the service, usually it's up all the times... > > did you try to reproduce the problem with pbui

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-03 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 03 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Nikolas, > > On Montag, 2. März 2015, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Almost certain. I could be certain if I could see the log with the >> failed test, but it seems that port 80 on reproducible.debian.net is >> down at the moment: > > it's up again, though it's p

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-03 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Nikolas, On Montag, 2. März 2015, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Almost certain. I could be certain if I could see the log with the > failed test, but it seems that port 80 on reproducible.debian.net is > down at the moment: it's up again, though it's port 443 :) do you still have problems getting th

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-03 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Anyway, I performed a local build and this is what debbindiff outputs: > http://volatile.mapreri.org/2015-03-01/b46eb200e612629e11c7b6a1c925da36/s3ql.dbd.html > e.g. timestamps in sphinx docs. Is this with #776443 applied? Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encryp

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-02 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 02 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:42:32AM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:04:13PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> >> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:42:32AM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:04:13PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> >>

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-02 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:04:13PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> >> https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/s3ql.html claims that S3QL has >> >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:04:13PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/s3ql.html claims that S3QL has > > We performed a rebuild, and your package still

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-01 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hello, > > Hi there! > First, thank you for contacting us. I think the thanks is really due to you for working on this. Least I can do is try to help with my packages :-). >> https://reprod

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hello, Hi there! First, thank you for contacting us. > https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/s3ql.html claims that S3QL has > missing dependencies. If I interpret the build log correctly, the > python3-dugong package is missing. Bu

[Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing

2015-02-28 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Hello, https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/s3ql.html claims that S3QL has missing dependencies. If I interpret the build log correctly, the python3-dugong package is missing. But that's actually available in sid: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-dugong Is not available for reproducible bu