/2000 10:59:31 AM
Please respond to "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
At 10:05 -0800 12/6/00, Ben Eastwood wrote:
AHHH HA! Thanks Eric
At 10:05 -0800 12/6/00, Ben Eastwood wrote:
AHHH HA! Thanks Eric, that explains alot... the folder I backed up had well
over 300K files and the memory usage was pretty high during some portions
of the process. Thanks for the workaround. Any ETA on the fix?
Hey Ben, if it's not too much trouble,
It's not a stupid question at all, Ben! I just wish I could be more precise
with an answer.
Best regards,
Eric Ullman
Dantz Development
Ben Eastwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I know. Stupid question... You guys work so many miracles already, I
guess I was just hoping for one more!
Wow. There's a lot to respond to, here! I'll start with IncrementalPLUS,
Snapshot, and the scanning and matching process.
Retrospect's normal backup operation is something we call IncrementalPLUS.
Essentially, it's an incremental backup, but with one major difference from
the way that all other
-talk
Subject: RE: How Long does this take for you?
Hmmm, I wasn't aware of the half million file limit... that is a
_major_
concern for me as I am backing up lots of html files and the like. Is
is a
half million files from one source? What are the details of this
problem?
Also, how soon are we
I have questions for y'all:
When running a backup operation of a LOCAL disk (RAID 5 Array, actually)to
a DLT7000 drive, I noticed that the Performance reported varied widely,
from a high of 450MB/min to a low of 13 MB/min, and the "Time Remaining"
would jump around pretty much based on this.
