Hi,
so on https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/ you can now see 12 armhf
related jobs, so there is a setup_pbuilder_testing,
setup_schroot_testing_debbindiff and a maintenance job for each of the four
armhf build hosts. IOW: remote job scheduling now works \o/
What's missing now to mak
Hi,
On Montag, 3. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Oops. Accidentally dropped it on one of the debian.net updates. Re-added
> just now, got the ack that it was added, now just need to wait for DNS
> propagation...
thanks!
> (as you may notice, they're all CNAMEs with a consistant pattern
On 2015-08-03, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
>
> $ host wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net
> Host wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Oops. Accidentally dropped it on one of the debian.net updates. Re-added
just now, got
Hi Vagrant,
On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
$ host wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net
Host wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
The others resolve just fine.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi,
https://reproducible.debian.net/index_repositories.html now shows missing
armhf binaries too, so we can see which binNMUs we need to do...
Next thing to do: fix dpkg as described in
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20150727/002569.html
You might also
Hi Vagrant,
On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> But wait, there's more:
> cbxi4pro-armhf-rb.debian.net:
hehe, nice, thanks, I'm configuring that one now too..! :-)
> It is considerably more capable, sure. The individual cores on the
> Banana PI might be a little more powerful,
On 2015-08-01, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> Added new machine...
>>
>> wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
>> Wandboard Quad, quad-core, 2GB ram, ~50GB SATA SSD
But wait, there's more:
cbxi4pro-armhf-rb.debian.net:
Cubox-i4pro, quad-core, 2GB ram, ~50GB SA
Hi Vagrant,
On Samstag, 1. August 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Added new machine...
>
> wbq0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
> Wandboard Quad, quad-core, 2GB ram, ~50GB SATA SSD
[...]
> Holger, I've added access for you with the same key, so tear it up!
cool, thanks, done :)
btw, on my first git clone
On 2015-07-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The current specs:
>
> bpi0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
> Banana PI, dual-core, 1GB ram, ~20GB mSATA.
> ssh port:
> ssh fingerprints:
> 2048 8f:0a:d0:77:a8:59:c0:bb:d0:76:de:14:13:5b:a6:56 (RSA)
> 256 af:b4:13:04:21:30:46:b3:e8:79:ff:7d:99:20:86:f0 (ECDSA)
>
Hi Vagrant,
On Dienstag, 28. Juli 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I am subscribed to the list as of a few weeks ago.
ok cool!
> > yes, we either need to make sure to manually build there in future too,
> > or setup some autobuilders...
> Would it be feasible to use the same machines for that?
On 2015-07-28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> do you need to be cc:ed?
I am subscribed to the list as of a few weeks ago.
> On Montag, 27. Juli 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> So I set about trying to patch u-boot and test reproducibility myself,
>> only to discover that the reproducible toolchain did
Hi Vagrant,
do you need to be cc:ed?
On Montag, 27. Juli 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Thanks for all your work on reproducible builds!
:-) Thanks for helping on the armhf hardware side! :-)
> So I set about trying to patch u-boot and test reproducibility myself,
> only to discover that the
Thanks for all your work on reproducible builds!
I've been lurking for a while, and a while ago noticed one the packages
I maintain (u-boot) was marked as reproducible. I knew that was only
true on amd64, which only builds one of the u-boot packages, and the
other packages at the very least includ
13 matches
Mail list logo
